CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,653Community Health and DevelopmentCommunity and Sustainable DevelopmentSocial Sciences and Policies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empowerment Theory

Zimmerman, Marc A.·2000·Handbook of Community Psychology
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Alinsky, S. (1971). Rules for radicals NY: Vintage
  2. Brown, L. D. (1983). Organizing participatory research: Interfaces for joint inquiry and organizational change. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 4, 9–19
  3. Cornell Empowerment Group. (1989). Empowerment and family support. Networking Bulletin, 1,1–23
  4. De Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation New York: Academic
  5. Dougherty, D. (1988). Participation in community organizations: Effects on political efficacy, personal efficacy, and self-esteem Doctoral Dissertation, Boston University, Boston, MA
  6. Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). Exchange networks and community politics Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  7. Gallant, R. V., Cohen, C., & Wolff, T. (1985). Change of older persons’ image, impact on public policy result from Highland Valley Empowerment Plan. Perspective on Aging, 14, 9–13
  8. Heil, W. B. (1991, August). Re-reviewing participation in decision-making: Toward a multidimensional model Paper presented at the Ninety-Ninth Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA
  9. Langer, E. J. (1983). The Psychology of Control. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  10. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is that rigorous?: Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation: New directions for program evaluation (pp. 73–84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
  11. Pivan, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977). Poor people’s movements: Why they succeed, how they fail New York: Vintage Books
  12. Rappaport, J. (1985). The power of empowerment language. Social Policy, 16, 15–21
  13. White, D. M. (1981). “Mediacracy”: Mass media and psychopathology. In J.M. Joffe & G. W. Albee (Eds.), Prevention through political action and social change. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England
  14. Zimmerman, M. A. (1986). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,005

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zimmerman, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Zimmerman, Marc A.
ORCID
Zimmerman, Marc A.
Venue
Handbook of Community Psychology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2000
Pages
43-63
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
OpenAlex
W2786267815
Cited by
1,653
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 158 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 74 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 50
FWCI
76.11
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Development › Community and Sustainable Development
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
Keywords
empowerment theory, empowerment, community empowerment, social change, community development, decision-making, organizational functioning, community life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review