Cited by 13ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Study of a Successful ERP Implementation Using an Extended Information Systems Success Model in Cameroon Universities: Case of CUCA

Wanko, Chris Emmanuel Tchatchouang, Kamdjoug, Jean Robert Kala, Wamba, Samuel Fosso·2019·Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-16181-1_68

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wanko, C. E. T., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., & Wamba, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of Central Africa (CM)
  • Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR)
Corresponding author
Kamdjoug, Jean Robert Kala
Venue
Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Published
2019
Pages
727-737
ISSN
  • 2194-5357 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5365
OpenAlex
W2923647151
Cited by
13
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in intelligent systems and computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
ERP implementation, DeLone and McLean model, higher education, university information systems, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, user satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review