Cited by 60Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions in Reducing Bullying and Cyberbullying: A Meta-Analysis

Chen, Qiqi, Chan, Ko Ling, Guo, Shaolingyun, Chen, Mengtong, Lo, Camilla Kin-ming, Ip, Patrick·2023·Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Abstract

Bullying and cyberbullying bring adverse physical and psychological impacts on individuals and an economic burden for society. Scholars have developed anti-bullying intervention programs to combat these problems. This meta-analysis aims to examine and compare the effectiveness of digital health interventions (DHIs) in reducing bullying and cyberbullying. A comprehensive search was conducted using databases (PsycINFO, Social Service Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, MEDLINE, ERIC, and EMBASE). Quasi-experimental and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before 31 January 2021 that reported the effects of DHIs in reducing bullying or cyberbullying were included. The 16 studies included in the synthesis reported overall random effect sizes (Cohen’s d ) for bullying and cyberbullying reduction were 0.41 and 0.19, respectively. The results provide evidence on the effectiveness of DHIs, comparable to that of face-to-face interventions. The subgroup analysis revealed that the critical components of effective DHIs include training on bystander and bully–victim dual roles, coping skills, and interactive serious games. It highlights the promising effects of digital health approaches in bullying and cyberbullying interventions. Our review identifies avenues for future research on the development of more effective DHIs to reduce bullying and cyberbullying.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/15248380221082090

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Q., Chan, K. L., Guo, S., Chen, M., Lo, C. K.-M., & Ip, P.
Affiliations
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Chan, Ko Ling
Venue
Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Published
2022-04-21
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
1986-2002
ISSN
  • 1524-8380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8324
OpenAlex
W4224220714
Cited by
60
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trauma Violence & Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (PolyU 15606520)
  • Projects of Strategic Importance of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (1-ZE1R)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
bullying, cyberbullying, digital health interventions, bullying intervention, bystander training, coping strategies, serious games, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Crime Victims, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review