The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Abstract
Accentuate the positive or accentuate the negative? The literature has been mixed as to how the alternative framing of information in positive or negative terms affects judgments and decisions. We argue that this is because different studies have employed different operational definitions of framing and thus have tapped different underlying processes. We develop a typology to distinguish between three different kinds of valence framing effects. First we discuss the standard risky choice framing effect introduced by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) to illustrate how valence affects willingness to take a risk. Then we discuss attribute framing, which affects the evaluation of object or event characteristics, and goal framing, which affects the persuasiveness of a communication. We describe the distinctions, provide a number of examples of each type, and discuss likely theoretical mechanisms underlying each type of framing effect. Our typology helps explain and resolve apparent confusions in the literature, ties together studies with common underlying mechanisms, and serves as a guide to future research and theory development. We conclude that a broader perspective, focused on the cognitive and motivational consequences of valence-based encoding, opens the door to a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of framing effects. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prospect theory, however, demonstrates that a decision maker's perceived utility can be subjectively influenced by the manner in which the information is framed (as a loss/gain or risk/no risk), what reference is being used to evaluate the options, and the relationship/salience of the alternative to the decision maker [47,70-74].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“The utilization of heuristics in decision making has been shown to be a robust source of influence in the assessment and judgment of decision options, such as the likelihood of contracting a disease, identifying probabilities of accidental fatalities, information identification, and pharmaceutical risk [66,71,73,75].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Heuristics are cognitive processes where full information processing requirements are bypassed and mental shortcutting occurs [66,71,73,94].”
From Rationality versus reality: the challenges of evidence-based decision making for health policy makers (2010) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. (1985) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 · Cited by 4,885
Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior
JONES, E. E. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,760
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194 · cited 9×
“Loewenstein Assigning value to a Loss frame has Replicated Kahneman et al. (1990) & Issacoffee mug greater impact and showed exaggerated effect charoff when mug ownership was (1994) attributed to good performance versus random assignment. Maheswaran & Blood cholesterol Involvement- Greater impact of loss frame for Mey…”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 134 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Emby, 1994, Framing and presentation mode effects in professional judgment: Auditors' internal control judgments and substantive testing decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13, 102
- Levin, 1987, Associative effects of information framing, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 85, 10.3758/BF03330291 · DOI
- Wilson, 1987, Framing of decisions and selections of alternatives in health care, Social Behaviour, 2, 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
ORGANISATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY: A CASE FOR FORMULATING A TAILOR-MADE DEFINITION
Kiewiet, D. J., & Vos, J. F. J. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management · doi:10.1142/s1464333207002640 · Cited by 51
Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., & Jarmolowicz, D. (2016) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1002/jaba.277 · Cited by 45
de Vries, G., Terwel, B. W., & Ellemers, N. (2015) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2015.1047884 · Cited by 52
Wang, X. T. (2003) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.454 · Cited by 52
Cao, Q., Yang, F., & Liu, M. (2021) · Pacific-Basin Finance Journal · doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101646 · Cited by 50
Cozzio, C., Tokarchuk, O., & Maurer, O. (2021) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-02-2021-0114 · Cited by 58
Phillips, L. T., Jun, S., & Shakeri, A. (2022) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2020.0314 · Cited by 60
Dorison, C. A., Lerner, J. S., Heller, B., Rothman, A. J., Kawachi, I. I., Wang, K., Rees, V. W., Gill, B., Gibbs, N., Ebersole, C. R., et al. (2022) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-022-00128-3 · Cited by 73
Bonobos and chimpanzees exhibit human-like framing effects
Krupenye, C., Rosati, A. G., & Hare, B. A. (2015) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0527 · Cited by 52
