Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: The rapid growth of social media has transformed marketing communication, particularly through the rise of influencer marketing. As social media influencers increasingly shape consumer attitudes and purchasing decisions, understanding the mechanisms underlying their effectiveness has become an important research concern. While prior research has emphasized trust as a key driver of consumer responses, the underlying relational mechanisms through which influencer credibility translates into purchase intention remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the impact of influencer credibility on consumer purchase intention in the Moroccan context, focusing on the mediating roles of parasocial relationships and trust. Methods: Drawing on Source Credibility Theory and Parasocial Interaction Theory, a conceptual model was developed and empirically tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Data were collected through a structured survey administered to 304 active social media users in Morocco. The proposed model assessed the direct relationships among influencer credibility, parasocial relationships, trust, and purchase intention, as well as the indirect and sequential mediation effects linking these constructs. Results: The results indicate that influencer credibility significantly enhances both parasocial relationships and trust. In addition, parasocial relationships positively influence trust, confirming the importance of emotional and relational bonds between influencers and their followers. Furthermore, a sequential mediation effect is identified, whereby parasocial relationships strengthen trust, ultimately leading to increased purchase intention. Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of relational and emotional mechanisms in explaining influencer effectiveness, particularly in emerging markets. The study contributes to the influencer marketing literature by clarifying how credibility translates into behavioral intentions through interconnected psychological processes. From a managerial perspective, the results suggest that brands should not rely solely on credibility but should also prioritize influencers capable of fostering strong emotional connections with their audience and cultivating trust over time.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study tests a sequential mediation model in which influencer credibility predicts purchase intention through parasocial relationships and trust among Moroccan social media users. Using PLS-SEM on 304 valid survey responses, it finds support for all direct hypotheses and for simple and sequential mediation, while noting borderline discriminant validity between credibility and trust.
Key findings
- Influencer credibility was positively associated with parasocial relationships (β = 0.521, p < .001), trust (β = 0.700, p < .001), and purchase intention (β = 0.183, p = .027).
- Parasocial relationships were positively associated with purchase intention (β = 0.247, p < .001) and trust (β = 0.161, p < .001); trust was positively associated with purchase intention (β = 0.278, p = .001).
- Mediation was supported: IC → PSR → PI (β = 0.129), IC → TR → PI (β = 0.195), and the sequential path IC → PSR → TR → PI (β = 0.023, p = .032).
- Explanatory power was R² = 0.272 for parasocial relationships, R² = 0.633 for trust, and R² = 0.371 for purchase intention; Q² values were PSR = 0.156, TR = 0.402, PI = 0.189.
Methods
- Quantitative cross-sectional survey of Moroccan social media users who follow at least one influencer; 385 responses were obtained, 304 valid responses retained after exclusions.
- Constructs were measured with adapted validated scales on a five-point Likert scale; the questionnaire was administered in French, with a pre-test of 25 respondents.
- Data were analyzed with PLS-SEM using SmartPLS 4.0, including measurement and structural model assessment, bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples, BCa 95% confidence intervals, blindfolding with omission distance 7, and common method bias diagnostics.
Limitations
- The cross-sectional design prevents causal inference; the paper states all relationships should be interpreted as associations or predictive effects rather than causal links.
- The paper reports borderline discriminant validity between influencer credibility and trust (HTMT = 0.933; 95% BCa CI [0.878; 0.988]) and cautions that the large IC → TR effect size (f² = 0.971) may partly reflect conceptual proximity.
- The paper also states limitations from convenience sampling, inclusion of respondents reporting infrequent social media use (25.3% “rarely”), a single national/cultural context (Morocco), self-reported single-source data with possible residual common method bias, and no distinction among influencer types, platforms, or product categories.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 97 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductown data
Most HTMT values were well below 0.90, indicating satisfactory discriminant validity for the majority of construct pairs.
“most HTMT values were well below the conservative threshold of 0.90, indicating satisfactory discriminant validity for the majority of construct pairs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Henseler et al., 2016 source
The discriminant-validity discussion and Table I (pp. 10–12) support using HTMT to assess whether construct pairs are distinct, but specify that HTMT should be significantly smaller than one, not a 0.90 threshold. This guidelines paper does not report the citing study’s HTMT values or establish that most of its construct pairs met the criterion. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous studies consistently demonstrate that parasocial relationships constitute a key relational mechanism shaping consumer responses to influencer marketing.
“Previous studies consistently demonstrate that parasocial relationships constitute a key relational mechanism shaping consumer responses to influencer marketing (Damaj and Nofal, 2026;Gong et al., 2024;Huang and Gong, 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked - Findingreasoning
A sequential mediation effect exists whereby parasocial relationships strengthen trust, ultimately leading to increased purchase intention.
“Furthermore, a sequential mediation effect is identified, whereby parasocial relationships strengthen trust, ultimately leading to increased purchase intention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationships positively influence trust.
“In addition, parasocial relationships positively influence trust, confirming the importance of emotional and relational bonds between influencers and their followers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loadings for parasocial relationship (PSR) ranged from 0.715 to 0.828.
“parasocial relationship (PSR) from 0.715 to 0.828”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Influencer credibility, parasocial relationships, and trust explain 37.1% of the variance in purchase intention (R2 = 0.371).
“influencer credibility, parasocial relationships, and trust explain 37.1% of the variance in purchase intention (R 2 = 0.371)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility explains 27.2% of the variance in parasocial relationships (R2 = 0.272).
“influencer credibility explains 27.2% of the variance in parasocial relationships (R 2 = 0.272)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The indirect effect of IC on TR through PSR is significant [β = 0.084; t = 3.163; p = .002; 95% CI (0.032; 0.137)].
“The indirect effect of IC on TR through PSR is significant [β = 0.084; t = 3.163; p = .002;95% CI (0.032; 0.137)]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loadings for influencer credibility (IC) ranged from 0.781 to 0.855.
“loadings for influencer credibility (IC) ranged from 0.781 to 0.855”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of IC on TR is very large (f2 = 0.971).
“the effect of IC on TR is very large (f 2 = 0.971).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility is significantly associated with trust [β = 0.700; t = 17.125; p < .001; 95% CI (0.619; 0.776)], supporting H3.
“Influencer credibility is also significantly associated with trust [β = 0.700; t = 17.125; p < .001;95% CI (0.619; 0.776)], supporting H3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loadings for purchase intention (PI) ranged from 0.754 to 0.889.
“purchase intention (PI) from 0.754 to 0.889”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Loadings for trust (TR) ranged from 0.790 to 0.853.
“trust (TR) from 0.790 to 0.853”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationships are positively associated with trust [β = 0.161; t = 3.549; p < .001; 95% CI (0.071; 0.250)], supporting H5.
“and with trust [β = 0.161; t = 3.549; p < .001;95% CI (0.071; 0.250)], supporting H5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility is positively and significantly associated with parasocial relationships [β = 0.521; t = 9.884; p < .001; 95% CI (0.413; 0.627)], supporting H2.
“influencer credibility is positively and significantly associated with parasocial relationships [β = 0.521; t = 9.884; p < .001;95% CI (0.413; 0.627)], supporting H2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of IC on PSR is large (f2 = 0.373).
“The effect of IC on PSR is large (f 2 = 0.373)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals for the HTMT value between IC and TR were [0.878; 0.988].
“Bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (BCa, 5,000 resamples) for this value were [0.878; 0.988].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trust shows a positive and significant association with purchase intention [β = 0.278; t = 3.290; p = .001; 95% CI (0.112; 0.444)], supporting H6.
“trust shows a positive and significant association with purchase intention [β = 0.278; t = 3.290; p = .001;95% CI (0.112; 0.444)], supporting H6.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The sequential indirect effect of IC on PI through PSR and then TR is significant [β = 0.023; t = 2.143; p = .032; 95% CI (0.003; 0.046)], supporting H9.
“The sequential indirect effect of IC on PI through PSR and then TR is significant [β = 0.023; t = 2.143; p = .032;95% CI (0.003; 0.046)], supporting H9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility shows a direct positive association with purchase intention [β = 0.183; t = 2.210; p = .027; 95% CI (0.021; 0.342)], supporting H1.
“influencer credibility shows a direct positive association with purchase intention [β = 0.183; t = 2.210; p = .027;95% CI (0.021; 0.342)], supporting H1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PSR exerts a significant indirect effect on PI through TR [β = 0.045; t = 2.341; p = .019; 95% CI (0.008; 0.083)].
