The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Abstract
Accentuate the positive or accentuate the negative? The literature has been mixed as to how the alternative framing of information in positive or negative terms affects judgments and decisions. We argue that this is because different studies have employed different operational definitions of framing and thus have tapped different underlying processes. We develop a typology to distinguish between three different kinds of valence framing effects. First we discuss the standard risky choice framing effect introduced by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) to illustrate how valence affects willingness to take a risk. Then we discuss attribute framing, which affects the evaluation of object or event characteristics, and goal framing, which affects the persuasiveness of a communication. We describe the distinctions, provide a number of examples of each type, and discuss likely theoretical mechanisms underlying each type of framing effect. Our typology helps explain and resolve apparent confusions in the literature, ties together studies with common underlying mechanisms, and serves as a guide to future research and theory development. We conclude that a broader perspective, focused on the cognitive and motivational consequences of valence-based encoding, opens the door to a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of framing effects. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prospect theory, however, demonstrates that a decision maker's perceived utility can be subjectively influenced by the manner in which the information is framed (as a loss/gain or risk/no risk), what reference is being used to evaluate the options, and the relationship/salience of the alternative to the decision maker [47,70-74].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“The utilization of heuristics in decision making has been shown to be a robust source of influence in the assessment and judgment of decision options, such as the likelihood of contracting a disease, identifying probabilities of accidental fatalities, information identification, and pharmaceutical risk [66,71,73,75].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Heuristics are cognitive processes where full information processing requirements are bypassed and mental shortcutting occurs [66,71,73,94].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194 · cited 9×
“Loewenstein Assigning value to a Loss frame has Replicated Kahneman et al. (1990) & Issacoffee mug greater impact and showed exaggerated effect charoff when mug ownership was (1994) attributed to good performance versus random assignment. Maheswaran & Blood cholesterol Involvement- Greater impact of loss frame for Mey…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 134 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Emby, 1994, Framing and presentation mode effects in professional judgment: Auditors' internal control judgments and substantive testing decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13, 102
- Levin, 1987, Associative effects of information framing, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 85, 10.3758/BF03330291 · DOI
- Wilson, 1987, Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care, Social Behaviour, 2, 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–999 of 999
Nguyen, S., Nicod, L., & Llosa, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114678 · Cited by 17
Using AI and Behavioral Finance to Cope with Limited Attention and Reduce Overdraft Fees
Ben-David, D., Mintz, I., & Sade, O. (2025) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.00304 · Cited by 17
Churchill, S., Good, A., & Pavey, L. (2014) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.008 · Cited by 19
Citizens and Public Performance Measures: Making Sense of Performance Information
James, O., & Olsen, A. L. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316676912.013 · Cited by 17
Framing and Bias: A Literature Review of Recent Findings
Beratšová, A., Krchová, K., Gažová, N., & Jirásek, M. (2018) · Central European Journal of Management · doi:10.5817/cejm2016-2-2 · Cited by 21
Loss Aversion and Preferences in Interaction
Quinn, P., & Cockburn, A. (2018) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2018.1433040 · Cited by 19
From bottom line to consumers’ mind: The framing effects of accounting information
Tian, Y., & Zhou, H. (2015) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.04.003 · Cited by 16
Wong, R. S. (2020) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/deci.12435 · Cited by 17
Masumoto, K., Shiozaki, M., & Taishi, N. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238989 · Cited by 17
Gamification of query-driven knowledge sharing systems
Toorn, C. V., Kirshner, S. N., & Gabb, J. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1849401 · Cited by 21
Niu, Y., Feng, Z., & Niu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-03-2022-0109 · Cited by 17
Harrington, S. S., Anderson, C. L., & Agarwal, R. (2006) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 17
The Effects of Framing Grades on Student Learning and Preferences
Bies-Hernandez, N. J. (2012) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628312450429 · Cited by 18
Karevold, K. I., & Teigen, K. H. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.05.005 · Cited by 17
Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Persuasive Success
Corner, A., & Hahn, U. (2009) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-009-9159-6 · Cited by 19
Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory with graphical displays of probability
