CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safe Spaces Online: Usability Testing of a Virtual Space to Foster Digital Resilience Among LGBTQI+ Youth

Samoh, Nattharat, Choemprayong, Songphan, Khlaisang, Jintavee, Guadamuz, Thomas E.·2026·Lecture Notes in Computer Science
DOI 10.1007/978-981-95-4861-3_30
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-95-4861-3_30

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Samoh et al. (2025), participants valued emotional safety and control and asked for simpler navigation and facilitated peer groups.

    “Participants valued its emotional safety and the control it gave them and asked for simpler navigation and facilitated peer groups.”

    From Artificial intelligence and immersive technologies for LGBTQ+ youth: a narrative review (2026) · cites this paper as Samoh et al., 2025

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Kowalski, R.M., Giumetti, G.W., Schroeder, A.N., Lattanner, M.R.: Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1073–1137 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035618 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Festl, R., Quandt, T.: Social relations and cyberbullying: the influence of individual and structural attributes on victimization and perpetration via the internet. Hum. Commun. Res. 39, 101–126 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01442.x · DOI
  3. Evangelio, C., Rodríguez-González, P., Fernández-Río, J., Gonzalez-Villora, S.: Cyberbullying in elementary and middle school students: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 176, 104356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356 · DOI
  4. Samoh, N., Boonmongkon, P., Ojanen, T.T., Samakkeekarom, R., Jonas, K.J., Guadamuz, T.E.: It’s an ordinary matter: perceptions of cyberbullying in Thai youth culture. J. Youth Stud. 22, 240–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1495835 · DOI
  5. Chudal, R., et al.: Victimization by traditional bullying and cyberbullying and the combination of these among adolescents in 13 European and Asian countries. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 31, 1391–1404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01779-6 · DOI
  6. Saruddin, M.Z., Azman, A.Z.F., Zulkefli, N.A.M., Rodi, M., Isa: prevalence of cyberbullying and its associated factors among high school students in Klang District Malaysia. Malays. J. Med. Health Sci. 21, 220–231 (2025). https://doi.org/10.47836/mjmhs.21.3.26 · DOI
  7. Sterzing, P.R., Ratliff, G.A., Gartner, R.E., McGeough, B.L., Johnson, K.C.: Social ecological correlates of polyvictimization among a national sample of transgender, genderqueer, and cisgender sexual minority adolescents. Child Abuse Negl. 67, 1–12 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.017 · DOI
  8. Hinduja, S., Patchin, J.W.: Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch. Suicide Res. 14, 206–221 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Arató, N., Zsidó, A.N., Lénárd, K., Lábadi, B.: Cybervictimization and cyberbullying: the role of socio-emotional skills. Front. Psychiatry 11 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00248 · DOI
  10. Vissenberg, J., d’Haenens, L., Livingstone, S.: Digital literacy and online resilience as facilitators of young people’s well-being?: a systematic review. Eur. Psychol. 27, 76–85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000478 · DOI
  11. Brodsky, A.E., Cattaneo, L.B.: A transconceptual model of empowerment and resilience: divergence, convergence and interactions in kindred community concepts. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 52, 333–346 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9599-x · DOI
  12. Berry, S., Linder, K.E.: Creating Inclusive Online Communities: Practices that Support and Engage Diverse Students. Routledge, New York (2023). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443780 · DOI
  13. Englander, E., Donnerstein, E., Kowalski, R., Lin, C.A., Parti, K.: Defining cyberbullying. Pediatrics 140, S148–S151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758U · DOI · Paper page
  14. Palladino, B.E., Nocentini, A., Menesini, E.: Evidence-based intervention against bullying and cyberbullying: evaluation of the NoTrap! Program in two independent trials: evaluation of the NoTrap! Program. Aggress. Behav. 42, 194–206 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21636 · DOI
  15. Qamaria, R.S., Kuswandi, D., Setiyowati, N., Bahodirovna, A.M.: Digital resilience in adolescence: a systematic review of models, methods and theoretical perspectives. Multidiscip. Rev. 8, 2025287 (2025). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025287 · DOI