“Additionally, PSR exerts a significant indirect effect on PI through TR [β = 0.045; t = 2.341; p = .019;95% CI (0.008; 0.083)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility and parasocial relationships explain 63.3% of the variance in trust (R2 = 0.633).
“influencer credibility and parasocial relationships explain 63.3% of the variance in trust (R 2 = 0.633)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The indirect effect of IC on PI through PSR is significant [β = 0.129; t = 3.942; p < .001; 95% CI (0.065; 0.193)], supporting H7.
“The indirect effect of IC on PI through PSR is also significant [β = 0.129; t = 3.942; p < .001;95% CI (0.065; 0.193)], supporting H7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationships are positively associated with purchase intention [β = 0.247; t = 4.068; p < .001; 95% CI (0.128; 0.365)], supporting H4.
“Parasocial relationships are positively associated with purchase intention [β = 0.247; t = 4.068; p < .001;95% CI (0.128; 0.365)], supporting H4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trust has a positive effect on purchase intention (β = 0.278, p = .001).
“| H6 | TR → PI | 0.278 | 3.290 | .001 | [0.112; 0.444] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationship mediates the effect of influencer credibility on trust (indirect β = 0.084, p = .002).
“| IC → PSR → TR | 0.084 | 3.163 | .002 | | [0.032; 0.137] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trust mediates the effect of parasocial relationship on purchase intention (indirect β = 0.045, p = .019).
“| PSR → TR → PI | 0.045 | 2.341 | .019 | | [0.008; 0.083] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationship mediates the effect of influencer credibility on purchase intention (indirect β = 0.129, p < .001).
“| IC → PSR → PI | 0.129 | 3.942 | <.001 | | [0.065; 0.193] | Supported (H7) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility has a positive effect on trust (β = 0.700, p < .001).
“| H3 | IC → TR | 0.700 | 17.125 | <.001 | [0.619; 0.776] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Trust mediates the effect of influencer credibility on purchase intention (indirect β = 0.195, p = .001).
“| IC → TR → PI | 0.195 | 3.215 | .001 | | [0.076; 0.316] | Supported (H8) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility has a positive effect on parasocial relationship (β = 0.521, p < .001).
“| H2 | IC → PSR | 0.521 | 9.884 | <.001 | [0.413; 0.627] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationship has a positive effect on trust (β = 0.161, p < .001).
“| H5 | PSR → TR | 0.161 | 3.549 | <.001 | [0.071; 0.250] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationship has a positive effect on purchase intention (β = 0.247, p < .001).
“| H4 | PSR → PI | 0.247 | 4.068 | <.001 | [0.128; 0.365] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Influencer credibility has a positive direct effect on purchase intention (β = 0.183, p = .027).
“| H1 | IC → PI | 0.183 | 2.210 | .027 | [0.021; 0.342] | Supported |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Parasocial relationship and trust sequentially mediate the effect of influencer credibility on purchase intention (indirect β = 0.023, p = .032).
“| IC → PSR → TR → PI | 0.023 | 2.143 | .032 | | [0.003; 0.046] | Supported (H9) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention is not purely direct.
“However, this relationship is not purely direct (Domguia and Evina, 2025;Ghandour and Touhami, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Online promotional cues can influence purchase intentions through intermediate psychological mechanisms such as mental simulation and perceived value.
“More recent evidence also shows that online promotional cues can influence purchase intentions through intermediate psychological mechanisms such as mental simulation and perceived value (Laghari et al., 2026).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Laghari et al., 2026 source
- Premisecitation
Bi and Zhang (2022) demonstrate that parasocial relationships mediate the effect of credibility on purchase intentions.
“Bi and Zhang (2022) demonstrate that parasocial relationships mediate the effect of credibility on purchase intentions, while Reinikainen et al. (2020) show that audience comments moderate this process by reinforcing parasocial bonds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bi and Zhang, 2022 source
- Premisecitation
Trust significantly influences purchase intention by reducing perceived risk and facilitating consumers' transition from evaluation to behavioral intention.
“Previous empirical studies confirm that trust significantly influences purchase intention by reducing perceived risk and facilitating consumers' transition from evaluation to behavioral intention (Li et al., 2025;Yasin et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yasin et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Interpretationcitation
The pathway from credibility to purchase intention is mediated by relational and psychological processes, rather than being purely direct.
“These studies collectively suggest that the pathway from credibility to purchase intention is mediated by relational and psychological processes, rather than being purely direct.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Trust acts as an essential mechanism through which influencer-related characteristics translate into consumer purchase responses.
“Therefore, trust acts as an essential mechanism through which influencer-related characteristics translate into consumer purchase responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Credible influencers are more likely to establish strong emotional connections with their audience, facilitating the development of parasocial relationships.
“Credible influencers are more likely to establish strong emotional connections with their audience, facilitating the development of parasocial relationships (Hwang and Zhang, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hwang and Zhang, 2018 source
- Premisecitation
Parasocial relationships further reinforce trust by creating perceived proximity and authenticity.
“Parasocial relationships further reinforce trust by creating perceived proximity and authenticity (Yi, 2023), suggesting that consumer responses to influencer marketing are driven by both cognitive and emotional mechanisms operating sequentially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Parasocial relationships facilitate the development of trust.
“Beyond their direct effect on purchase intention, parasocial relationships also facilitate the development of trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The proximity between IC and TR reflects the known overlap between source trustworthiness, embedded as a dimension of credibility in the Ohanian (1990) framework, and trust as a relational construct.
“Conceptually, this proximity reflects the known overlap between source trustworthiness, embedded as a dimension of credibility in the Ohanian (1990) framework, and trust as a relational construct.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ohanian, 1990 source
- Premisenone given
According to Parasocial Interaction Theory, repeated exposure to influencer-generated content fosters emotional attachment, familiarity, and perceived intimacy, making consumers more receptive to influencers' opinions and recommendations.
“According to Parasocial Interaction Theory, repeated exposure to influencergenerated content fosters emotional attachment, familiarity, and perceived intimacy, making consumers more receptive to influencers' opinions and recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In social media environments, parasocial relationships are strengthened through continuous interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived intimacy between influencers and their followers.
“In social media environments, these relationships are strengthened through continuous interaction, self disclosure, and perceived intimacy between influencers and their followers (Hwang and Zhang, 2018;Tukachinsky, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hwang and Zhang, 2018 source
- cites Tukachinsky, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Parasocial relationships mediate the credibility-trust relationship.
“confirming that parasocial relationships mediate the credibility-trust relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Given the study's primary focus on variance explanation and predictive relevance across multiple endogenous constructs, PLS-SEM was retained as the most appropriate analytical approach.
“Given the study's primary focus on variance explanation and predictive relevance across multiple endogenous constructs, PLS-SEM was retained as the most appropriate analytical approach (Sarstedt et al., 2021).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sarstedt et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
The square root of the AVE for each construct exceeds its highest correlation with any other construct, providing additional evidence of discriminant validity at the construct level.
“the square root of the AVE for each construct exceeds its highest correlation with any other construct, providing additional evidence of discriminant validity at the construct level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fornell and Larcker, 1981 source
- Premisecitation
Influencer credibility directly strengthens consumers' trust by enhancing perceptions of expertise, honesty, and reliability.
“While influencer credibility directly strengthens consumers' trust by enhancing perceptions of expertise, honesty, and reliability, parasocial relationships further reinforce trust through the development of emotional closeness, familiarity, and perceived authenticity (Masuda et al., 2022;Yi, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Given the cross-sectional design, all estimated path coefficients should be interpreted as predictive associations rather than causal relationships.
“Given the cross-sectional design of this study, all estimated path coefficients should be interpreted as predictive associations rather than causal relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rindfleisch et al., 2008 source
- Interpretationcitation
Following Zhao et al. (2010), this pattern is consistent with complementary partial mediation, as both the direct and indirect effects are positive and significant.
“Following Zhao et al. (2010), this pattern is consistent with complementary partial mediation, as both the direct and indirect effects are positive and significant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al., 2010 source
- Interpretationown data
All six direct hypotheses are supported.
“All six direct hypotheses are thus supported.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
This trust R2 result should be interpreted with caution given the limited discriminant validity observed between influencer credibility and trust in the HTMT analysis.
“However, this result should be interpreted with caution given the limited discriminant validity observed between influencer credibility and trust in the HTMT analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Parasocial relationships further reinforce trust through the development of emotional closeness, familiarity, and perceived authenticity.
