Cited by 728Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Evaluating Dopamine Reward Pathway in ADHD: Clinical Implications

Open access
Volkow, Nora D., Wang, Gene-Jack, Kollins, Scott H., Wigal, Tim L., Newcorn, Jeffrey H., Telang, Frank, Fowler, Joanna S., Zhu, Wei +5 more·2009·JAMA

Abstract

We used positron emission tomography to measure dopamine synaptic markers (transporters and D2/D3 receptors) in 53 nonmedicated adults with ADHD and 44 healthy controls. For both ligands, statistical parametric mapping showed that specific binding was lower in ADHD than in controls in regions of the dopamine reward pathway in the left side of the brain. The mean for DAT in the nucleus accumbens for controls was 0.71 vs 0.63 for those with ADHD and in the midbrain for controls was 0.16 vs 0.09 for those with ADHD. For D2/D3 receptors, the mean in the caudate for controls was 2.80 vs 2.67 for those with ADHD; and in the accumbens for controls was 2.85 vs 2.68 for those with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.1308

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Mean D2/D3 receptor availability in nucleus accumbens was lower in ADHD (2.68) than controls (2.85), 95% CI 0.06-0.30, P=.004.

    “for D2/D3 receptors, the mean accumbens for controls was 2.85 vs 2.68 for those with ADHD (95% CI, 0.06–0.30, P=.004)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Mean D2/D3 receptor availability in hypothalamic region was lower in ADHD (0.05) than controls (0.12), 95% CI 0.02-0.12, P=.004.

    “differences in D2/D3 in the hypothalamic region, with controls having a mean of 0.12 vs 0.05 for those with ADHD (95% CI, 0.02–0.12; P=.004)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    DAT reductions in left hypothalamic region were not significantly different between groups.

    “but the reductions in left hypothalamic region were not significantly different (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Mean DAT availability in midbrain was lower in ADHD (0.09) than controls (0.16), 95% CI 0.03-0.12, P≤.001.

    “and in the midbrain for controls was 0.16 vs 0.09 for those with ADHD (95% CI, 0.03–0.12; P ≤ .001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Mean D2/D3 receptor availability in midbrain was lower in ADHD (0.18) than controls (0.28), 95% CI 0.02-0.17, P=.01.

    “and in the midbrain, it was for controls 0.28 vs 0.18 for those with ADHD (95% CI, 0.02–0.17, P=.01)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    No brain regions showed higher D2/D3 or DAT availability in ADHD participants than in controls.

    “There were no regions that were higher in ADHD participants than in controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    Attention ratings were negatively correlated with DAT availability in left midbrain.

    “and with DAT in the midbrain (r=0.37; 95% CI, 0.16–0.53; P ≤ .001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Lower than normal D2/D3 receptors and DAT availability in caudate was demonstrated in ADHD.

    “Lower than normal D2/D3 receptors and DAT availability in ADHD in the caudate was also demonstrated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Genetic and environmental etiologies implicating dopamine have been proposed for ADHD.

    “Genetic and environmental etiologies that implicate the neurotransmitter dopamine have been proposed for ADHD.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The SWAN rating scale has psychometric properties superior to truncated symptom-severity rating scales.

    “The psychometric properties of the SWAN rating scale are superior to those of truncated symptom-severity ratings scales.22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The finding of hypothalamic involvement is preliminary and in need of replication.

    “Thus, this finding is preliminary and in need of replication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The lack of significant correlations with reflectivity/impulsivity could reflect low scores and thus lack of sensitivity.

    “which could reflect that the scores were low and thus the sensitivity to observe such a correlation was lacking.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationown data

    The preliminary finding of lower D2/D3 receptor availability in hypothalamic region could provide a neurobiological basis for the high comorbidity of ADHD with signs and symptoms suggestive of hypothalamic pathology.

    “The preliminary finding reported herein of lower than normal dopamine D2/D3 receptor availability in the hypothalamic region of ADHD participants is intriguing because if replicated, it could hypothetically provide a neurobiological basis for the high co-morbidity of ADHD with signs and symptoms suggestive of hypothalamic pathology45 such as sleep disturbances,46 overweight or obesity,47 and abnor”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The laterality effects should be interpreted as preliminary and in need of replication.

