Cited by 251Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Predictive Modeling and Concentration of the Risk of Suicide: Implications for Preventive Interventions in the US Department of Veterans Affairs

Open access
McCarthy, John F., Bossarte, Robert M., Katz, Ira R., Thompson, Caitlin, Kemp, Janet, Hannemann, Claire M., Nielson, Christopher, Schoenbaum, Michael·2015·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) evaluated the use of predictive modeling to identify patients at risk for suicide and to supplement ongoing care with risk-stratified interventions. Methods. Suicide data came from the National Death Index. Predictors were measures from VHA clinical records incorporating patient-months from October 1, 2008, to September 30, 2011, for all suicide decedents and 1% of living patients, divided randomly into development and validation samples. We used data on all patients alive on September 30, 2010, to evaluate predictions of suicide risk over 1 year. Results. Modeling demonstrated that suicide rates were 82 and 60 times greater than the rate in the overall sample in the highest 0.01% stratum for calculated risk for the development and validation samples, respectively; 39 and 30 times greater in the highest 0.10%; 14 and 12 times greater in the highest 1.00%; and 6.3 and 5.7 times greater in the highest 5.00%. Conclusions. Predictive modeling can identify high-risk patients who were not identified on clinical grounds. VHA is developing modeling to enhance clinical care and to guide the delivery of preventive interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2015.302737

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [20]Research Prioritization Task Force. A Prioritized Research Agenda for Suicide Prevention: An Action Plan to Save Lives. Rockville, MD: National Action Alliance for Suicide Prevention; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. [21]Institute of Medicine. Reducing risks for mental disorders: frontiers for preventive intervention research. In: Mrazek PJ, Haggerty RJ, editors. Committee on Prevention of Mental Disorders, Division of Biobehavorial Sciences and Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1994. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [22]The Assessment and Management of Risk for Suicide Working Group. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Assessment and Management of Patients at Risk for Suicide. Version 1.0. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration and Department of Defense; 2013. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, J. F., Bossarte, R. M., Katz, I. R., Thompson, C., Kemp, J., Hannemann, C. M., Nielson, C., & Schoenbaum, M.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2015-09
Volume
105
Issue
9
Pages
1935-1942
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1727999343
Cited by
251
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1
FWCI
21.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
suicide risk prediction, suicide prevention, veterans, risk stratification, predictive modeling, Veterans Health Administration, medical records, National Death Index, high-risk patients
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Suicide, United States, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review