Cited by 16Embodied and Extended CognitionSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric DysfunctionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Active Inference, Novelty and Neglect

Parr, Thomas, Friston, Karl J.·2018·Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an overview of the principles of active inference. We illustrate how different forms of short-term memory are expressed formally (mathematically) through appealing to beliefs about the causes of our sensations and about the actions we pursue. This is used to motivate an approach to active vision that depends upon inferences about the causes of 'what I have seen' and learning about 'what I would see if I were to look there'. The former could manifest as persistent 'delay-period' activity - of the sort associated with working memory, while the latter is better suited to changes in synaptic efficacy - of the sort that underlies short-term learning and adaptation. We review formulations of these ideas in terms of active inference, their role in directing visual exploration and the consequences - for active vision - of their failures. To illustrate the latter, we draw upon some of our recent work on the computational anatomy of visual neglect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/7854_2018_61

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-C does not entail the prediction that suppression of background activity will disrupt conscious experience, although suppression of background activity could alter precision estimation in ways that impact visuospatial awareness and behaviour.

    “AI-C does not entail this prediction, although it is plausible that the suppression of background activity could alter precision estimation in ways that impact visuospatial awareness and behaviour”

    From Integrated information and predictive processing theories of consciousness: An adversarial collaborative review (2026) · cites this paper as Parr & Friston, 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brown, T. H., Y. Zhao and V. Leung (2009). Hebbian Plasticity A2 - Squire, Larry R. Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford, Academic Press : 1049-1056.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parr, T., & Friston, K. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Parr, Thomas
Venue
Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
Published
2018
Volume
41
Pages
115-128
ISSN
  • 1866-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3389
OpenAlex
W2886516001
Cited by
15
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current topics in behavioral neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (088130/Z/09/Z)
  • Rosetrees Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
active inference, novelty, neglect, active vision, short-term memory, working memory, delay-period activity, synaptic plasticity, visual exploration, computational anatomy, visual neglect, Bayesian inference
MeSH terms
Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Perceptual Disorders, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review