Birnbaum, M. H., Johnson, K., & Longbottom, J.-L. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000796 · Cited by 16
Handedness differences in information framing
Jasper, J. D., Fournier, C., & Christman, S. D. (2013) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.11.006 · Cited by 17
Perceptions of risk, benefit and trust associated with consumer food choice
Jonge, J. D., van Kleef, E., Frewer, L. J., & Renn, O. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781845692506.1.125 · Cited by 17
Balbo, L., & Jeannot, F. (2014) · Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) · doi:10.1177/2051570714563686 · Cited by 17
Thinking About TaxPreprint
McCaffery, E. J., & Baron, J. (2004) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.567767 · Cited by 17
Age Attenuates the Negativity Bias in Reframing Effects
Sparks, J., & Ledgerwood, A. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218804526 · Cited by 19
Do versus Don’t: The Impact of Framing on Goal-Level Setting
Tuk, M. A., Prokopec, S., & den Bergh, B. V. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucaa050 · Cited by 18
How to Influence the Results of MCDM?—Evidence of the Impact of Cognitive Biases
Melnik-Leroy, G. A., & Dzemyda, G. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9020121 · Cited by 22
Why and Under What Conditions Does Loss Aversion Emerge?1
Nagaya, K. (2021) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12385 · Cited by 24
Digital nudging for technical debt management at Credit Suisse
Haki, K., Rieder, A., Buchmann, L., & W.Schneider, A. (2022) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2022.2088413 · Cited by 11
Sher, S., McKenzie, C. R. M., Müller‐Trede, J., & Leong, L. M. (2022) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214221120387 · Cited by 16
Making choices in addressing sustainability problems: A link to framing effects and protected values
Lepore, W., & Cunningham, J. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2180656 · Cited by 19
Risky choice in interpersonal context: Do people dare because they care?
Leder, J., & Betsch, T. (2015) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2015.11.003 · Cited by 18
Experimental Economics: A Survey
Chakravarty, S., Friedman, D., Gupta, G., Hatekar, N. R., Mitra, S., & Sunder, S. (2011) · Cited by 15
The Effect of Budget Framing and Budget-Setting Process on Managerial Reporting
Brown, J. L., Fisher, J. G., Peffer, S. A., & Sprinkle, G. B. (2016) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-51535 · Cited by 16
Framing the Human Capital Investment Decision: Examining Gender Bias in Student Loan Borrowing
Bartholomae, S., Kiss, E., Jurgenson, J. B., O’Neill, B., Worthy, S. L., & Kim, J. (2019) · Journal of Family and Economic Issues · doi:10.1007/s10834-018-9603-6 · Cited by 17
Rönnlund, M., Fabio Del Missier, A., Mäntylä, T., & Carelli, M. G. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02038 · Cited by 16
C hief executive officer positive framing and employee ownership
Li, J., Shi, W., & Dasborough, M. T. (2021) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.22064 · Cited by 16
MULTILEVEL FRAMING: AN ALTERNATIVE UNDERSTANDING OF BUDGET CONTROL IN PUBLIC ENTERPRISES
Fallan, L., Pettersen, I. J., & Stemsrudhagen, J. I. (2010) · Financial Accountability and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00498.x · Cited by 17
The fragility of omics risk and benefit perceptions
Börner, F. U., Schütz, H., & Wiedemann, P. (2011) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.01.008 · Cited by 16
Social cues and framing effects in risky decisions among Chinese military students
Zhang, Y., & Miao, D. (2008) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-839x.2008.00263.x · Cited by 16
Voice frequency impacts hemispheric processing of attribute frames
Seta, J. J., McCormick, M., Gallagher, P., McElroy, T., & Seta, C. E. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.009 · Cited by 18
Public Opinion on the Harshness of Local Courts
Applegäte, B. K., & Sanborn, J. B. (2011) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/0734016811418822 · Cited by 16
McCormick, M., & McElroy, T. (2009) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500001777 · Cited by 16
van der Heijden, H. (2013) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-50556 · Cited by 16
Decision rules, escalation of commitment and sensitivity to framing in group decision-making
Curșeu, P. L., Schruijer, S. G. L., & Fodor, O. C. (2016) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-06-2015-0253 · Cited by 20
Choice Under Risk: How Occupation Influences Preferences
Hill, T., Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02003 · Cited by 18
The promise of behavioral economics for understanding decision‐making in the court
Wilson, T. (2019) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12461 · Cited by 18
An experimental analysis of decision channeling by restrictive information display
Tabatabaei, M. (2002) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.427 · Cited by 16
Brandts, J., & Schwieren, C. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68660-6_16 · Cited by 16
Managers’ Green Investment Disclosures and Investors’ ReactionPreprint
Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V. (2011) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1911589 · Cited by 16
How language framing shapes the perception of social norms
Kuang, J., & Bicchieri, C. (2024) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101886 · Cited by 15
Tiffany, P., Pinem, A. A., Hidayanto, A. N., & Kurnia, S. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3029112 · Cited by 15
Combining economics and psychology: Does CO 2 framing strengthen pro-environmental behaviors?
