Cited by 74Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Experimental analysis of childhood psychopathology: A laboratory matching analysis of the behavior of children diagnosed with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Kollins, Scott H., Lane, Scott D., Shapiro, Steven K.·1997·The Psychological Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03395211

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kollins, S. H., Lane, S. D., & Shapiro, S. K.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Venue
The Psychological Record
Published
1997-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
25-44
ISSN
  • 0033-2933 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-3452
OpenAlex
W164735932
Cited by
74
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Psychological Record (publishedVersion)
  • OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood psychopathology, response ratio, time allocation, child behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review