A Psychophysiological Approach For Measuring Response to Messaging
Martínez‐Fiestas, M., del Jesús, M. I. V., Sánchez‐Fernández, J., & Montoro-Ríos, F. J. (2015) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-55-2-192-205 · Cited by 58
Rethinking Risk: Prospect Theory Application in Health Message Framing Research
Harrington, N. G., & Kerr, A. M. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1110004 · Cited by 58
Coënt, P. L., Préget, R., & Thoyer, S. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.008 · Cited by 56
Shanahan, E. A., Raile, E. D., French, K. A., & McEvoy, J. (2018) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12269 · Cited by 50
Communicating supply chain sustainability: transparency and framing effects
Duan, Y., Aloysius, J. A., & Mollenkopf, D. A. (2021) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-04-2020-0107 · Cited by 49
Levels of information: A framing hierarchy
Sher, S., & McKenzie, C. R. M. (2011) · Cited by 50
Onwezen, M. C. (2022) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104758 · Cited by 51
Zhou, X., Lou, C., & Huang, X. (2023) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2023.2217866 · Cited by 49
Resilience vs. Adaptation: Framing and action
Wong‐Parodi, G., Fischhoff, B., & Strauss, B. (2015) · Climate Risk Management · doi:10.1016/j.crm.2015.07.002 · Cited by 59
Chang, C. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070067 · Cited by 51
The Offer Framing Effect: Choosing Single versus Bundled Offerings Affects Variety Seeking
Mittelman, M., Andrade, E. B., Chattopadhyay, A., & Brendl, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/678193 · Cited by 49
Uncovering the Circumstances of Performance Information Use Findings from an Experiment
Moynihan, D. P. (2015) · Public Performance & Management Review · doi:10.1080/15309576.2016.1071160 · Cited by 49
Weber, L., & Bauman, C. W. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1230 · Cited by 51
Barbosa, S. D., Fayolle, A. J.-C., & Smith, B. R. (2019) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.12.006 · Cited by 53
The Neural Mechanism of the Social Framing Effect: Evidence from fMRI and tDCS Studies
Liu, J., Gu, R., Liao, C., Lu, J., Fang, Y., Xu, P., Luo, Y., & Cui, F. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1385-19.2020 · Cited by 50
Accounting Standards, Implementation Guidance, and Example‐Based Reasoning
Clor-Proell, S. M., & Nelson, M. W. (2007) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2007.00248.x · Cited by 49
Reflections of the self: how self‐esteem determines decision framing and increases risk taking
McElroy, T., Seta, J. J., & Waring, D. A. (2006) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.551 · Cited by 51
The Use of Framing in Inventory Decisions
Schultz, K. L., Robinson, L. W., Thomas, L. J., Schultz, J., & McClain, J. O. (2017) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.12782 · Cited by 49
Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation - ENLG '09
Belz, A., Albert Gatt, A., Portet, F., & Purver, M. (2009) · doi:10.3115/1610195 · Cited by 49
Lagomarsino, M., Lemarié, L., & Puntiroli, M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.046 · Cited by 49
Kim, T., & Song, H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2049134 · Cited by 56
Tax framing, Instrumentality and individual differences: Are there two different cultures?
Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Lewis, A. (2005) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2005.07.003 · Cited by 49
Individual and Group Biases in Value and Uncertainty Judgments
Montibeller, G., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2017) · International series in management science/operations research/International series in operations research & management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65052-4_15 · Cited by 54
Leader-member exchange and employee resilience: the mediating role of regulatory focus
Kakkar, S. (2019) · Management Research Review · doi:10.1108/mrr-03-2018-0116 · Cited by 52
The Emotional Effects of Science Narratives: A Theoretical Framework
Bilandzić, H., Kinnebrock, S., & Klingler, M. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i1.2602 · Cited by 63
Zubair, M., Iqbal, S., Usman, S. M., Awais, M., Wang, R., & Wang, X. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75343-8 · Cited by 57
Choice Architecture, Framing, and Cascaded Privacy Choices
Adjerid, I., Acquisti, A., & Loewenstein, G. F. (2018) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3028 · Cited by 73
On the prevalence of framing effects across subject-pools in a two-person cooperation game
Goerg, S. J., & Walkowitz, G. (2010) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.06.001 · Cited by 48
Perspective in Statements of Quantity, with Implications for Consumer Psychology
Sanford, A. J., Fay, N., Stewart, A. J., & Moxey, L. M. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00424 · Cited by 50
Qu, H., & Daniel, J. L. (2020) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764020959475 · Cited by 53
Vergari, F., Tibuzzi, A., & Basile, G. (2010) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7347-4_23 · Cited by 47
