The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Behavior: The Control of Perception
Kuhn, A., & Powers, W. T. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2063243 · Cited by 2,398
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 2×
“By the time a comprehensive review of feedback studies was completed in 1977 (Kulhavy, 1977), research on the effects of feedback in instruction was concerned primarily with applying information-processing models to the feedback paradigm.”
BackgroundSelf-citationFeedback in Computer Assisted Instruction
Roper, W. J. (1977) · Programmed Learning and Educational Technology · doi:10.1080/1355800770140107 · Cited by 71
Cited by
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
“Kulhavy and Stock (1989) noted that if confidence or response certainty is high and the response turns out to be a correct one, little attention is paid to the feedback.”
BackgroundShute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
First principles of instruction
Merrill, M. D. (2002) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02505024 · Cited by 2,092
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002213 · Cited by 1,313
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314564881 · Cited by 714
The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602
Test format and corrective feedback modify the effect of testing on long-term retention
Kang, S. H. K., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440601056620 · Cited by 513
Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.3.604 · Cited by 457
A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416 · Cited by 389
A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · Cited by 368
A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6 · Cited by 299
Transfer of test- enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000151 · Cited by 286
The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1 · Cited by 184
Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221077901 · Cited by 186
Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback
Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.604951 · Cited by 181
(2008) · International journal on e-learning · Cited by 148
Van der Kleij, F. M., Vermeulen, J. A., Schildkamp, K., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.999024 · Cited by 135
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019 · Cited by 122
RESPONSE TO ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: THE EFFECTS OF GRADES, PRAISE, AND SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02116.x · Cited by 109
Cranney, J., Ahn, M., McKinnon, R., Morris, S., & Watts, K. (2009) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440802413505 · Cited by 80
Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A., & Harks, B. (2008) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.111 · Cited by 76
Lui, A. M., & Andrade, H. L. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.751548 · Cited by 71
Supporting learning from text: A meta-analysis on the timing and content of effective feedback
Swart, E. K., Nielen, T. M. J., & Sikkema - de Jong, M. T. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100296 · Cited by 68
Math Education with Large Language Models: Peril or Promise?
Kumar, H., Rothschild, D. M., Goldstein, D. G., & Hofman, J. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4641653 · Cited by 54
The Effect of Feedback on Face‐Matching Accuracy
Alenezi, H. M., & Bindemann, M. (2013) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2968 · Cited by 54
Math Education With Large Language Models: Peril or Promise?
Kumar, H., Rothschild, D. M., Goldstein, D. G., & Hofman, J. M. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98459-4_5 · Cited by 54
Yu, F.-Y., & Wu, W.-S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103723 · Cited by 51
Perikos, I., Grivokostopoulou, F., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-017-0139-y · Cited by 44
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D. (2019) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019885136 · Cited by 42
Using Peer Feedback to Improve Students’ Scientific Inquiry
Tasker, T. Q., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2016) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9454-7 · Cited by 29
Daumiller, M., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102390 · Cited by 23
Lipsch-Wijnen, I., & Dirkx, K. (2022) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2022.2082089 · Cited by 22
Let Me Teach You: Pedagogical Foundations of Feedback for Language Models
Borges, B., Tandon, N., Käser, T., & Bosselut, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.00279
Metadata
- Authors
- Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 279-308
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W2084314409
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 47.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