Collet, C., Gastineau, P., Chèze, B., Mahieu, P., & Martinez, F. (2023) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107984 · Cited by 15
Kramer, J., & Petzoldt, T. (2023) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2023.01.006 · Cited by 15
Decision Bias and Bullwhip Effect in Multiechelon Supply Chains: Risk Preference Models
Pournader, M., Narayanan, A., Keblis, M. F., & Ivanov, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2023.3292348 · Cited by 17
Gier, N. R., Krampe, C., & Kenning, P. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1085810 · Cited by 15
Lewis, N., & Atad, E. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2257427 · Cited by 17
A review and analysis of impression management with photographs in sustainability reporting
Kanbaty, M., Hellmann, A., Ang, L., & He, L. (2023) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-09-2022-1798 · Cited by 19
Li, S., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2024.2337076 · Cited by 15
Mitigating the Nocebo Effect in Biosimilar Use and Switching: A Systematic Review
Car, E., Vandenplas, Y., Lacosta, T. B., Simoens, S., Huys, I., Vulto, A. G., & Barbier, L. (2024) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-024-00541-y · Cited by 15
Patient Preferences Regarding 1-Visit versus 2-Visit Root Canal Therapy
Vela, K. C., Walton, R. E., Trope, M., Windschitl, P. D., & Caplan, D. J. (2012) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.06.038 · Cited by 15
More Than Two Choices: The Influence of Context on the Framing Effect
Cheng, Y., Chuang, S., Huang, M. C.-J., & Hsieh, W.-C. (2012) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-012-9150-5 · Cited by 16
Education for Rational Thought
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139048224.006 · Cited by 15
Levin, I. P., McElroy, T., Gaeth, G. J., Hedgcock, W. M., & Denburg, N. L. (2014) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/14322-003 · Cited by 15
Self-citationTone in REIT financial statements and institutional investments
Carstens, R., & Freybote, J. (2019) · Journal of Property Research · doi:10.1080/09599916.2019.1650802 · Cited by 16
Huang, G., Li, K., & Li, H. (2019) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547019888659 · Cited by 20
Woike, J. K., & Hafenbrädl, S. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2162 · Cited by 15
Reasoning about privacy in mobile application install decisions: Risk perception and framing
Tay, S. W., Teh, P. S., & Payne, S. J. (2020) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102517 · Cited by 15
National Leaders’ Usage of Twitter in Response to COVID-19: A Sentiment Analysis
Wang, Y., Croucher, S. M., & Pearson, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.732399 · Cited by 16
Fu, H., Xue, P., Wu, Z., Zhu, H. M., Niu, J., Lai, Y., & Hou, C. (2022) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings12060741 · Cited by 15
The decoy effect in relative performance evaluation and the debiasing role of DEA
Ahn, H., & Novoa, N. V. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.045 · Cited by 15
Robison, L. J., Shupp, R., & Myers, R. J. (2010) · The Journal of Socio-Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.005 · Cited by 16
The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence‐consistent Shift?
Pepermans, G., & Rousseau, S. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23491 · Cited by 15
Message framing of products causes a preference shift in consumers' choices
Gamliel, E. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.319 · Cited by 17
To end life or not to prolong life: The effect of message framing on attitudes toward euthanasia
Gamliel, E. (2012) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105312455078 · Cited by 15
Is the framing effect a framing affect?