Leveraging the Financial Crisis to Fulfill the Promise of Progressive Management
Henisz, W. J. (2011) · Academy of Management Learning and Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2011.62798936 · Cited by 46
Mosemghvdlishvili, L., & Jansz, J. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812457326 · Cited by 47
Advancing Framing Theory: Designing an Equivalency Frame to Improve Political Information Processing
Shulman, H. C., & Sweitzer, M. D. (2018) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1093/hcr/hqx006 · Cited by 47
Confidence in the safety of blood for transfusion: the effect of message framing
Farrell, K., Ferguson, E., James, V., & Lowe, K. C. (2001) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41111335.x · Cited by 48
Multimodal information presentation for high load human computer interaction
Cao, Y. (2010) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036531160 · Cited by 46
Walker, A. C., Turpin, M. H., Meyers, E. A., Stolz, J. A., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104633 · Cited by 52
Social media influencers’ visual framing of Iran on YouTube
Motahar, P. S., Tavakoli, R., & Mura, P. (2021) · Tourism Recreation Research · doi:10.1080/02508281.2021.2014252 · Cited by 59
Wang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12932 · Cited by 46
The role of recommendation sources and attribute framing in online product recommendations
Yang, Y., Zheng, J.-H., Yu, Y.-N., Qiu, Y., & Wang, L. (2024) · Journal of business research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114498 · Cited by 36
Impact of Framing on Intentions to Vaccinate Daughters against HPV: A Cross-Cultural Perspective
Lechuga, J., Swain, G. R., & Weinhardt, L. S. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9273-1 · Cited by 46
Liu, X. K., Wright, A. M., & Wu, Y. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2156-1 · Cited by 46
Measuring Individual Differences in Decision Biases: Methodological Considerations
Aczél, B., Bagó, B., Szollosi, A., Foldes, A., & Lukács, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01770 · Cited by 53
What Sells Better in Green Communications:Fear or Hope?
Lee, Y., Chang, C., & Chen, P. (2017) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2017-048 · Cited by 50
Johns, G., & Hajj, R. A. (2015) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2055 · Cited by 45
Framing effects on preparation intentions: distinguishing actions and outcomes
McClure, J., White, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009) · Disaster Prevention and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/09653560910953252 · Cited by 46
Is it the picture or is it the frame? An fMRI study on the neurobiology of framing effects
Silveira, S., Fehse, K., Vedder, A., Elvers, K., & Hennig‐Fast, K. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00528 · Cited by 46
Hardisty, D. J., Beall, A. T., Lubowski, R. N., Petsonk, A., & Romero‐Canyas, R. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101342 · Cited by 45
Gette, C. R., Kryjevskaia, M., Stetzer, M. R., & Heron, P. R. L. (2018) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.010113 · Cited by 45
Trains and Twitter: Firm generated content, consumer relationship management and message framing
Nisar, T. M., & Prabhakar, G. P. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.026 · Cited by 49
Foreign language effect in decision-making: How foreign is it?
Miozzo, M., Navarrete, E., Ongis, M., Mello, E., Girotto, V., & Peressotti, F. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104245 · Cited by 49
Hopefully that’s not wasted! The role of hope for reducing food waste
Khalil, M., Northey, G., Septianto, F., & Lang, B. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.080 · Cited by 48
Positive versus Negative Framing Affects Justice Judgments
Gamliel, E., & Péer, E. (2006) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0009-5 · Cited by 46
D'angelo, P. (2019) · The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies · doi:10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021 · Cited by 48
Reconciling the opposing effects of neurobiological evidence on criminal sentencing judgments
Allen, C. H., Vold, K., Felsen, G., Blumenthal‐Barby, J. S., & Aharoni, E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210584 · Cited by 44
Gómez-Carmona, D., Muñoz‐Leiva, F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Nieto-Ruíz, A., Martínez‐Fiestas, M., & Campoy, C. (2021) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1914701 · Cited by 43
Cervellon, M.-C. (2012) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2012.10672462 · Cited by 45
Stoutenborough, J. W., Robinson, S. E., & Vedlitz, A. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.04.005 · Cited by 44
Stakeholder Judgments of Value
Lankoski, L., Smith, N. C., & Wassenhove, L. N. V. (2016) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2016.28 · Cited by 44
Grappe, C. G., Lombart, C., Louis, D., & Durif, F. (2022) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102893 · Cited by 44
Interference processes in fuzzy-trace theory: Aging, Alzheimer's disease, and development.
