CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 75

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity

Akers, Chris, Engelhardt, Netta, Harlow, Daniel, Penington, Geoff, Vardhan, Shreya·2024·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep06(2024)155
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A bstract: Quantum error correction has given us a natural language for the emergence of spacetime, but the black hole interior poses a challenge for this framework: at late times the apparent number of interior degrees of freedom in effective field theory can vastly exceed the true number of fundamental degrees of freedom, so there can be no isometric (i.e. inner-product preserving) encoding of the former into the latter. In this paper we explain how quantum error correction nonetheless can be used to explain the emergence of the black hole interior, via the idea of “non-isometric codes protected by computational complexity”. We show that many previous ideas, such as the existence of a large number of “null states”, a breakdown of effective field theory for operations of exponential complexity, the quantum extremal surface calculation of the Page curve, post-selection, “state-dependent/state-specific” operator reconstruction, and the “simple entropy” approach to complexity coarse-graining, all fit naturally into this framework, and we illustrate all of these phenomena simultaneously in a soluble model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep06(2024)155

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The holographic encoding map in AdS/CFT: an approximate isometry V : H bulk → H Boundary maps the effective bulk degrees of freedom to the fundamental boundary degrees of freedom.
Figure 1 The holographic encoding map in AdS/CFT: an approximate isometry V : H bulk → H Boundary maps the effective bulk degrees of freedom to the fundamental boundary degrees of freedom.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Subregion duality in AdS/CFT: given a boundary subregion B , its minimal quantum extremal surface X min B divides the bulk space into the entanglement wedge b of B and the entanglement wedge b of B , and all bulk observables in b (or b ) on this low-energy subspace can be represented as operators in B (or B ).
Figure 2 Subregion duality in AdS/CFT: given a boundary subregion B , its minimal quantum extremal surface X min B divides the bulk space into the entanglement wedge b of B and the entanglement wedge b of B , and all bulk observables in b (or b ) on this low-energy subspace can be represented as operators in B (or B ).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Holography for a black hole B radiating into a reservoir R . In the effective picture there are left- and right-moving modes ℓ and r on a 'nice slice' Cauchy surface, and the holographic map V : H ℓ ⊗ H r → H B tells us how these interior modes are encoded in the fundamental degrees of freedom. We will always take V to be a linear map, but in general it cannot be an isometry.
Figure 3 Holography for a black hole B radiating into a reservoir R . In the effective picture there are left- and right-moving modes ℓ and r on a 'nice slice' Cauchy surface, and the holographic map V : H ℓ ⊗ H r → H B tells us how these interior modes are encoded in the fundamental degrees of freedom. We will always take V to be a linear map, but in general it cannot be an isometry.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 Our model holographic map V : a Haar-typical unitary U acts on the effective field theory degrees of freedom ℓ and r in the black hole interior, together with some fixed additional state | ψ 0 〉 f , and then post-selects on some auxilliary degrees of freedom P , resulting in a state of the fundamental degrees of freedom B .
Figure 4 Our model holographic map V : a Haar-typical unitary U acts on the effective field theory degrees of freedom ℓ and r in the black hole interior, together with some fixed additional state | ψ 0 〉 f , and then post-selects on some auxilliary degrees of freedom P , resulting in a state of the fundamental degrees of freedom B .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 Computing the typical overlap between V | ψ 1 〉 and V | ψ 2 〉 . By equation (A.4) the unitary integral connects the indices going into the top/bottom of U to those going into the bottom/top of U † , and then divides by the total dimensionality | P || B | . This factor of the dimensionality is cancelled by the factor of | P | in V † V and a factor of | B | coming from a B index loop.
Figure 5 Computing the typical overlap between V | ψ 1 〉 and V | ψ 2 〉 . By equation (A.4) the unitary integral connects the indices going into the top/bottom of U to those going into the bottom/top of U † , and then divides by the total dimensionality | P || B | . This factor of the dimensionality is cancelled by the factor of | P | in V † V and a factor of | B | coming from a B index loop.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 6 Computing the nontrivial term in the fluctuation of the overlap. The integral connects the indices going into the top/bottom of each U to the indices going into the bottom/top of a U † , but now there are four ways to do these connections: two for the ℓfr indices and two for the BP indices, with the different choices are weighted as in (A.4).
Figure 6 Computing the nontrivial term in the fluctuation of the overlap. The integral connects the indices going into the top/bottom of each U to the indices going into the bottom/top of a U † , but now there are four ways to do these connections: two for the ℓfr indices and two for the BP indices, with the different choices are weighted as in (A.4).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 7 Given a cut γ separating the sphere into two equal-volume halves, the volume of the small neighbourhood γ ε = { x : ∃ y ∈ γ. || x -y || ≤ ε } is minimized when γ lies on an equator of the sphere (left) rather than oscillating in a complex way (right). Somewhat counterintuitively, in high dimensions the fractional volume of γ ε is exponentially close to one, even in the former case.