“While influencer credibility directly strengthens consumers' trust by enhancing perceptions of expertise, honesty, and reliability, parasocial relationships further reinforce trust through the development of emotional closeness, familiarity, and perceived authenticity (Masuda et al., 2022;Yi, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Masuda et al., 2022 source
- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Parasocial relationships represent an important affective pathway linking influencer credibility to consumers' behavioral intentions.
“Accordingly, parasocial relationships represent an important affective pathway linking influencer credibility to consumers' behavioral intentions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The large f2 effect size (0.971) may partly reflect conceptual proximity between IC and TR rather than a purely discriminant substantive effect.
“the large f 2 effect size (0.971) may partly reflect conceptual proximity between the two constructs rather than a purely discriminant substantive effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The HTMT value of 0.933 suggests that respondents may perceive influencer credibility and trust as closely related concepts in the present context.
“The HTMT value of 0.933 therefore suggests that respondents may perceive influencer credibility and trust as closely related concepts in the present context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
PLS-SEM was selected based primarily on the study's explanatory-predictive objective rather than on the presence of mediation alone.
“PLS-SEM was selected based primarily on the study's explanatory-predictive objective rather than on the presence of mediation alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The magnitude of the HTMT ratio indicates borderline discriminant validity between influencer credibility and trust.
“the magnitude of the HTMT ratio indicates borderline discriminant validity between influencer credibility and trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Common method bias was addressed through both procedural and statistical measures.
“Common method bias (CMB) was addressed through both procedural and statistical measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
PLS-SEM is appropriate in this context because it estimates the relationships among latent variables while emphasizing explained variance and predictive relevance.
“PLS-SEM is appropriate in this context because it estimates the relationships among latent variables while emphasizing explained variance and predictive relevance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sarstedt et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
It may indicate that respondents in the present context perceive credibility and trust as closely related evaluations of the influencer.
“Rather, it may indicate that respondents in the present context perceive credibility and trust as closely related evaluations of the influencer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The HTMT value of 0.933 and the large effect size for the IC → TR path (f2 = 0.971) suggest that these constructs, as currently operationalized, share substantial empirical variance.
“The HTMT value of 0.933 and the large effect size for the IC → TR path (f 2 = 0.971) suggest that these constructs, as currently operationalized, share substantial empirical variance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
When consumers perceive an influencer as credible, they are more likely to interpret personal disclosures and engagement behaviors as genuine, thereby fostering a sense of closeness and emotional attachment consistent with parasocial interaction theory.
“When consumers perceive an influencer as credible, they are more likely to interpret personal disclosures and engagement behaviors as genuine, thereby fostering a sense of closeness and emotional attachment consistent with parasocial interaction theory”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartmann and Goldhoorn, 2011 source
- Interpretationown data
This contributes to theory-building by clarifying that the influence process involves a theorized progression from cognitive evaluation to emotional engagement to dispositional trust to behavioral intent.
“This contributes to theory-building by clarifying that the influence process involves a theorized progression from cognitive evaluation to emotional engagement to dispositional trust to behavioral intent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The empirical proximity of influencer credibility and trust suggests that respondents may perceive the two as closely related concepts in the present context.
“This empirical proximity suggests that respondents may perceive influencer credibility and trust as closely related concepts in the present context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The association between parasocial relationships and trust confirms that emotional closeness contributes to building trust beyond what credibility alone can explain.
“The association between parasocial relationships and trust is particularly theoretically significant: it confirms that emotional closeness contributes to building trust beyond what credibility alone can explain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Masuda et al., 2022 source
- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
According to the ANRT (2023), a significant proportion of Moroccan internet users express concerns about the security and reliability of online transactions.
“According to the ANRT (2023), a significant proportion of Moroccan internet users express concerns about the security and reliability of online transactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites ANRT, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The partial nature of mediation, with the direct IC → PI path remaining significant, further suggests that credibility operates through both direct and indirect channels.
“The partial nature of mediation; with the direct IC → PI path remaining significant; further suggests that credibility operates through both direct and indirect channels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
By providing empirical evidence from Morocco, the study contributes to the growing body of work extending influencer marketing research to emerging market contexts.
“Fifth, by providing empirical evidence from Morocco, the study contributes to the growing body of work extending influencer marketing research to emerging market contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The strength of the IC → TR relationship should not be interpreted solely as evidence of a strong substantive effect.
“Thus, the strength of the IC → TR relationship should not be interpreted solely as evidence of a strong substantive effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The finding that trust predicts purchase intention (β = 0.278) is particularly relevant in the Moroccan digital commerce context.
“The finding that trust predicts purchase intention (β = 0.278) is also particularly relevant in the Moroccan digital commerce context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The sequential mediation model (IC → PSR → TR → PI) extends prior mediation models that examined credibility and parasocial relationships as independent mediators by proposing and empirically testing their theorized sequential ordering.
“Third, the sequential mediation model (IC → PSR → TR → PI) extends prior mediation models that examined credibility and parasocial relationships as independent mediators (Bi and Zhang, 2022;Sharkasi and Rezakhah, 2023) by proposing and empirically testing their theorized sequential ordering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bi and Zhang, 2022 source
- cites Sharkasi and Rezakhah, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
In such cultural environments, consumers may be particularly attentive to the relational quality of influencer interactions, perceiving influencers who share personal content and engage authentically as embedded within a quasi-social network rather than as commercial intermediaries.
“In such cultural environments, consumers may be particularly attentive to the relational quality of influencer interactions, perceiving influencers who share personal content and engage authentically with their audiences as embedded within a quasi-social network rather than as commercial intermediaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
When consumers develop a sense of closeness with an influencer, they are more likely to interpret recommendations as personally relevant and sincere.
“When consumers develop a sense of closeness with an influencer; perceiving them as a trusted friend rather than a distant celebrity; they are more likely to interpret recommendations as personally relevant and sincere.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By integrating source credibility theory and parasocial interaction theory within a unified sequential framework, the study provides a more comprehensive account of how influencers shape consumer purchase intentions than models focusing on a single mechanism.
“First, by integrating source credibility theory and parasocial interaction theory within a unified sequential framework, the study provides a more comprehensive account of how influencers shape consumer purchase intentions than models focusing on a single mechanism.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Influencer credibility emerges as the foundational driver of the influence process, operating simultaneously through direct and relational pathways.
“Influencer credibility emerges as the foundational driver of the influence process, operating simultaneously through direct and relational pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In such an environment, trust built through influencer relationships may function as a substitute for the institutional trust mechanisms that characterize more mature e-commerce markets, providing consumers with the relational confidence necessary to transition from information search to purchase intention.
“In such an environment, trust built through influencer relationships may function as a substitute for the institutional trust mechanisms that characterize more mature e-commerce markets, providing consumers with the relational confidence necessary to transition from information search to purchase intention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Morocco's moderately collectivist cultural orientation suggests that interpersonal bonds, perceived relational closeness, and community-based social influence play a more prominent role in consumer decision-making than in more individualist contexts.
“Morocco's moderately collectivist cultural orientation suggests that interpersonal bonds, perceived relational closeness, and community-based social influence play a more prominent role in consumer decision-making than in more individualist contexts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites De Mooij and Hofstede, 2011 source
- Interpretationreasoning
In the Moroccan context, credible influencers may be particularly effective at cultivating parasocial bonds, as their credibility reinforces the perception of a genuine, friendship-like relationship.
“In the Moroccan , 2011), credible influencers may be particularly effective at cultivating parasocial bonds, as their credibility reinforces the perception of a genuine, friendship-like relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The full impact of influencer credibility on purchase intentions is realized through the sequential development of parasocial bonds and trust.
“the full impact of influencer credibility on purchase intentions is realized through the sequential development of parasocial bonds and trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The study was conducted in a single cultural and national context, Morocco, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other markets.
“Fourth, the study was conducted in a single cultural and national context, Morocco, which while representing an original contribution limits the generalizability of findings to other markets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The influence of influencer marketing campaigns on consumer purchase intentions may not be fully realized in the short term, because parasocial bonds and trust develop progressively through repeated exposure and interaction.
“This suggests that the influence of influencer marketing campaigns on consumer purchase intentions may not be fully realized in the short term, as parasocial bonds and trust develop progressively through repeated exposure and interaction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 65
- May combine two claims. 69
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTrust represents a complementary relational mechanism that reflects consumers' willingness to rely on an influencer's recommendations by reducing uncertainty and perceived risk.
