Rasch Models

·1995·Springer eBooks

DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Assessment of Mindfulness: Review on State of the Art
Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5 · Cited by 464
Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs
Dixon, P. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.004 · Cited by 359
Is the Pain Visual Analogue Scale Linear and Responsive to Change? An Exploration Using Rasch Analysis
Kersten, P., White, P. J., & Tennant, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099485 · Cited by 225
Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II
Fledderus, M., Oude Voshaar, M. A. H., ten Klooster, P. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0028200 · Cited by 195
Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points
Londregan, J. (1999) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029804 · Cited by 159
Accuracy of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) for Measuring Children’s Competence to Consent to Clinical Research
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Lindeboom, R., Benninga, M. A., Zwaan, C. M., van Goudoever, J. B., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2014) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1694 · Cited by 148
Empirical validation of the English version of the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory
Lebel, S., Simard, S., Harris, C., Feldstain, A., Beattie, S., McCallum, M., Lefebvre, M., Savard, J., & Devins, G. M. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1088-2 · Cited by 90
Experiential household food insecurity in an urban underserved slum of North India
Agarwal, S., Sethi, V., Gupta, P., Jha, M., Agnihotri, A., & Nord, M. (2009) · Food Security · doi:10.1007/s12571-009-0034-y · Cited by 73
Screening of phonological awareness in the early elementary grades: an IRT approach
Vloedgraven, J. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2007) · Annals of Dyslexia · doi:10.1007/s11881-007-0001-2 · Cited by 72
Three sides of the same coin: Measuring global cognitive impairment with the MMSE, ADAS‐cog and CAMCOG
Wouters, H., van Gool, W. A., Schmand, B., Zwinderman, A. H., & Lindeboom, R. (2010) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2402 · Cited by 43
Evaluating composite health measures using Rasch modelling: An illustrative example
Hagquist, C. (2001) · Sozial- und Präventivmedizin SPM · doi:10.1007/bf01321663 · Cited by 34
Die anwendbarkeit des BDI-II in klinischen und nichtklinischen populationen aus psychometrischer sicht. eine vergleichende analyse mit dem rasch-modell.
Alexandrowicz, R. W., Fritzsche, S., & Keller, F. (2014) · Neuropsychiatrie · doi:10.1007/s40211-014-0104-z · Cited by 20
Norwegian Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (NAAQ): A psychometric evaluation.
Østergaard, T., Lundgren, T., Zettle, R. D., Landrø, N. I., & Haaland, V. Ø. (2020) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2019.12.002 · Cited by 10

Venue: Springer eBooks
Publisher: Springer New York
Published: 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7
OpenAlex: W4237035249
Cited by: 359
References: 0
FWCI: 3.97
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review