    “the laterality effects should be interpreted as preliminary and in need of replication.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study was not initially designed to evaluate hypothalamic dopamine involvement in ADHD.

    “This study was not initially designed to evaluate hypothalamic dopamine involvement in ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence from brain imaging studies have shown that brain dopamine neurotransmission is disrupted in ADHD and that these deficits may underlie core symptoms of inattention and impulsivity.

    “Evidence from brain imaging studies have shown that brain dopamine neurotransmission is disrupted in ADHD5–9 and that these deficits may underlie core symptoms of inattention8 and impulsivity.9”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [5]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [6]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [7]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [8]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Morphological MRI images were not obtained, so volumetric differences in striatum could not be ascertained.

    “Morphological MRI images were not obtained and thus whether volumetric differences in striatum in those with ADHD that could account for these findings could not be ascertained since volumetric differences in striatum have been reported in ADHD.36–40”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [36]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [37]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [38]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [39]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [40]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The D2/D3 receptor measures in accumbens correlated with attention, implicating the dopamine reward pathway in symptoms of inattention in ADHD.

    “In our study, the D2/D3 receptor measures in accumbens were correlated with the dimension of attention, which would implicate the dopamine reward pathway in the symptoms of inattention in ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway plays a key role in reinforcement-motivation and in learning stimuli-reward associations.

    “This pathway plays a key role in reinforcement-motivation and in learning stimuli-reward associations,51 and its involvement in ADHD supports the use of interventions to enhance the saliency of school and work tasks to improve performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [51]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scale has well-established factor structure, reliability, and validity.

    “This rating system has been widely used in clinical and research settings and has well-established factor structure, reliability, and validity (Table 1).24”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The reward deficits in ADHD are characterized by a failure to delay gratification, impaired response to partial schedules of reinforcement, and preference for small immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards.

    “The reward deficits in ADHD are characterized by a failure to delay gratification, impaired response to partial schedules of reinforcement, and preference for small immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards.31”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Low number of dopamine D2/D3 receptors in the nucleus accumbens have been associated with a greater risk for drug abuse.

    “Finally, because a low number of dopamine D2/D3 receptors in the nucleus accumbens have been associated with a greater risk for drug abuse,33 future work should determine if the lower than normal D2/D3 receptor availability in the accumbens region in ADHD underlies the higher vulnerability for substance abuse in this population.34”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both motivational interventions and contingency management have been shown to improve performance in ADHD patients.

    “Both motivational interventions and contingency management have been shown to improve performance in ADHD patients.52”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [52]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Measures of reward sensitivity were not performed, so the inference that dopamine marker decreases underlie reward deficits is limited.

    “Another study limitation was that measures of reward sensitivity were not performed. Thus, we can only infer that the decreases in the dopamine markers in the accumbens region could underlie the reward deficits that have been reported in patients with ADHD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Multiple hypothalamic nuclei express dopamine D2 receptors.

    “Multiple hypothalamic nuclei express dopamine D2 receptors,49 but the limited spatial resolution of a PET scan does not allow for localizing where the differences between the groups occurred.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Low statistical power may have contributed to the lack of significant ADHD-normal differences in the right brain regions.

    “low statistical power may have contributed to the lack of significant ADHD-normal differences in the right brain regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The analysis used a significance threshold of P<.005 (cluster corrected >100 voxels) for SPM, corroborated by ROI at P<.05, and Bonferroni correction for correlations.

    “Definitions for significant difference for the outcome measures1 were that statistical parametric mapping comparisons for the DAT and the D2/D3 images had to be significant at P<.005 (cluster corrected > 100 voxels) and the regional findings had to be corroborated by independently drawn region of interests2; comparisons for these corroborative measures had to be significant at P<.053; correlations”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway is critically involved in reward and motivation and has been hypothesized to underlie the reward and motivational deficits observed in ADHD.

    “The mesoaccumbens dopamine pathway, which projects from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) in the midbrain to the nucleus accumbens is critically involved in reward and motivation14 and has been hypothesized to underlie the reward and motivational deficits observed in ADHD.11,15”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [15]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Alternatively, the lack of significant correlations could reflect involvement of frontal regions in impulsivity, which could not be measured with current PET radioligands.