“Trust represents a complementary relational mechanism that reflects consumers' willingness to rely on an influencer's recommendations by reducing uncertainty and perceived risk (Azzouzi and Naoui, 2025;Lou and Yuan, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Azzouzi and Naoui, 2025 source
In the paper’s section labeled “Mots” (page not available), Azzouzi and Naoui say that a trusted influencer may lessen perceived purchase risk and discuss the importance of consumer trust. The passages do not define trust as willingness to rely on recommendations or describe it as a complementary relational mechanism that reduces uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Lou and Yuan, 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe operationalization of influencer credibility using Ohanian's items has been widely adopted in previous influencer marketing studies.
“This operationalization has been widely adopted in previous influencer marketing studies (Lou and Yuan, 2019;Martiningsih and Setyawan, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis sequence reflects a progression from cognitive appraisal to affective engagement to dispositional trust to behavioral intent, consistent with recent empirical findings.
“This sequence reflects a progression from cognitive appraisal to affective engagement to dispositional trust to behavioral intent, consistent with recent empirical findings from Sharkasi and Rezakhah (2023) and Tripopsakul and Hoonsopon (2025).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Sharkasi and Rezakhah, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Tripopsakul and Hoonsopon, 2025 source
The Structural Model Assessment reports a significant path from influencer credibility through parasocial relationships to purchase intention, supporting a progression from credibility to emotional engagement to behavioral intent. It does not test dispositional trust as a separate stage after emotional engagement; trustworthiness is instead a component of the initial credibility measure (Assessment of the Lower-Order Constructs). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataInfluencer credibility significantly enhances both parasocial relationships and trust.
“The results indicate that influencer credibility significantly enhances both parasocial relationships and trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe indirect effect of IC on PI through TR is significant [β = 0.195; t = 3.215; p = .001; 95% CI (0.076; 0.316)], supporting H8.
“The indirect effect of IC on PI through TR is significant [β = 0.195; t = 3.215; p = .001;95% CI (0.076; 0.316)], supporting H8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe HTMT value between influencer credibility (IC) and trust (TR) was 0.933, exceeding both 0.85 and 0.90.
“the HTMT value between influencer credibility (IC) and trust (TR) was 0.933, exceeding both the conservative threshold of 0.85 and the more lenient threshold of 0.90”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Henseler et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataA total of 385 questionnaire responses were obtained.
“A total of 385 questionnaire responses were obtained.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataApproximately 25.3% of respondents reported using social media 'rarely'.
“Approximately 25.3% of respondents reported using social media”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe retained valid responses correspond to 79.0% of the initial responses obtained (304/385).
“This corresponds to 79.0% of the initial responses obtained (304/385).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReinikainen et al. (2020) show that audience comments moderate the process by reinforcing parasocial bonds.
“Bi and Zhang (2022) demonstrate that parasocial relationships mediate the effect of credibility on purchase intentions, while Reinikainen et al. (2020) show that audience comments moderate this process by reinforcing parasocial bonds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reinikainen et al., 2020 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationInfluencer credibility is positively associated with purchase intention.
“Empirical studies consistently show that influencer credibility is positively associated with purchase intention (Martiningsih and Setyawan, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInfluencer credibility predicts higher trust levels, which in turn facilitate purchase intentions.
“They also predict higher trust levels, which in turn facilitate purchase intentions (Lou and Yuan, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lou and Yuan, 2019 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConsumers who perceive influencers as psychologically close tend to evaluate their recommendations as more authentic and sincere, thereby strengthening interpersonal trust and increasing purchase likelihood.
“Consumers who perceive influencers as psychologically close tend to evaluate their recommendations as more authentic and sincere, thereby strengthening interpersonal trust and increasing purchase likelihood (Masuda et al., 2022;Yi, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Masuda et al., 2022 source
- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior research consistently shows that influencer credibility predicts trust, which in turn predicts purchase intention.
“Prior research consistently shows that influencer credibility predicts trust, which in turn predicts purchase intention (Lou and Yuan, 2019;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMasuda et al. (2022) identify characterizations as key mediating mechanisms.
“Tripopsakul and Hoonsopon (2025) confirm that credibility and parasocial relationships jointly predict purchase intentions through both emotional and cognitive pathways, while Masuda et al. (2022) identify characterizations as key mediating mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Masuda et al., 2022 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals who develop strong parasocial relationships are more likely to engage with influencer content, adopt product recommendations, and form favorable purchase intentions.
“Consequently, individuals who develop strong parasocial relationships are more likely to engage with influencer content, adopt product recommendations, and form favorable purchase intentions (Sokolova and Kefi, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sokolova and Kefi, 2020 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTrust reduces perceived risk and facilitates decision-making in digital environments characterized by uncertainty.
“In digital environments characterized by uncertainty, trust reduces perceived risk and facilitates decision-making (Yasin et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yasin et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTripopsakul and Hoonsopon (2025) confirm that credibility and parasocial relationships jointly predict purchase intentions through both emotional and cognitive pathways.
“Tripopsakul and Hoonsopon (2025) confirm that credibility and parasocial relationships jointly predict purchase intentions through both emotional and cognitive pathways, while Masuda et al. (2022) identify characterizations as key mediating mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tripopsakul and Hoonsopon, 2025 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKoay et al. (2024) validate a sequential mediation model in which self-influencer congruence predicts parasocial relationships, which then predict credibility and purchase intentions.
“Koay et al. (2024) validate a sequential mediation model in which self-influencer congruence predicts parasocial relationships, which then predict credibility and purchase intentions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Koay et al., 2024 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationConsumer responses to influencer marketing are driven by both cognitive and emotional mechanisms operating sequentially.
“Parasocial relationships further reinforce trust by creating perceived proximity and authenticity (Yi, 2023), suggesting that consumer responses to influencer marketing are driven by both cognitive and emotional mechanisms operating sequentially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSun et al. (2025) found that social media celebrity credibility positively influences followers' online purchase intentions, with follower loyalty serving as a mediator.
“Sun et al. (2025) found that social media celebrity credibility, conceptualized through attractiveness, trustworthiness, and expertise, positively influences followers' online purchase intentions, with follower loyalty serving as a mediator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sun et al., 2025 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData collection was conducted over a six-week period, from 15 February to 2 April 2026.
“Data collection was conducted over a six-week period, from 15 February to 2 April 2026.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAll AVE values ranged from 0.604 to 0.698, surpassing 0.50, confirming adequate convergent validity.
“all AVE values ranged from 0.604 to 0.698, surpassing the threshold of 0.50, which confirms adequate convergent validity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fornell and Larcker, 1981 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationInfluencer credibility was measured using four items adapted from Ohanian (1990), representing the three dimensions of source credibility.
“Influencer credibility (IC) was measured using four items adapted from Ohanian (1990).The selected items represent the three dimensions of source credibility; expertise, trustworthiness as a source attribute, and attractiveness; while being adapted to the context of social media influencer marketing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ohanian, 1990 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationParasocial relationships were measured using items adapted from Tukachinsky (2010), which assess perceived closeness and emotional attachment between audiences and media figures.
“Parasocial relationships (PSR) were measured using items adapted from Tukachinsky (2010), which assess perceived closeness and emotional attachment between audiences and media figures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tukachinsky, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningMinor wording adaptations were introduced to align the scales with the social media influencer marketing context while preserving the conceptual meaning of the original measures.
“Minor wording adaptations were introduced to align the scales with the social media influencer marketing context while preserving the conceptual meaning of the original measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTrust may mediate the relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention both directly and through the relational influence of parasocial relationships.
“Consequently, trust may mediate the relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention both directly and through the relational influence of parasocial relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationPurchase intention was measured using five items adapted from Dodds et al. (1991), reflecting consumers' intentions to purchase products recommended by social media influencers.
“Finally, purchase intention (PI) was measured using five items adapted from Dodds et al. (1991), reflecting consumers' intentions to purchase products recommended by social media influencers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dodds et al., 1991 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenData were collected through an online questionnaire distributed via Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and a QR code.
“Data were collected through an online questionnaire distributed via Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp, and a QR code that enabled direct smartphone access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe final trust construct was measured using four items that demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties.
“Consequently, the final trust construct was measured using four items that demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationConsumers may develop a sense of familiarity and emotional attachment, which enhances engagement and receptivity to influencer content.