Gosling, C. J., & Moutier, S. (2018) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021818796016 · Cited by 15
Fit or not? Bringing regulatory fit into the frame on health food preferences
Kuo, K.-S., Chuang, S., Huang, M. C.-J., & Wu, P.-Y. (2019) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-10-2018-0434 · Cited by 15
Nolan, K., Dalal, D. K., & Carter, N. (2020) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2020.02.006 · Cited by 15
Haddad, H., & Delhomme, P. (2006) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2006.02.002 · Cited by 16
Learning motivation and transfer of human capital development
Combs, G. M., Luthans, F., & Griffith, J. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203971611-15 · Cited by 20
Hong, T. J. (2012) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212439710 · Cited by 16
Optimisme et pessimisme comparatifs consécutifs à l'exposition à plusieurs messages menaçants
Chappé, J., Verlhiac, J., & Meyer, T. (2007) · European Review of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.erap.2006.07.001 · Cited by 17
Holmes-Rovner, M. M., & Wills, C. E. (2002) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200209001-00005 · Cited by 15
Connolly, T., Ordóñez, L. D., & Barker, S. B. (2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop212019 · Cited by 17
Shan, L., Jiao, X., Wu, L., Shao, Y., & Xu, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.911462 · Cited by 17
The fundamental importance of method to theory
Dale, R. A. C., Warlaumont, A. S., & Johnson, K. L. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00120-5 · Cited by 14
Fu, L., & Gao, J. W. (2023) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2023.2179088 · Cited by 14
Rejections Are More Contagious than Choices: How Another’s Decisions Shape Our Own
Nan, L. X., Park, S. K., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad007 · Cited by 16
Repeatable Effects of Synchronizing Perceptual Tasks with Heartbeat on Situation Awareness
Vanderhaegen, F., Wolff, M., & Mollard, R. (2022) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.05.005 · Cited by 14
Push notifications and news snacking: The impact of mobile news alert framing on reader engagement
Barnes, R., Mulcahy, R. F., & Riedel, A. S. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231196580 · Cited by 16
Kim, J. H., Kim, J., Chung, N., & Koo, C. (2024) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2024.2323944 · Cited by 14
Yang, W. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0306639 · Cited by 18
Капранов, О. (2017) · Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies · doi:10.15845/bells.v7i0.1088 · Cited by 14
Combined framing effects on attitudes and behavioral intentions toward mortgage advertisements
Dobson, D. S., & Poels, K. (2020) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-07-2019-0277 · Cited by 14
Risk preferences in self–other decisions: The effect of payoff allocation framing
Li, H., Yang, Y., Liu, D., & Xie, X. (2020) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2207 · Cited by 16
Nab, M., Jansma, S. R., & Gosselt, J. F. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101760 · Cited by 14
Be alarmed. Some reflections about the COVID-19 risk communication in Germany
Wiedemann, P. M., & Dorl, W. (2020) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2020.1825984 · Cited by 15
Text highlighting for consumer insights: Influence of text length and difficulty
Jaeger, S. R., Chheang, S. L., & Ares, G. (2021) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104492 · Cited by 14
Hing, N. Y. L., Woon, Y. L., Lee, Y. K., Kim, H. J., Lothfi, N. M., Wong, E. R., Perialathan, K., Sanusi, N. H. A., Isa, A., Leong, C. T., et al. (2022) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009250 · Cited by 16
The illusion of the framing effect in risky decision making
Okder, H. (2010) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.715 · Cited by 16
Ferguson, E., Spence, A., Townsend, E., Prowse, C., Palmer, J., Fleming, P., & van Hilten, J. A. (2009) · Transfusion · doi:10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02179.x · Cited by 14
Negative verbal probabilities undermine communication of climate science
Juanchich, M., Teigen, K. H., Shepherd, T. G., & Sirota, M. (2025) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02472-1 · Cited by 2
“The effect of directionality is akin to its better-known cousin, the attribute framing effect, where logically equivalent information leads to different decisions (for example, a 20% chance of success versus an 80% chance of failure) 21 .”
Ordóñez (2000) · doi:10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levin, Irwin P.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-188
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080612551
- Cited by
- 2,592
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 102
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- framing effects, valence framing, positive and negative framing, decision making under risk, attribute framing, goal framing, persuasion, risk-taking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