    “Alternatively it could reflect the involvement of frontal regions in impulsivity,57 which could not be measured with current PET radioligands; D2/D3 receptors and DAT levels in frontal regions are very low.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • Rests on an assumption: D2/D3 receptors and DAT levels in frontal regions are very low.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    There is increased awareness that patients with ADHD may have reward and motivation deficits.

    “There is also increased awareness that patients with ADHD may have reward and motivation deficits.10–12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [11]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [12]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The limited spatial resolution of a PET scan does not allow localizing where the differences between groups occurred.

    “but the limited spatial resolution of a PET scan does not allow for localizing where the differences between the groups occurred.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
26 of 26
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study has directly measured synaptic dopamine markers in the accumbens region of individuals with ADHD.

    “However, to our knowledge no study has directly measured synaptic dopamine markers in the accumbens region of individuals with ADHD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    D2/D3 receptors and DAT levels in frontal regions are very low.

    “D2/D3 receptors and DAT levels in frontal regions are very low.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADHD participants had lower D2/D3 receptor and DAT availability in NAcc and midbrain compared to controls.

    “using positron emission tomography (PET) we showed lower than normal availability of DA D2/D3 receptors (measured with [ 11 C]raclopride) and of DA transporters (measured with [ 11 C]cocaine) in the midbrain and in NAcc in drug naïve ADHD participants compared to non-ADHD control subjects 10 .”
  • Substance-use disorders are typically accompanied by decreased reward motivation for typical and non-pathological rewards, termed motivational toxicity or reward-deficiency syndrome.

    “As a number of researchers have described [106,149], substance-use disorders are typically accompanied by decreased reward motivation for typical and non-pathological rewards, a phenomenon that has been variously termed ‘motivational toxicity’ [150] and ‘reward-deficiency syndrome’ [151].”
  • Immediate and marked response of ADHD symptoms to stimulant medications suggests main underlying pathophysiological process may involve deficits or imbalances in catecholaminergic, dopaminergic, and nicotinergic functioning.

    “The immediate and marked response of ADHD symptoms to stimulant medications such as amphetamines and methylphenidate, which increase levels of synaptic dopamine, suggests that the main underlying pathophysiological process may involve deficits or imbalances in catecholaminergic, dopaminergic, and nicotinergic functioning [109-111].”
  • Both addiction and ADHD have been strongly associated with dysfunction in ascending dopaminergic systems that relate to reward response.

    “It readily applies to ADHD because children with ADHD are at elevated risk of addiction, and both addiction and ADHD have been strongly associated with dysfunction in ascending dopaminergic systems that relate to reward response (Volkow et al., 2009, Volkow et al., 2011a, Volkow et al., 2011b).”
  • Children with ADHD are at elevated risk of addiction.

    “It readily applies to ADHD because children with ADHD are at elevated risk of addiction, and both addiction and ADHD have been strongly associated with dysfunction in ascending dopaminergic systems that relate to reward response (Volkow et al., 2009, Volkow et al., 2011a, Volkow et al., 2011b).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported correlation sign conflicts with the stated interpretation

    Major

    The results call the association with attention negative, but the reported coefficient is positive (r=0.35), as are the other reported attention correlations. Because the paper says higher SWAN scores indicate more symptoms, the reported sign reverses the stated interpretation that lower dopamine measures accompany greater inattention.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Kollins, S. H., Wigal, T. L., Newcorn, J. H., Telang, F., Fowler, J. S., Zhu, W., Logan, J., Ma, Y., Pradhan, K., Wong, C., & Swanson, J. M.
Affiliations
National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
Volkow, Nora D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
302
Issue
10
Pages
1084
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2071411087
Cited by
728
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 61
FWCI
33.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (ZIAAA000550)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066961)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24DA023464)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dopamine reward pathway, dopamine transporter, D2/D3 receptors, nucleus accumbens, caudate nucleus, adult ADHD, neuroimaging biomarkers, cocaine binding, left hemisphere lateralization, inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Brain Mapping, Carbon Radioisotopes, Cocaine, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Male, Mesencephalon, Synaptic Transmission, Reward, Dopamine Agents, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Raclopride, Positron-Emission Tomography, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review