“As a result, consumers may develop a sense of familiarity and emotional attachment, which enhances engagement and receptivity to influencer content (Yi, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThese participants were retained because they indicated following at least one influencer and being exposed to influencer-generated promotional content.
“These participants were nevertheless retained because they indicated following at least one influencer and being exposed to influencer-generated promotional content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationTrust was initially measured using five items adapted from Gefen et al. (2003), capturing consumers' confidence in and willingness to rely on influencers' recommendations.
“Trust (TR) was initially measured using five items adapted from Gefen et al. (2003), capturing consumers' confidence in and willingness to rely on influencers' recommendations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gefen et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThis very large effect size should be interpreted with caution, as the marginal HTMT value between IC and TR.
“As discussed in the discriminant validity assessment, this very large effect size should be interpreted with caution, as the marginal HTMT value between IC and TR”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationParasocial interaction theory explains the formation of one-sided relationships between audiences and media figures.
“In addition, this study mobilizes parasocial interaction theory, which explains the formation of one-sided relationships between audiences and media figures (Hartmann and Goldhoorn, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartmann and Goldhoorn, 2011 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSince the direct effect of IC on PI remains significant after introducing the mediators, the model exhibits partial mediation: influencer credibility predicts purchase intention both directly and indirectly through parasocial relationships and trust.
“Since the direct effect of IC on PI remains significant after introducing the mediators (β = 0.183; p = .027),the model exhibits partial mediation: influencer credibility predicts purchase intention both directly and indirectly through parasocial relationships and trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSource credibility theory posits that the effectiveness of a persuasive message depends on the perceived credibility of its source.
“Source credibility theory posits that the effectiveness of a persuasive message depends on the perceived credibility of its source (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hovland and Weiss, 1951 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningLower exposure frequency may influence the intensity of influencer effects, which is acknowledged as a limitation.
“However, this characteristic is acknowledged as a limitation, as lower exposure frequency may influence the intensity of influencer effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe final questionnaire was administered in French.
“The final questionnaire was administered in French, while the manuscript was subsequently written in English.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThis constitutes a limitation of the study and warrants cautious interpretation of the strong IC → TR relationship.
“This constitutes a limitation of the study and warrants cautious interpretation of the strong IC → TR relationship.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataComposite reliability values ranged from 0.859 to 0.920, exceeding 0.70, confirming the reliability of the constructs.
“Composite reliability values ranged from 0.859 to 0.920, exceeding the recommended level of 0.70, thus confirming the reliability of the constructs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTaken together with the HTMT results, discriminant validity is considered generally adequate, with the noted exception of the IC-TR boundary.
“Taken together with the HTMT results, discriminant validity is considered generally adequate, with the noted exception of the IC-TR boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBased on pre-test feedback, three items were reformulated for greater clarity, and the survey instructions were simplified.
“Based on their feedback, three items were reformulated for greater clarity, and the survey instructions were simplified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo missing data were identified among the retained responses.
“No missing data were identified among the retained responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe purchase intention scale has been extensively validated in consumer behavior and influencer marketing research.
“This scale has been extensively validated in consumer behavior and influencer marketing research (Martiningsih and Setyawan, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martiningsih and Setyawan, 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLower exposure frequency may attenuate the strength of influencer effects, and this is acknowledged as a limitation.
“lower exposure frequency may attenuate the strength of influencer effects, and this is acknowledged as a limitation of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenParticipation was voluntary, anonymous, and without financial compensation.
“Participation was voluntary, anonymous, and without financial compensation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAfter removing TR3, all remaining loadings ranged between 0.715 and 0.889, confirming adequate reliability.
“After its removal, all remaining loadings ranged between 0.715 and 0.889, confirming adequate reliability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationData were analyzed using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4.0.
“Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS 4.0 (Ringle et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ringle et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe target population consisted of Moroccan social media users who follow at least one social media influencer.
“The target population consisted of Moroccan social media users who follow at least one social media influencer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe approach permits the simultaneous assessment of direct, specific indirect, and sequential indirect effects within the proposed nomological network.
“The approach also permits the simultaneous assessment of direct, specific indirect, and sequential indirect effects within the proposed nomological network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe measurement items were originally developed in English and translated into French prior to data collection to ensure adequate comprehension among the target population.
“The measurement items were originally developed in English and adapted from previously validated scales.As the questionnaire was administered to Moroccan respondents in French, the original English items were translated into French prior to data collection to ensure adequate comprehension among the target population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll indicator loadings exceeded 0.70, indicating satisfactory indicator reliability.
“all loadings exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.70, indicating satisfactory indicator reliability”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
- cites Sarstedt et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSource trustworthiness is a cognitive evaluation of a message source performed at the point of exposure, whereas trust is a relational belief developed over time through repeated interactions with an influencer.
“source trustworthiness is a cognitive evaluation of a message source performed at the point of exposure, whereas trust in the present study refers to a relational belief developed over time through repeated interactions with an influencer”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataItem TR3 had a loading of 0.594 and was removed to improve the model.
“item TR3 showed a loading below the recommended threshold (0.594) and was therefore removed to improve the model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningCMB cannot be entirely excluded in cross-sectional single-source designs, and this is acknowledged as a limitation.
“Despite these measures, CMB cannot be entirely excluded in cross-sectional singlesource designs, and this is acknowledged as a limitation of the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA pre-test was conducted with 25 respondents representative of the target population.
“A pre-test was conducted with 25 respondents representative of the target population.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe measurement model exhibits satisfactory reliability and convergent validity.
“Overall, these results demonstrate that the measurement model exhibits satisfactory reliability and convergent validity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe translated items were reviewed by researchers familiar with marketing and consumer behavior to identify potential ambiguities, ensure semantic clarity and conceptual equivalence, and assess their appropriateness for the target respondents.
“The translated items were reviewed by researchers familiar with marketing and consumer behavior to identify potential ambiguities, ensure semantic clarity and conceptual equivalence, and assess their appropriateness for the target respondents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe proposed model provides satisfactory explanatory power while supporting the relevance of the hypothesized relationships.
“Overall, these findings suggest that the proposed model provides satisfactory explanatory power while supporting the relevance of the hypothesized relationships.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataHarman's single-factor test showed the first factor explained 31.2% of total variance, below the 50% threshold, suggesting no single factor dominates and CMB is unlikely to be a major concern.
“the first factor explained 31.2% of total variance, well below the 50% threshold (Podsakoff et al., 2003), suggesting that no single factor dominates the variance structure and that CMB is unlikely to represent a major concern.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Podsakoff et al., 2003 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA nonprobability convenience sampling technique was employed.
“A nonprobability convenience sampling technique was employed, as no comprehensive sampling frame for this population was available, a procedure commonly adopted in digital marketing research (Hair et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
- Rests on an assumption: No comprehensive sampling frame for the target population was available.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningA total of 304 valid responses were retained for analysis.
“After excluding 44 incomplete responses and 37 responses from individuals who indicated that they did not follow any social media influencer, 304 valid responses were retained for analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe parasocial relationship scale has been widely applied in research on social media influencers.
“This scale has been widely applied in research on social media influencers (Hwang and Zhang, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hwang and Zhang, 2018 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCredibility is conceptualized through three dimensions: expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness.
“Credibility is conceptualized through three dimensions: expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness (Ohanian, 1990).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ohanian, 1990 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe IC-TR association should be interpreted with caution given the marginal HTMT value between these two constructs.
“though this association should be interpreted with caution given the marginal HTMT value between these two constructs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAll constructs were measured using validated scales adapted from prior literature to fit the context of social media influencer marketing in Morocco.
“All constructs were measured using validated scales adapted from prior literature to fit the context of social media influencer marketing in Morocco.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis finding confirms the existence of a sequential psychological process in which influencer credibility strengthens parasocial relationships, which in turn reinforce trust, ultimately enhancing purchase intention.
“This finding confirms the existence of a sequential psychological process in which influencer credibility strengthens parasocial relationships, which in turn reinforce trust, ultimately enhancing purchase intention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationItem TR3 was removed because its standardized loading (0.594) was below the recommended threshold of 0.70.
“During the assessment of the measurement model, item TR3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll Cronbach's alpha values exceeded 0.70, indicating satisfactory internal consistency.
“all Cronbach's alpha values exceeded the recommended threshold of 0.70, indicating satisfactory internal consistency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationInfluencers perceived as credible are more likely to foster stronger parasocial relationships, which increase consumers' receptiveness to influencer recommendations and consequently strengthen purchase intention.
