Cited by 165Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

Naive-Student: Leveraging Semi-Supervised Learning in Video Sequences for Urban Scene Segmentation

Open access
Chen, Liang-Chieh, Lopes, Raphael Gontijo, Cheng, Bowen, Collins, Maxwell D., Cubuk, Ekin D., Zoph, Barret, Adam, Hartwig, Shlens, Jonathon·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-58545-7_40

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MultiMAE falls behind DINO and MoCo-v3 on ImageNet-C.

    “It also performs better than MAE on ImageNet-C, but falls behind DINO [12] and MoCo-v3 [17].”

    From MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoders (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results (pp. 7–8) compare urban-scene segmentation methods on Cityscapes, while the ImageNet-1K results (p. 12) compare WR-38 and WR-41. Searches for MultiMAE, DINO, MoCo-v3, and ImageNet-C found no passage comparing their ImageNet-C performance. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [30]30. Hinton, G., Vinyals, O., Dean, J.: Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 (2015) 2 · arXiv
  2. [34]34. Iscen, A., Tolias, G., Avrithis, Y., Chum, O.: Label propagation for deep semisupervised learning. In: CVPR (2019) 3
  3. [52]52. Liu, W., Rabinovich, A., Berg, A.C.: Parsenet: Looking wider to see better. arXiv:1506.04579 (2015) 7 · arXiv
  4. [63]63. Qi, H., Zhang, Z., Xiao, B., Hu, H., Cheng, B., Wei, Y., Dai, J.: Deformable convolutional networks - COCO detection and segmentation challenge 2017 entry. ICCV COCO Challenge Workshop (2017) 6, 7
  5. [72]72. Shi, W., Gong, Y., Ding, C., MaXiaoyu Tao, Z., Zheng, N.: Transductive semisupervised deep learning using min-max features. In: ECCV (2018) 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L.-C., Lopes, R. G., Cheng, B., Collins, M. D., Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Adam, H., & Shlens, J.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Liang-Chieh
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
695-714
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3110002552
Cited by
165
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 7
FWCI
10.41
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
semi-supervised learning, urban scene segmentation, video sequences, pseudo-labeling, instance segmentation, panoptic segmentation, semantic segmentation, cityscape, label propagation, unlabeled data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review