Cited by 299Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessStudent Assessment and Feedback

A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation

Fong, Carlton J., Patall, Erika A., Vasquez, Ariana C., Stautberg, Sandra·2019·Educational Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has shown how to provide negative feedback without lowering motivation, how peer comparison can be harnessed for motivation, and how feedback can be given without revealing errors.

    “Research has shown how to provide negative feedback in a way that does not lower a learner's motivation (Fong et al., 2019), how peer comparison can be harnessed for motivation (Mumm & Mutlu, 2011), or how feedback can be given without giving away that errors have been made (Narciss & Huth, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S.
Affiliations
  • Texas State University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Fong, Carlton J.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2018-08-15
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
121-162
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2886610728
Cited by
299
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 116 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Psychological Association
  • American Educational Research Association
  • Association for Psychological Science
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
negative feedback, intrinsic motivation, positive feedback, feedback effects, instructional feedback, children, adults, demotivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review