“Influencers perceived as credible are more likely to foster stronger parasocial relationships, which increase consumers' receptiveness to influencer recommendations and consequently strengthen purchase intention (Bi and Zhang, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020;Yi, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenTo ensure respondents' eligibility, the questionnaire began with a screening question asking whether participants followed at least one social media influencer and were able to complete the questionnaire in French.
“To ensure respondents' eligibility, the questionnaire began with a screening question asking whether participants followed at least one social media influencer and were able to complete the questionnaire in French.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFull collinearity assessment showed all VIF values below 3.3 (IC=1.82; PSR=1.47; TR=2.31; PI=1.36), confirming absence of pathological collinearity that could indicate common method bias.
“all VIF values obtained were below the threshold of 3.3 (IC = 1.82;PSR = 1.47;TR = 2.31; PI = 1.36), confirming the absence of pathological collinearity that could indicate the presence of common method bias”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kock, 2015 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis cultural dimension may partly explain why parasocial relationships emerge as a strong mediating mechanism in this sample, distinguishing the Moroccan context from Western and East Asian settings.
“This cultural dimension may partly explain why parasocial relationships emerge as a strong mediating mechanism in this sample, a finding that distinguishes the Moroccan context from the Western and East Asian settings”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataProcedural and statistical measures were implemented to mitigate common method bias, including randomized item ordering, guaranteed anonymity, Harman's single-factor test (31.2% of variance explained by the first factor), and a full collinearity assessment in which all construct VIF values were below 3.3.
“Although both procedural and statistical measures were implemented to mitigate this concern, including randomized item ordering, guaranteed anonymity, Harman's single-factor test (31.2% of variance explained by the first factor), and a full collinearity assessment (Kock, 2015) in which all construct VIF values were below 3.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kock, 2015 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFollowing Zhao et al. (2010), this pattern is consistent with complementary partial mediation: consumers with high credibility evaluations may directly translate these assessments into purchase intentions through a peripheral processing route, while simultaneously developing parasocial bonds and trust through a more elaborated relational route.
“Following Zhao et al. (2010), this pattern is consistent with complementary partial mediation: consumers with high credibility evaluations may directly translate these assessments into purchase intentions through a peripheral processing route, while simultaneously developing parasocial bonds and trust through a more elaborated relational route.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zhao et al., 2010 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe finding aligns with prior Moroccan studies and broader international literature while extending them by demonstrating that the credibility-intention link is substantially mediated by relational constructs.
“It also aligns with prior Moroccan studies (Azzouzi and Naoui, 2025;Ghandour and Touhami, 2023) and with the broader international literature (Martiningsih and Setyawan, 2022;Sokolova and Kefi, 2020) while extending them by demonstrating that the credibility-intention link is substantially mediated by relational constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPrior research suggests that the effects of credibility and parasocial relationships may vary across micro-influencers versus macro-influencers, across platforms such as Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, and across product categories such as beauty, fashion, food and technology.
“Prior research suggests that the effects of credibility and parasocial relationships may vary across micro-influencers vs. macroinfluencers, across platforms such as Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube, and across product categories such as beauty, fashion, food, and technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningSince the study measures purchase intention rather than actual purchase behavior, recommendations should be understood in terms of their expected impact on consumers' purchase intentions rather than on confirmed purchasing outcomes.
“It should be noted that, since this study measures purchase intention rather than actual purchase behavior, the following recommendations should be understood in terms of their expected impact on consumers' purchase intentions rather than on confirmed purchasing outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataThe strong association between credibility and parasocial relationships (β = 0.521) confirms that perceived authenticity, competence, and honesty enhance the formation of emotional bonds with influencers.
“The strong association between credibility and parasocial relationships (β = 0.521) confirms that perceived authenticity, competence, and honesty enhance the formation of emotional bonds with influencers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hwang and Zhang, 2018 source
- cites Yi, 2023
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe item TR3 was removed from the final measurement model because its outer loading (0.594) was below the 0.70 threshold.
“a Item removed from the final measurement model due to insufficient outer loading (0.594 < 0.70 threshold; Hair et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior research demonstrates that emotional bonds with influencers enhance receptivity to their recommendations.
“The association between parasocial relationships and purchase intention aligns with prior research demonstrating that emotional bonds with influencers enhance receptivity to their recommendations”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inference, so all relationships are interpreted as associations and predictive effects rather than causal links.
“First, the cross-sectional design does not allow for causal inference.All relationships are interpreted as associations and predictive effects rather than causal links (Rindfleisch et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rindfleisch et al., 2008 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe findings suggest that the sequential credibility → parasocial relationship → trust → purchase intention process is operative in a culturally distinct, emerging digital market, with contextual specificities including the role of collectivist cultural values in amplifying parasocial bonds and trust-based decision-making that distinguish it from Western and East Asian contexts.
“The findings suggest that the sequential credibility → parasocial relationship → trust → purchase intention process is operative in a culturally distinct, emerging digital market, with contextual specificities including the role of collectivist cultural values in amplifying parasocial bonds and trust-based decision-making that distinguish it from Western and East Asian contexts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTrust predicts purchase intention even after controlling for the direct effects of credibility and parasocial relationships, demonstrating its incremental explanatory value as a distinct relational construct and supporting the theoretical decision to include it as a mediator rather than treating it as redundant with credibility.
“The fact that trust predicts purchase intention even after controlling for the direct effects of credibility and parasocial relationships demonstrates its incremental explanatory value as a distinct relational construct, and supports the theoretical decision to include it as a mediator rather than treating it as redundant with credibility.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDespite the caveat, the finding confirms that consumers who perceive influencers as credible develop stronger relational trust dispositions, consistent with the theoretical logic that credibility evaluations update and reinforce trust beliefs over repeated interactions.
“Despite this caveat, the finding confirms that consumers who perceive influencers as credible develop stronger relational trust dispositions, consistent with the theoretical logic that credibility evaluations update and reinforce trust beliefs over repeated interactions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAll Q2 values exceed zero (PSR = 0.156; TR = 0.402; PI = 0.189), confirming that the model demonstrates satisfactory out-of-sample predictive relevance for all endogenous constructs.
“All Q 2 values exceed zero (PSR = 0.156; TR = 0.402; PI = 0.189), confirming that the model demonstrates satisfactory out-of-sample predictive relevance for all endogenous constructs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hair et al., 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe identification of parasocial relationships as a relational antecedent of trust constitutes an original contribution to the understanding of relational mechanisms underlying influencer effectiveness.
“Second, the identification of parasocial relationships as a relational antecedent of trust constitutes an original contribution to the understanding of relational mechanisms underlying influencer effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningInfluencers who share authentic aspects of their daily lives, engage genuinely with followers, and maintain consistent communication styles are more likely to develop the emotional bonds associated with positive purchase intentions and higher trust levels.
“Influencers who share authentic aspects of their daily lives, engage genuinely with their followers, and maintain consistent communication styles are more likely to develop the emotional bonds associated with positive purchase intentions and higher trust levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe large coefficient likely captures both genuine predictive power and partial construct overlap.
“The large coefficient likely captures both genuine predictive power and partial construct overlap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe possibility of residual method variance cannot be entirely excluded in cross-sectional single-source designs.
“the possibility of residual method variance cannot be entirely excluded in cross-sectional singlesource designs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe empirical proximity between influencer credibility and trust (HTMT = 0.933) represents an important measurement limitation and indicates borderline discriminant validity, warranting caution in interpreting the IC → TR path coefficient and its effect size (f2 = 0.971).
“Second, the empirical proximity between influencer credibility and trust (HTMT = 0.933) represents an important measurement limitation.”
- Also stated in: § 8 Limitations and future research directions · hedged
“the magnitude of the HTMT ratio indicates borderline discriminant validity and warrants caution in interpreting the IC → TR path coefficient and the associated effect size (f 2 = 0.971).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 8 Limitations and future research directions · hedged
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe demonstration that credibility, parasocial relationships, and trust operate as interconnected predictors rather than independent drivers advances the theoretical understanding of influence processes in digital environments and responds to calls for more integrative models of influencer effectiveness.
“The demonstration that credibility, parasocial relationships, and trust operate as interconnected predictors; rather than independent drivers; advances the theoretical understanding of influence processes in digital environments and responds to calls for more integrative models of influencer effectiveness”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTrust is associated with purchase intention and mediates the relationships of both influencer credibility and parasocial relationship with purchase intention.
