Cited by 332Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEmotions and Moral Behavior

The Relationship Between Uncertainty and Affect

Open access
Anderson, Eric C., Carleton, R. Nicholas, Diefenbach, Michael, Han, Paul K. J.·2019·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Uncertainty and affect are fundamental and interrelated aspects of the human condition. Uncertainty is often associated with negative affect, but in some circumstances, it is associated with positive affect. In this article, we review different explanations for the varying relationship between uncertainty and affect. We identify "mental simulation" as a key process that links uncertainty to affective states. We suggest that people have a propensity to simulate negative outcomes, which result in a propensity toward negative affective responses to uncertainty. We also propose the existence of several important moderators of this process, including context and individual differences such as uncertainty tolerance, as well as emotion regulation strategies. Finally, we highlight important knowledge gaps and promising areas for future research, both empirical and conceptual, to further elucidate the relationship between uncertainty and affect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02504

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mental simulation of future events may be the mechanistic link between uncertainty (as a breeding ground of anxiety) and affective responses.

    “Mental simulation of future events may be the mechanistic link between uncertainty (as a breeding ground of anxiety) and affective responses [136].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Duttle K. Inukai K. (2015). Complexity aversion: influences of cognitive abilities, culture and system of thought. Econ. Bull. 35, 846– 855. 10.13140/RG.2.1.1604.8486 · DOI
  2. Gray J. A. (1976). “ The behavioural inhibition system: a possible substrate for anxiety” in Theoretical and experimental bases of behaviour modification. eds. Feldman M. P. Broadhurst A. M. (London: Wiley), 3– 41.
  3. Gray J. A. McNaughton N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. 2nd Edn. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, E. C., Carleton, R. N., Diefenbach, M., & Han, P. K. J.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
Anderson, Eric C.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
10
Pages
2504-2504
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984193447
Cited by
332
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 19
FWCI
19.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • oURspace (University of Regina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
uncertainty, affect, mental simulation, negative affect, positive affect, uncertainty tolerance, emotion regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review