  16. Ashktorab, Z., Vitak, J.: Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3895–3905. ACM, San Jose (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548 · DOI
  17. Day, J.K., Fish, J.N., Grossman, A.H., Russell, S.T.: Gay-straight alliances, inclusive policy, and school climate: LGBTQ youths’ experiences of social support and bullying. J. Res. Adolesc. 30, 418–430 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12487 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Saim, M., Rizvi, R.M.: Digital resilience: a review of cutting-edge approaches to cyberbullying detection in the social media landscape. In: 2023 1st DMIHER International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education and Industry 4.0 (IDICAIEI), pp. 1–6. IEEE, Wardha (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/IDICAIEI58380.2023.10406622 · DOI
  19. Petrič, G., Petrovčič, A.: Individual and collective empowerment in online communities: the mediating role of communicative interaction in web forums. Inf. Soc. 30, 184–199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.896683 · DOI
  20. Sharma, S., Khadka, A.: Role of empowerment and sense of community on online social health support group. Inf. Technol. People 32, 1564–1590 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-09-2018-0410 · DOI
  21. Nixon, C.: Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolesc. Health Med. Ther. 143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2147/AHMT.S36456 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wienrich, C., Horn, V., Krauss, J., Bürger, A.: Personal space invasion to prevent cyberbullying: design, development, and evaluation of an immersive prevention measure for children and adolescents. Virtual Real. 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-024-00964-7 · DOI
  23. Snakenborg, J., Van Acker, R., Gable, R.A.: Cyberbullying: prevention and intervention to protect our children and youth. Prev. Sch. Fail. Altern. Educ. Child. Youth 55, 88–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2011.539454 · DOI
  24. Freed, D., Bazarova, N., Consolvo, S., Cosley, D., Gage Kelley, P.: PROTECT: a framework to foster digital resilience for youth navigating technology-facilitated abuse. Soc. Sci. 14, 378 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060378 · DOI
  25. Subramaniam, M., Valdivia, C., Pellicone, A., Neigh, Z.: Teach me and trust me: creating an empowered online community of tweens and parents. In: iConference 2014 Proceedings. iSchools (2014). https://doi.org/10.9776/14078 · DOI
  26. Craig, S.L., Eaton, A.D., McInroy, L.B., Leung, V.W.Y., Krishnan, S.: Can social media participation enhance LGBTQ+ youth well-being? Development of the social media benefits scale. Soc. Media Soc. 7, 2056305121988931 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305121988931 · DOI
  27. Sánchez-Romero, C., Muñoz-Jiménez, E.M.: Immersive environments at school: “stop cyberbullying by proximity. In: Arai, K. (ed.) Intelligent Computing, pp. 377–383. Springer, Cham (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62277-9_24 · DOI
  28. Read, J.C., Horton, M., Fitton, D., Sim, G.: Empowered and informed: participation of children in HCI. In: Bernhaupt, R., Dalvi, G., Joshi, A., Balkrishan, D.K., O’Neill, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2017, pp. 431–446. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_27 · DOI
  29. Picard, R. W.: Affective Computing. MIT Press (2000)
  30. Eggleston, M., et al.: A scoping review of trauma-informed care principles applied in design and technology. Digit. Health. 11, 20552076251360924 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251360925 · DOI
  31. Chen, J.X., et al.: Trauma-informed computing: towards safer technology experiences for all. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–20. ACM, New Orleans (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517475 · DOI
  32. O’Brien, H.L., Roll, I., Kampen, A., Davoudi, N.: Rethinking (dis)engagement in human-computer interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 128, 107109 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Ren, X., Silpasuwanchai, C., Cahill, J.: Human-engaged computing: the future of human-computer interaction. CCF Trans. Pervasive Comput. Interact. 1, 47–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-019-00007-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Samoh, N., Choemprayong, S., Khlaisang, J., & Guadamuz, T. E.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published
2025-12-02
Pages
357-373
ISSN
  • 0302-9743
  • 1611-3349
DOI
10.1007/978-981-95-4861-3_30
Cited by
3
References
7
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review