“The results show that trust is associated with purchase intention and plays a mediating role between both credibility and parasocial relationships on the one hand, and purchase intentions on the other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataSource trustworthiness and trust as a relational disposition are theoretically distinct but empirically proximate in the current sample.
“source trustworthiness; operationalized within Ohanian's (1990) credibility scale; and trust as a relational disposition (Gefen et al., 2003) are theoretically distinct but empirically proximate in the current sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe collectivist cultural orientation prevalent in Morocco may amplify the role of parasocial relationships and interpersonal trust in the influence process in ways that do not generalize to individualist cultural contexts.
“The collectivist cultural orientation prevalent in Morocco may amplify the role of parasocial relationships and interpersonal trust in the influence process in ways that do not generalize to individualist cultural contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Morocco has a collectivist cultural orientation.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe large effect size (f2 = 0.971) indicates substantial explanatory power, but it may also partly reflect the conceptual proximity between the two constructs, as suggested by the HTMT value of 0.933.
“The large effect size (f 2 = 0.971) indicates substantial explanatory power, but it may also partly reflect the conceptual proximity between the two constructs, as suggested by the HTMT value of 0.933.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAll constructs were measured using self-reported survey items collected at a single point in time from the same respondents, which introduces the risk of common method bias.
“Fifth, all constructs were measured using self-reported survey items collected at a single point in time from the same respondents, which introduces the risk of common method bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis result confirms that purchase intention in influencer marketing is not solely driven by cognitive evaluations of credibility, but also by affective and relational mechanisms operating independently.
“This result confirms that purchase intention in influencer marketing is not solely driven by cognitive evaluations of credibility, but also by affective and relational mechanisms operating independently”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for the IC-TR HTMT ratio [0.878; 0.988] does not include unity, suggesting that the constructs remain empirically distinct.
“Although the bootstrapped 95% confidence interval [0.878; 0.988] does not include unity, suggesting that the constructs remain empirically distinct”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhen consumers feel emotionally connected to an influencer, they tend to attribute benevolent intentions to that influencer and are less likely to perceive their recommendations as purely commercial, thereby reinforcing their willingness to rely on influencer recommendations.
“When consumers feel emotionally connected to an influencer, they tend to attribute benevolent intentions to that influencer and are less likely to perceive their recommendations as purely commercial, thereby reinforcing their willingness to rely on influencer recommendations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe results confirm that credibility encompassing expertise, perceived honesty, and attractiveness is positively associated with purchase intention both directly and indirectly through relational mechanisms.
“The results confirm that credibility encompassing expertise, perceived honesty, and attractiveness is positively associated with purchase intention both directly and indirectly through relational mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe convenience sampling approach and the inclusion of respondents reporting infrequent social media use limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader Moroccan population and to highly active influencer followers specifically.
“Third, the convenience sampling approach and the inclusion of respondents reporting infrequent social media use limit the generalizability of findings to the broader Moroccan population and to highly active influencer followers specifically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningInfluencers who communicate in Moroccan Arabic (Darija) or French, reference local cultural norms and events, and engage with Moroccan consumer concerns are likely to be more effective at generating positive purchase intentions by fostering the parasocial bonds and trust that are particularly salient in this collectivist cultural environment.
“Influencers who communicate in Moroccan Arabic (Darija) or French, reference local cultural norms and events, and engage with Moroccan consumer concerns are likely to be more effective at generating positive purchase intentions by fostering the parasocial bonds and trust that are particularly salient in this collectivist cultural environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Morocco has a collectivist cultural orientation.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis cultural dynamic may amplify the role of parasocial relationships as a mediating mechanism, as credible influencers who successfully cultivate parasocial bonds may be perceived as trusted community members whose recommendations carry social endorsement value beyond their informational content.
“This cultural dynamic may amplify the role of parasocial relationships as a mediating mechanism, as credible influencers who successfully cultivate parasocial bonds may be perceived as trusted community members whose recommendations carry social endorsement value beyond their informational content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningIn a market where interpersonal trust and relational closeness play a central role in purchase decision-making, culturally embedded influencers may offer a distinct advantage over globally recognized but culturally distant personalities.
“In a market where interpersonal trust and relational closeness play a central role in purchase decisionmaking, culturally embedded influencers may offer a distinct advantage over globally recognized but culturally distant personalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In Morocco, interpersonal trust and relational closeness play a central role in purchase decision-making.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown dataThe mediation analysis provides the most theoretically significant findings of this study.
“The mediation analysis provides the most theoretically significant findings of this study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis finding enriches the existing literature by identifying parasocial relationships as a relational antecedent of trust and positions emotional attachment as a bridge between cognitive credibility evaluations and dispositional trust formation.
“This finding enriches the existing literature by identifying parasocial relationships as a relational antecedent of trust; a pathway that had been undertheorized in prior work; and positions emotional attachment as a bridge between cognitive credibility evaluations and dispositional trust formation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe direct association between credibility and purchase intention, while significant (β = 0.183), is relatively modest compared to the total indirect effect (β = 0.347).
“The direct association between credibility and purchase intention, while significant (β = 0.183), is relatively modest compared to the total indirect effect (β = 0.347”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe strong association between influencer credibility and trust (β = 0.700) should be interpreted cautiously.
“The strong association between influencer credibility and trust (β = 0.700) should therefore be interpreted cautiously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThis dual-process interpretation adds nuance to the understanding of influencer persuasion mechanisms and represents a novel theoretical contribution to the sequential mediation literature in the influencer marketing domain.
“This dual-process interpretation adds nuance to the understanding of influencer persuasion mechanisms and represents a novel theoretical contribution to the sequential mediation literature in the influencer marketing domain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataParasocial relationships demonstrate independent predictive value, being positively associated with both purchase intention (β = 0.247) and trust (β = 0.161).
“Beyond credibility, parasocial relationships demonstrate independent predictive value, being positively associated with both purchase intention (β = 0.247) and trust (β = 0.161).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationTrust transfer theory (Stewart, 2003) posits that trust can migrate from a trusted person to a less familiar commercial context.
“This interpretation is consistent with trust transfer theory (Stewart, 2003), which posits that trust can migrate from a trusted person to a less familiar commercial context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stewart, 2003 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataParasocial relationships mediate the credibility-purchase intention relationship [β = 0.129; CI (0.065; 0.193)], and trust mediates the same relationship [β = 0.195; CI (0.076; 0.316)].
“Parasocial relationships mediate the credibility-purchase intention relationship [β = 0.129; CI (0.065; 0.193)], and trust mediates the same relationship [β = 0.195; CI (0.076; 0.316)].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe sequential mediation pathway IC → PSR → TR → PI is significant [β = 0.023; CI (0.003; 0.046)], confirming that the pathway from credibility to purchase intention follows a logical multi-stage progression: credibility evaluations first foster emotional bonds, which then reinforce relational trust, which ultimately predicts behavioral intentions.
“Most importantly, the sequential mediation pathway IC → PSR → TR → PI is significant [β = 0.023; CI (0.003; 0.046)], confirming that the pathway from credibility to purchase intention follows a logical multi-stage progression: credibility evaluations first foster emotional bonds, which then reinforce relational trust, which ultimately predicts behavioral intentions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study focused on influencer marketing as a general phenomenon without distinguishing between influencer types, platform characteristics, or product categories.
“Sixth, the study focused on influencer marketing as a general phenomenon without distinguishing between influencer types, platform characteristics, or product categories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis study provides empirical support for a relational pathway in which emotional proximity enhances trust formation beyond what credibility alone can explain, positioning parasocial relationships as a bridge between cognitive source evaluations and dispositional trust.
“This study provides empirical support for a relational pathway in which emotional proximity enhances trust formation beyond what credibility alone can explain, positioning parasocial relationships as a bridge between cognitive source evaluations and dispositional trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis pattern suggests that credibility signals alone may be insufficient to predict behavioral intentions, and that their effectiveness is predominantly channeled through relational and psychological mechanisms.
“This pattern suggests that credibility signals alone may be insufficient to predict behavioral intentions, and that their effectiveness is predominantly channeled through relational and psychological mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSource credibility theory (Hovland and Weiss, 1951) posits that the persuasive power of a source depends not only on its perceived attributes but also on the relational context in which communication occurs.
