Cited by 9Motor Control and AdaptationNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Sequential Motor Behavior and the Basal Ganglia: Evidence from a serial reaction time task in monkeys

Turner, Robert S., McCairn, Kevin, Simmons, Donn, Bar-Gad, Izhar·2005·The Basal Ganglia VIII

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-28066-9_54

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temporary inactivations of sensorimotor regions of the internal segment of the globus pallidus had no effect on the ability of monkeys to produce a highly practiced motor sequence.

    “In contrast to this prediction, however, Turner et al. [30] reported that the great majority of such inactivations had no effect on the ability of monkeys to produce a highly practiced motor sequence.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, R. S., McCairn, K., Simmons, D., & Bar-Gad, I.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
The Basal Ganglia VIII
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2005
Pages
563-574
OpenAlex
W196348937
Cited by
9
References
66
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
basal ganglia, motor control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review