Figure 7 Given a cut γ separating the sphere into two equal-volume halves, the volume of the small neighbourhood γ ε = { x : ∃ y ∈ γ. || x -y || ≤ ε } is minimized when γ lies on an equator of the sphere (left) rather than oscillating in a complex way (right). Somewhat counterintuitively, in high dimensions the fractional volume of γ ε is exponentially close to one, even in the former case.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 8 Computing the second Renyi entropy of the radiation. B indices are shaded red, L, ℓ indices are shaded blue, and r, R indices are shaded green. The four different ways of contracting the indices through the unitaries as in (A.4) lead to the four terms in (4.4).
Figure 8 Computing the second Renyi entropy of the radiation. B indices are shaded red, L, ℓ indices are shaded blue, and r, R indices are shaded green. The four different ways of contracting the indices through the unitaries as in (A.4) lead to the four terms in (4.4).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 9 The quantum extremal surface calculation of the radiation entropy: at early times the entanglement wedge of the radiation includes only the domain of dependence of R , shaded green in the left diagram, while at late times it also includes an 'island' in the black hole interior. The 'rim' of the island, shown as the second black dot in the right diagram, is the new quantum extremal surface found in [33, 34]. It has an area which is approximately that of the horizon on this time slice, and thus has Area 4 ≈ log | B | .
Figure 9 The quantum extremal surface calculation of the radiation entropy: at early times the entanglement wedge of the radiation includes only the domain of dependence of R , shaded green in the left diagram, while at late times it also includes an 'island' in the black hole interior. The 'rim' of the island, shown as the second black dot in the right diagram, is the new quantum extremal surface found in [33, 34]. It has an area which is approximately that of the horizon on this time slice, and thus has Area 4 ≈ log | B | .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 10 Computing the n th Renyi entropy. There are two terms which can dominate: the one which contracts the ingoing/outgoing indices for each U with the outoing/ingoing indices of the U † just below it, which maximizes the number of red loops, and the one which contracts the ingoing/outgoing indices of each U with the outoing/ingoing indices of the U † which is in the previous column (wrapping around to the last U † for the first U ), which maximizes the number of green loops.
Figure 10 Computing the n th Renyi entropy. There are two terms which can dominate: the one which contracts the ingoing/outgoing indices for each U with the outoing/ingoing indices of the U † just below it, which maximizes the number of red loops, and the one which contracts the ingoing/outgoing indices of each U with the outoing/ingoing indices of the U † which is in the previous column (wrapping around to the last U † for the first U ), which maximizes the number of green loops.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 11 Converting a bulk measurement to a boundary measurement in AdS/CFT. On the left a bulk observer Diana is holding an apparatus which she has just looked at to learn the result of a measurement, but a boundary observer Wendy thinks that Diana and the apparatus are together in a coherent superposition and no definite outcome has been realized. On the right Wendy uses local operators in the fundamental description to sends a 'space mission' into the bulk which retrieves Diana's apparatus and swaps it out of the system, after which Wendy can look at it to learn the measurement outcome.
Figure 11 Converting a bulk measurement to a boundary measurement in AdS/CFT. On the left a bulk observer Diana is holding an apparatus which she has just looked at to learn the result of a measurement, but a boundary observer Wendy thinks that Diana and the apparatus are together in a coherent superposition and no definite outcome has been realized. On the right Wendy uses local operators in the fundamental description to sends a 'space mission' into the bulk which retrieves Diana's apparatus and swaps it out of the system, after which Wendy can look at it to learn the measurement outcome.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 12 The full time-evolution of an evaporating black hole in the fundamental picture. The red lines represent qudits that fall into the black hole from the bath, while the blue lines represent qudits that come out of the black hole as radiation. After n 0 time steps only radiation remains. Note that the outgoing qudits appear in the order they would on the nice slice in figure 3, while the ingoing qudits are reversed (qudits to the right fell in earlier).
Figure 12 The full time-evolution of an evaporating black hole in the fundamental picture. The red lines represent qudits that fall into the black hole from the bath, while the blue lines represent qudits that come out of the black hole as radiation. After n 0 time steps only radiation remains. Note that the outgoing qudits appear in the order they would on the nice slice in figure 3, while the ingoing qudits are reversed (qudits to the right fell in earlier).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 13 Re-interpreting the evolution in the fundamental description as a non-isometric map from the effective description. Here n 0 = 7, m 0 = 3, and t = 2. The factor of √ | P (2) | = | r (2) | is necessary to ensure that the maximally-mixed states contract to give the identity map on R (2) . The diagram on the right is precisely the action of a non-isometric holographic map V 2 ⊗ I R (2) on an effective description state which is arbitrary on ℓ (2) and maximally mixed on r (2) R (2) , with V 2 : H ℓ (2) ⊗H r (2) → H B (2) given by V 2 = √ | P (2) |〈 MAX | R (2) ,r (2) U 2 U 1 U 0 | ψ 0 〉 f . Note the clear resemblance to figure 4.
