Cited by 51Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

The latent structure of cognitive and emotional empathy in individuals with autism, first-degree relatives and typical individuals

Open access
Grove, Rachel, Baillie, Andrew, Allison, Carrie, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Hoekstra, Rosa A·2014·Molecular Autism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Empathy is a vital component for social understanding involving the ability to recognise emotion (cognitive empathy) and provide an appropriate affective response (emotional empathy). Autism spectrum conditions have been described as disorders of empathy. First-degree relatives may show some mild traits of the autism spectrum, the broader autism phenotype (BAP). Whether both cognitive and emotional empathy, rather than cognitive empathy alone, are impaired in autism and the BAP is still under debate. Moreover the association between various aspects of empathy is unclear. This study aims to examine the relationship between different components of empathy across individuals with varying levels of genetic vulnerability to autism. METHODS: Factor analyses utilising questionnaire and performance-based task data were implemented among individuals with autism, parents of a child with autism and controls. The relationship between performance-based tasks and behavioural measures of empathy was also explored. RESULTS: A four-factor model including cognitive empathy, emotional empathy, social skills and a performance-based factor fitted the data best irrespective of genetic vulnerability. Individuals with autism displayed impairment on all four factors, with parents showing intermediate difficulties. Performance-based measures of empathy were related in almost equal magnitude to cognitive and emotional empathy latent factors and the social skills factor. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests individuals with autism have difficulties with multiple facets of empathy, while parents show intermediate impairments, providing evidence for a quantitative BAP. Impaired scores on performance-based measures of empathy, often thought to be pure measures of cognitive empathy, were also related to much wider empathy difficulties than impairments in cognitive empathy alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2040-2392-5-42

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relation between the Eyes Test and self-report measures of Cognitive Empathy is mixed; the test has been shown to be both weakly negatively related and weakly positively related to self-reported cognitive empathy.

    “Likewise, the relation between the Eyes Test and self-report measures of Cognitive Empathy is mixed; the test has been shown to be both weakly negatively related (Spreng et al., 2009) and weakly positively related to self-reported cognitive empathy (Grove et al., 2014).”

    From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Grove et al., 2014

    In Results, Table 3 (page unavailable), the factor combining the Eyes and KDEF tasks correlates positively with self-reported cognitive empathy in the autism group (r = 0.32) and parent group (r = 0.48); the control-group correlation is not significant. This supports a positive association in some groups, but the paper reports correlations for a combined performance-task factor, not the Eyes Test alone, and the parent-group correlation is not clearly weak. The negative finding is attributed to Spreng et al., not Grove et al. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Eisenberg N Strayer J Eisenberg N, Strayer J Critical issues in the study of empathy Empathy and its Development 1987 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 3 13
  2. Baron-Cohen S Zelazo PD, Chandler M, Crone E Autism and the empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory Developmental Social Cognitive Neuroscience 2010 New York: Psychology Press 125 138

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grove, R., Baillie, A., Allison, C., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hoekstra, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Grove, Rachel
Venue
Molecular Autism
Published
2014
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
42
ISSN
2040-2392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151679234
Cited by
51
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Molecular Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1017041)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, broader autism phenotype, first-degree relatives, parents of autistic children, social skills

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review