Cited by 289Social Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read

Anspach, Nicolas M.·2017·Political Communication

Abstract

Has the introduction of social media into the information landscape changed the heuristics individuals use when selecting news? Social media allow users to easily share and endorse political content. These features facilitate personal influence, possibly increasing the salience of partisan information, making users more likely to read endorsed content. To test this possibility, I utilize snowball sampling to conduct a survey experiment featuring mock Facebook News Feeds. These feeds contain different levels of social media activity attributed to different sources, varying from fictional individuals to subjects’ own friends and family members. I find that online endorsements and discussions serve as heuristics when deciding which content to consume, outweighing partisan selectivity. This effect is only significant when the activity comes from friends or family members, as social influence attributed to fictional individuals has no effect on information selectivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Online and social media users consume a particularly diverse news diet.

    “online and social media users consume a particularly diverse news diet (Fletcher & Nielsen, 2018;Anspach, 2017)”

    From Filter bubble (2019) · cites this paper as Anspach, 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anspach, N. M.
Affiliations
York College of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Anspach, Nicolas M.
Venue
Political Communication
Published
2017-05-23
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
590-606
ISSN
  • 1058-4609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7675
OpenAlex
W2618838623
Cited by
289
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 2
FWCI
62.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
personal influence, social media, news selection, Facebook, political information, social influence, news consumption, snowball sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review