“This finding is consistent with source credibility theory (Hovland and Weiss, 1951), which posits that the persuasive power of a source depends not only on its perceived attributes but also on the relational context in which communication occurs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hovland and Weiss, 1951 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataTrust is positively associated with purchase intention (β = 0.278), confirming its role as a key mechanism reducing perceived risk in online consumer decision-making.
“Trust, in turn, is positively associated with purchase intention (β = 0.278), confirming its role as a key mechanism reducing perceived risk in online consumer decision-making”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li et al., 2025
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yasin et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
The paper relies on this without support.
The underlying relational mechanisms through which influencer credibility translates into purchase intention remain insufficiently explored.
“While prior research has emphasized trust as a key driver of consumer responses, the underlying relational mechanisms through which influencer credibility translates into purchase intention remain insufficiently explored.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Morocco's cultural orientation is moderately collectivist, making interpersonal trust and relational cues particularly important in consumer decision-making.
“In this context, interpersonal trust and relational cues may play a particularly important role in consumer decision-making, consistent with Morocco's moderately collectivist cultural orientation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No comprehensive sampling frame for the target population was available.
“A nonprobability convenience sampling technique was employed, as no comprehensive sampling frame for this population was available, a procedure commonly adopted in digital marketing research (Hair et al., 2019).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Purchase intention is a strong proximal predictor of actual purchasing behavior.
“purchase intention is widely recognized in the consumer behavior literature as a strong proximal predictor of actual purchasing behavior”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of Moroccan social media users is representative of the broader population of Moroccan social media users or consumers.
“This study examined the associations among influencer credibility, parasocial relationships, trust, and purchase intention among Moroccan social media users.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Respondents accurately reported their social media usage frequency and their following of at least one influencer.
“These participants were retained because they confirmed following at least one influencer and being exposed to influencer-generated content”
The paper relies on this without support.
Morocco has a collectivist cultural orientation.
“The collectivist cultural orientation prevalent in Morocco may amplify the role of parasocial relationships and interpersonal trust in the influence process in ways that do not generalize to individualist cultural contexts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In Morocco, interpersonal trust and relational closeness play a central role in purchase decision-making.
“In a market where interpersonal trust and relational closeness play a central role in purchase decisionmaking, culturally embedded influencers may offer a distinct advantage over globally recognized but culturally distant personalities.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Managerial conclusion attributes the full effect to sequential mediation
MinorThe managerial section says the full impact of credibility is realized through the sequential pathway. The results instead report a significant direct effect and separate indirect pathways, so the sequential pathway accounts for only part of that impact.
“the full impact of influencer credibility on purchase intentions is realized through the sequential development of parasocial bonds and trust.”
“Since the direct effect of IC on PI remains significant after introducing the mediators (β = 0.183; p = .027),the model exhibits partial mediation: influencer credibility predicts purchase intention both directly and indirectly through parasocial relationships and trust.”
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019) · European Business Review · doi:10.1108/ebr-11-2018-0203 · Cited by 27,541 · see citing works
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287 · see citing works
Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/651257 · Cited by 12,583 · see citing works
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215 · see citing works
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635 · see citing works
Using pls path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382 · Cited by 7,173 · see citing works
Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379102800305 · Cited by 5,853 · see citing works
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043 · see citing works
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543 · see citing works
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 · Cited by 2,795 · see citing works
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 · Cited by 1,650 · see citing works
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2022) · Handbook of Market Research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15 · Cited by 1,483 · see citing works
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12647 · Cited by 1,364 · see citing works
Cross-Sectional versus longitudinal survey research: concepts, findings, and guidelines
Rindfleisch, A., Malter, A. J., Ganesan, S., & Moorman, C. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.3.261 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Trust Transfer on the World Wide Web
Stewart, K. J. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.1.5.12810 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Reinikainen, H., Munnukka, J., Maity, D., & Luoma-aho, V. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2019.1708781 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Hwang, K., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.029 · Cited by 639 · see citing works
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Horton and Wohl revisited: exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Cross-cultural consumer behavior: a review of research findings
de Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2011) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2011.578057 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing
Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Selling brands while staying “Authentic”: The professionalization of Instagram influencers
van Driel, L., & Dumitrica, D. (2020) · Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856520902136 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Bi, N. C., & Zhang, R. (2023) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-08-2021-0214 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Social media influencers and consumer engagement: A review and future research agenda
Pradhan, B., Kishore, K., & Gokhale, N. P. (2023) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12901 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Breves, P. L., & Liebers, N. (2022) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2022.2109708 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
When marketing strategy meets culture: the role of culture in product evaluations
Song, R., Sangkil Moon, A., Chen, H. A., & Houston, M. B. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0525-x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Koay, K. Y., Cheah, C. W., & Yap, J. Y. (2024) · Journal of Relationship Marketing · doi:10.1080/15332667.2023.2216373 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The impact of Influencers’ credibility towards purchase intention
Martiningsih, D. A., & Setyawan, A. A. (2022) · Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research · doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.220602.025 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Yasin, M., Porcu, L., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11174649 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Li, W., Cujilema, S., Hu, L., & Gang, X. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20020085 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Influencer Marketing: A Review and Research Agenda Using VOSviewer
Kumar, R., Prabha, V., Kumar, M., Rehal, P., Samanta, P., & Singh, P. K. (2024) · Abhigyan · doi:10.1177/09702385241289368 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Influencer credibility, parasocial relationships, and product involvement in purchase intentions
Tripopsakul, S., & Hoonsopon, D. (2025) · Emerging Science Journal · doi:10.28991/esj-2025-09-04-021 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Damaj, A., & Nofal, R. (2026) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer21040112 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sun, W., Song, L., Mangi, T. A., & Khoso, W. M. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-02-2025-0251 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Nguyen, C., Nguyen, T. N., & Luu, V. (2022) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-98689-6_31 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Huang, Y.-T., & Gong, A.-D. (2024) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19030082 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness of social media in financial decision-making: differences and similarities
Khan, K. A., Akhtar, M. A., & Tripathi, P. K. (2020) · Innovative Marketing · doi:10.21511/im.16(4).2020.13 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gong, W., Ye, W., & Yu, S. (2024) · Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19040156 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Azzouzi, M., & Naoui, F. (2025) · African Scientific Journal · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17193038 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Laghari, A. H., han, P., Khoso, W. M., & Memon, S. (2026) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2026.104885 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
AZZOUZI, M., & NAOUI, F. (2025) · African Scientific Journal · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17193039 · Cited by 2
Denpasar, U. M., Julianti, N., Tahu, G. P., Denpasar, U. M., Mitariani, N. W. E., & Denpasar, U. M. (2025) · Journal of Economics Finance and Management Studies · doi:10.47191/jefms/v8-i7-36 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
GHANDOUR, A., & OUAZZANI TOUHAMI, Z. (2023) · Revue des Etudes Multidisciplinaires en Sciences Economiques et Sociales · doi:10.48375/imist.prsm/remses-v8i2.36396 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
BOUADDI, M., Cohen, S., MOUFAKKIR, H., & Beddaa, M. (2025) · International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15291617 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Influenceur web et intention d'achat: Rôle de l'environnement culturel du follower
GUELEU DOMGUIA, J. S., & NGOK EVINA, J. F. (2025) · REVUE AFRICAINE DE MANAGEMENT · doi:10.48424/imist.prsm/ram-v1i12.58966 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kostygina, G., Kim, Y., Borowiecki, M., Carter, C. C., Liu, M., Kresovich, A., Kreslake, J. M., Hair, E. C., & Emery, S. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119316 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Slimani, H., & Tissafi, A. E. I. (2023) · Sciendo eBooks · doi:10.2478/9788367405225-030 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
BOUADDI, M., COHEN, S., MOUFAKKIR, H., & BEDDAA, M. (2025) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15291618
Sharkasi, N., & Rezakhah, S. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.00005
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Ringle, 2022, SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS
- Tukachinsky, 2010, Para-Romantic love and para-friendships: development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Nassim, S., Soulami, M., Hasinat, I., Nassim, I., & Touate, S.
- Affiliations
- Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University (MA)
- Corresponding author
- Nassim, Salma
- Soulami, Malika
- Venue
- Frontiers in Communication
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2026-09-08
- Volume
- 11
- ISSN
- 2297-900X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7211942541
- Semantic Scholar
- 9a49b2f46c97d7bada8f0652c6032dea3eb231c9
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- influencer marketing, purchase intention, parasocial relationships, consumer trust, influencer credibility, source credibility theory, serial mediation, Moroccan consumers, emerging markets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-05.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-05.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review