The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Terrorism and Probability Neglect
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Decision, Probability and Utility · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,474
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8 · Cited by 22,650
Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267 · Cited by 5,955
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2004) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,536
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
Slovic, P. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315661773 · Cited by 2,217
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1978) · Uncertainty in Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-214850-7.50008-5 · Cited by 2,062
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282562 · Cited by 1,843
A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived Benefit
Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x · Cited by 1,151
Cited by
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x · Cited by 1,443
Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
Kahan, D. M. (2013) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005271 · Cited by 1,302
The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs.
Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.2.409 · Cited by 745
Emotion and Rationality: A Critical Review and Interpretation of Empirical Evidence
Pham, M. T. (2007) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.2.155 · Cited by 552
Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study
Kahan, D. M. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2182588 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Sunstein, C. R.
- Venue
- The Risks of Terrorism
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 2003
- Pages
- 23-38
- OpenAlex
- W2149462470
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 22.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Terrorism and Probability Neglect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/978-1-4757-6787-2_2
- The paper
- Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Terrorism and Probability Neglect. The Risks of Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6787-2_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
