Cited by 63Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

A Preliminary Exploration of the Barriers to Delivering (and Receiving) Exposure-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety Disorders in Adult Community Mental Health Settings

Open access
Wolitzky-Taylor, Kate, Fenwick, Karissa, Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca, Grossman, Jason, Bearman, Sarah Kate, Arch, Joanna, Miranda, Jeanne, Chung, Bowen·2018·Community Mental Health Journal

Abstract

Despite the effectiveness of exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders, few individuals in need receive this treatment, particularly in community mental health settings serving low-income adults. The present study took a preliminary step to understand these barriers by conducting a series of key informant interviews and focus groups among patients, providers, clinical administrators, and policy makers. Several themes emerged as barriers to the delivery of exposure-based CBT in these settings, including therapist training and compentency issues, logistical issues, and funding stream issues. Clinical implications and future research that can build from these data are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10597-018-0252-x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior qualitative research with specialty care BHPs in pediatric and adult populations found lack of advanced training and supervision, treatment structure, and time constraints as provider barriers to using CBT for anxiety including exposure.

    “Research conducted with specialty care BHPs in both pediatric (Ringle et al., 2015) and adult (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2018) populations found lack of advanced training and supervision, treatment structure, and time constraints as provider barriers to using CBT for anxiety including exposure”

    From Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Evidence-Based, Cognitive–Behavioral Anxiety Interventions in Integrated Primary Care Practice (2023) · cites this paper as Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar to prior work in specialty care, BHPs in IPC settings identified barriers and facilitators to using cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions at multiple levels spanning the IPC model, provider, and patient.

    “Similar to prior work in specialty care (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2018; Youn et al., 2020), BHPs in IPC settings identified barriers and facilitators to using cognitive-behavioral anxiety interventions at multiple levels spanning the IPC model, provider, and patient.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lilienfeld SO Lynn SJ Lohr JM 2003 Pseudoscience is alive and well The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice 2 107 110

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolitzky-Taylor, K., Fenwick, K., Lengnick-Hall, R., Grossman, J., Bearman, S. K., Arch, J., Miranda, J., & Chung, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Wolitzky-Taylor, Kate
Venue
Community Mental Health Journal
Published
2018-03-09
Volume
54
Issue
7
Pages
899-911
ISSN
  • 0010-3853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2789
OpenAlex
W2792149797
Cited by
62
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Community Mental Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Advancement of Translational Sciences (UL1TR000124)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, community mental health services, low-income adults, therapist training, treatment funding, treatment access, key informant interviews
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review