Reyna, V., & Mills, B. (2007) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11587-010 · Cited by 47
Pal, D., Vanijja, V., Zhang, X., & Thapliyal, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/tce.2021.3115847 · Cited by 43
A review of tourism and hospitality studies on behavioural economics
Li, S., Liu, Y., Dai, S., & Chen, M. (2022) · Tourism Economics · doi:10.1177/13548166211060889 · Cited by 43
Cao, X. (2015) · International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing · doi:10.1002/nvsm.1536 · Cited by 51
Grinstein, A., & Kronrod, A. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.14.0224 · Cited by 47
Technological viewpoints (frames) about electronic prescribing in physician practices
Agarwal, R., Angst, C. M., DesRoches, C. M., & Fischer, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.2009.001826 · Cited by 42
Framing Democracy and Conflict Through Storytelling in Deliberative Groups
Black, L. W. (2013) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.153 · Cited by 42
Traveling to a Gendered Destination: A Goal-Framed Advertising Perspective
Pan, L., Lu, L., & Gürsoy, D. (2020) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/1096348019899150 · Cited by 42
Tombu, M. N., & Mandel, D. R. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1863 · Cited by 45
A naturalistic study of the impact of message framing on highway speeding
Chaurand, N., Bossart, F., & Delhomme, P. (2015) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.09.001 · Cited by 47
Jung, W., & Villegas, J. (2011) · Health Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07359683.2011.595641 · Cited by 50
Choosing your words carefully: Leaders' narratives of complex emergent problem resolution
Havermans, L. A., Keegan, A., & den Hartog, D. D. (2015) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.001 · Cited by 41
Using Framing Effects to Inform More Sustainable Infrastructure Design Decisions
Shealy, T., Klotz, L. E., Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., & Bell, R. G. (2016) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001152 · Cited by 49
Informing public attitudes to non-potable water reuse – The impact of message framing
Goodwin, D., Raffin, M., Jeffrey, P. J., & Smith, H. M. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.006 · Cited by 42
Tanford, S., Choi, C., & Joe, S. (2018) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287518793037 · Cited by 42
DeGolia, A. H., Hiroyasu, E. H. T., & Anderson, S. E. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220320 · Cited by 46
Caputo, V. (2020) · Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics · doi:10.1111/1467-8489.12393 · Cited by 42
Persuasive performance feedback: the effect of framing on self-efficacy.
Choe, E. K., Lee, B., Munson, S. A., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. (2013) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 42
Speaker–listener incompatibility: Joint and separate processing in risky choice framing
van Buiten, M., & Keren, G. B. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.002 · Cited by 43
Adaptive memory: Thinking about function.
Bell, R., Röer, J. P., & Buchner, A. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000066 · Cited by 43
Awareness and perceived value of economic information in controlling somatic cell count
van Asseldonk, M. A. P. M., Renes, R. J., Lam, T. J. G. M., & Hogeveen, H. (2010) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.b4713 · Cited by 41
A Simple Intervention to Reduce Framing Effects in Perceptions of Global Climate Change
Baumer, E. P. S., Polletta, F., Pierski, N., & Gay, G. K. (2015) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2015.1084015 · Cited by 45
Zhang, B., Ritchie, B. W., Mair, J., & Driml, S. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1629448 · Cited by 43
Attentional and emotional brain response to message framing in context of green marketing
Zubair, M., Wang, X., Iqbal, S., Awais, M., & Wang, R. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04912 · Cited by 49
Wen, T., Leung, X. Y., Li, B., & Hu, L. (2021) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2021.103265 · Cited by 45
Hong, Y., & Hashimoto, M. (2021) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1978668 · Cited by 41
Do People Care About Social Context? Framing Effects in Dictator GamesPreprint
Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., & Rand, D. G. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1927343 · Cited by 41
The Ending Effect in Investment Decisions: The Motivational Need for an Emotionally Rewarding Ending
Xing, C., Meng, Y., Isaacowitz, D. M., Wen, Y., & Lin, Z. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218788829 · Cited by 40
White, R. W. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23128 · Cited by 45
“Biases” in Adaptive Natural Resource Management
Iftekhar, M. S., & Pannell, D. J. (2015) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12189 · Cited by 40
Behavioural economics, consumption and environmental protection
Sunstein, C. R. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781783471270.00032 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levin, Irwin P.
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-188
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080612551
- Cited by
- 2,592
- References
- 134
- Citations by year
- 2026: 105 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 165 · 2020: 180 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 111 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 151 · 2014: 103 · 2013: 116 · 2012: 102
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- framing effects, valence framing, positive and negative framing, decision making under risk, attribute framing, goal framing, persuasion, risk-taking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
