Cited by 44Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

The Role of Big Data Analytics in Predicting Suicide

Kessler, Ronald C., Bernecker, Samantha L., Bossarte, Robert M., Luedtke, Alex R., McCarthy, John F., Nock, Matthew K., Pigeon, Wilfred R., Petukhova, Maria V. +4 more·2019·Personalized Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-03553-2_5

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kessler, R. C., Bernecker, S. L., Bossarte, R. M., Luedtke, A. R., McCarthy, J. F., Nock, M. K., Pigeon, W. R., Petukhova, M. V., Sadikova, E., VanderWeele, T. J., Zuromski, K. L., & Zaslavsky, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • VA Center for Clinical Management Research (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
Personalized Psychiatry
Published
2019
Pages
77-98
OpenAlex
W2912751061
Cited by
44
References
101
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
49.69
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
suicide risk prediction, big data analytics, electronic health records, machine learning, clinical evaluation, treatment planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review