Cited by 204Technology Use by Older AdultsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourAging and Gerontology Research

Useful, Social and Enjoyable: Mobile Phone Adoption by Older People

Open access
Conci, Mario, Pianesi, Fabio, Zancanaro, Massimo·2009·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trust has been demonstrated as an important factor in the contexts of e-commerce, e-government and technology adoption.

    “Trust has been demonstrated as an important factor in the contexts of e-commerce, e-government and technology adoption [48,108].”

    From The Investigation of Adoption of Voice-User Interface (VUI) in Smart Home Systems among Chinese Older Adults (2022) · cites this paper as [108]

    Section 3 discusses e-government and technology acceptance, but identifies perceived usefulness and ease of use—not trust—as factors. Section 3.4 examines perceived safety in mobile-phone use. Searches for trust, e-commerce, and related terms found no passage establishing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lin, C.A.: Looking back: the contribution of Blumer and Katz's uses of mass communication research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 40, (1996), 574- 582.
  2. Sharp, J.H.: Development, extension and application: a review of the technology acceptance model. In Proc. ISECON 2006, (2006).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conci, M., Pianesi, F., & Zancanaro, M.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2009
Pages
63-76
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2101250073
Cited by
204
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
16.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
mobile phone adoption, older adults, technology acceptance, technology acceptance model, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, utilitarian motivation, social influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review