Figure 13 Re-interpreting the evolution in the fundamental description as a non-isometric map from the effective description. Here n 0 = 7, m 0 = 3, and t = 2. The factor of √ | P (2) | = | r (2) | is necessary to ensure that the maximally-mixed states contract to give the identity map on R (2) . The diagram on the right is precisely the action of a non-isometric holographic map V 2 ⊗ I R (2) on an effective description state which is arbitrary on ℓ (2) and maximally mixed on r (2) R (2) , with V 2 : H ℓ (2) ⊗H r (2) → H B (2) given by V 2 = √ | P (2) |〈 MAX | R (2) ,r (2) U 2 U 1 U 0 | ψ 0 〉 f . Note the clear resemblance to figure 4.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 14 The recursive step in defining the holographic map V t : H ℓ ( t ) ⊗H r ( t ) → H B ( t ) . To obtain V t +1 we act on V t with U t +1 and then post-select the two new outgoing qudits in R ( t +1) down to become the new qudits in r ( t +1) in the effective description.
Figure 14 The recursive step in defining the holographic map V t : H ℓ ( t ) ⊗H r ( t ) → H B ( t ) . To obtain V t +1 we act on V t with U t +1 and then post-select the two new outgoing qudits in R ( t +1) down to become the new qudits in r ( t +1) in the effective description.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 15 Equivariance of the holographic map under time evolution: acting with the effective-description dynamics at time t and then encoding with V t +1 is the same as encoding with V t at time t and then acting with the fundamental-description dynamics.
Figure 15 Equivariance of the holographic map under time evolution: acting with the effective-description dynamics at time t and then encoding with V t +1 is the same as encoding with V t at time t and then acting with the fundamental-description dynamics.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 16 Outermost wedges of various subsets of the fundamental degrees of freedom for an evaporating black hole.
Figure 16 Outermost wedges of various subsets of the fundamental degrees of freedom for an evaporating black hole.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 17 Back-reaction on the global geometry of an evaporating black hole caused by disturbing a right-moving interior mode. The orange line is the collapsing shell which formed the black hole, the thin vertical black line is the join between the radiation system and the black hole region, the red line is the shockwave which is created by disturbing the mode, the horizontal thin black line is the Cauchy slice on which we disturb the mode, and the purple lines are singularities. The dashed lines are future/past horizons. Note in particular the appearance of a past singularity in the back-reacted geometry, which didn't exist for the black hole formed from collapse. The green arrow is an infalling mode which in the unperturbed geometry can be evolved back out to the radiation, but which evolves back to the past singularity in the back-reacted geometry.
Figure 17 Back-reaction on the global geometry of an evaporating black hole caused by disturbing a right-moving interior mode. The orange line is the collapsing shell which formed the black hole, the thin vertical black line is the join between the radiation system and the black hole region, the red line is the shockwave which is created by disturbing the mode, the horizontal thin black line is the Cauchy slice on which we disturb the mode, and the purple lines are singularities. The dashed lines are future/past horizons. Note in particular the appearance of a past singularity in the back-reacted geometry, which didn't exist for the black hole formed from collapse. The green arrow is an infalling mode which in the unperturbed geometry can be evolved back out to the radiation, but which evolves back to the past singularity in the back-reacted geometry.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 18 Outermost wedges for B , R , and BR in the back-reacted geometry, shaded blue. Note that the outermost QES for B is not the same as the outermost QES for BR ; the former is the QES used in [33, 34] to compute the Page curve, while the latter is the new QES constructed in [53].
Figure 18 Outermost wedges for B , R , and BR in the back-reacted geometry, shaded blue. Note that the outermost QES for B is not the same as the outermost QES for BR ; the former is the QES used in [33, 34] to compute the Page curve, while the latter is the new QES constructed in [53].CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 19 Acting with an interior unitary W ℓr in the dynamical model. The unitary acts on the two orange lines.
Figure 19 Acting with an interior unitary W ℓr in the dynamical model. The unitary acts on the two orange lines.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 20 Two possible bulges for B and R for the evaporating black hole perturbed by a generic W ℓr , indicated by the black dots. The shaded regions are their outer wedges assuming we are looking to construct X bulge R , the causal complements of these are their outer wedges as candidates for X bulge B . We have also shown the analogous cuts through the quantum circuit for our dynamical model.
