Cited by 101Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingInternet of Things and AI

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review of Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for the Internet-of-Things

Open access
Briggs, Christopher, Fan, Zhong, Andras, Peter·2021·Studies in Computational Intelligence

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-70604-3_2

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Gartner, Gartner identifies top 10 strategic IoT technologies and trends (2018). https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-11-07-gartner-identifies-top-10-strategic-iot-technologies-and-trends
  2. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep Learning, 1st edn. (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016)
  3. K. Hsieh, A. Harlap, N. Vijaykumar, D. Konomis, G.R. Ganger, P.B. Gibbons, Gaia: geo-distributed machine learning approaching LAN speeds, in NSDI (2017), pp. 629–647
  4. Y. Liang, M.F. Balcan, V. Kanchanapally, Distributed PCA and k-means clustering, in The Big Learning Workshop at NIPS (2013)
  5. Analyzing federated Learning through an adversarial lens, in PMLR, May (2019)
  6. S. Han, J. Pool, J. Tran, W. Dally, Learning both weights and connections for efficient neural network, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2015), pp. 1135–1143
  7. European Commision, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European parliament and of the council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Off. J. Eur. Union L119, 1–88 (2016)
  8. O. Goldreich, Secure multi-party computation. Manuscript. Preliminary version, vol. 78 (1998)
  9. N. Papernot, M. Abadi, Ú. Erlingsson, I. Goodfellow, K. Talwar, Semi-supervised knowledge transfer for deep learning from private training data (2016), arXiv:1610.05755 · arXiv
  10. N. Papernot, S. Song, I. Mironov, A. Raghunathan, K. Talwar, Ú. Erlingsson, Scalable private learning with PATE (2018), arXiv:1802.08908 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 101

Metadata

Authors
Briggs, C., Fan, Z., & Andras, P.
Affiliations
Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Briggs, Christopher
Venue
Studies in Computational Intelligence
Published
2021
Pages
21-50
ISSN
  • 1860-949X (ISSN-L)
  • 1860-9503
OpenAlex
W3084130864
Cited by
101
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12
FWCI
28.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in computational intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
Keywords
privacy-preserving federated learning, Internet of Things, data privacy, communication cost reduction, data heterogeneity, user-generated data, distributed learning, deep learning, personal data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review