Figure 20 Two possible bulges for B and R for the evaporating black hole perturbed by a generic W ℓr , indicated by the black dots. The shaded regions are their outer wedges assuming we are looking to construct X bulge R , the causal complements of these are their outer wedges as candidates for X bulge B . We have also shown the analogous cuts through the quantum circuit for our dynamical model.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 21 Interior modes in a one-sided AdS collapse. The left boundary of the diagram is the origin of polar coordinates, while the right boundary is the AdS boundary. The collapsing shell is shown in orange. Neighboring left and right movers are entangled on the nice slice, since the left movers arise from Hawking quanta which are reflected back into the black hole as shown with the dashed lines.
Figure 21 Interior modes in a one-sided AdS collapse. The left boundary of the diagram is the origin of polar coordinates, while the right boundary is the AdS boundary. The collapsing shell is shown in orange. Neighboring left and right movers are entangled on the nice slice, since the left movers arise from Hawking quanta which are reflected back into the black hole as shown with the dashed lines.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 22 A few time steps in a dynamical model of a one-sided AdS black hole formed from a fast collapse. On the left we have the fundamental CFT dynamics. The initial state of the infalling shell is encoded into a few adjustable qudits ℓ 0 and then a fixed state | ψ 0 〉 f . It evolves unitarily, with the radiated qudits, shown in red, being reabsorbed by the black hole after a time of order ℓ ads (each time step is of order ℓ ads ). On the right we re-interpret this evolution as defining a non-isometric map from the interior modes ℓ and r to the CFT degrees of freedom B , with the non-isometry arising from the post-selection on these modes just as in figure 13. We have allowed the unitary at each time step to be different, but to model the usual situation with no sources in the dual CFT it is natural to take all the U i to be the same.
Figure 22 A few time steps in a dynamical model of a one-sided AdS black hole formed from a fast collapse. On the left we have the fundamental CFT dynamics. The initial state of the infalling shell is encoded into a few adjustable qudits ℓ 0 and then a fixed state | ψ 0 〉 f . It evolves unitarily, with the radiated qudits, shown in red, being reabsorbed by the black hole after a time of order ℓ ads (each time step is of order ℓ ads ). On the right we re-interpret this evolution as defining a non-isometric map from the interior modes ℓ and r to the CFT degrees of freedom B , with the non-isometry arising from the post-selection on these modes just as in figure 13. We have allowed the unitary at each time step to be different, but to model the usual situation with no sources in the dual CFT it is natural to take all the U i to be the same.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 23 The black hole final state proposal: left-moving and right-moving interior modes are jointly post-selected on at the singularity, leading to a circuit which unitarily maps the state of the collapsing matter to the Hawking radiation. Note the similarity to figure 4 and especially figure 13.
Figure 23 The black hole final state proposal: left-moving and right-moving interior modes are jointly post-selected on at the singularity, leading to a circuit which unitarily maps the state of the collapsing matter to the Hawking radiation. Note the similarity to figure 4 and especially figure 13.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 24 The sums over the s m and s ′ m associated with each U m appearing the average of (I.5) can be seen as a partition function on the above lattice (we have shown the case where n 0 = 7, m 0 = 3, and t = 3). Each red vertex on the graph, other those fixed at the boundaries, can have either an ↑ or ↓ spin, and the total weight of any spin configuration can be obtained by multiplying the weights associated with each of the interactions, which are as shown on the right. The contraction of | ψ 0 , ↑〉 with either 〈↑ | or 〈↓ | contributes a factor of 1.
Figure 24 The sums over the s m and s ′ m associated with each U m appearing the average of (I.5) can be seen as a partition function on the above lattice (we have shown the case where n 0 = 7, m 0 = 3, and t = 3). Each red vertex on the graph, other those fixed at the boundaries, can have either an ↑ or ↓ spin, and the total weight of any spin configuration can be obtained by multiplying the weights associated with each of the interactions, which are as shown on the right. The contraction of | ψ 0 , ↑〉 with either 〈↑ | or 〈↓ | contributes a factor of 1.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 25 The two configurations, (a) and (b), which can dominate in the partition function (I.5), as well as a third (c) which is suppressed compared to (b) by a factor of 1 /q .
Figure 25 The two configurations, (a) and (b), which can dominate in the partition function (I.5), as well as a third (c) which is suppressed compared to (b) by a factor of 1 /q .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 26 Partition function for exp( -S 2 (Ψ R )), with two possible dominant configurations. Note that | χ { in } ℓ , ↑〉 on the lower boundary gives a factor of 1 when connected to ↑ , and exp( -S 2 ( χ { in } ℓ )) when connected to ↓ .
Figure 26 Partition function for exp( -S 2 (Ψ R )), with two possible dominant configurations. Note that | χ { in } ℓ , ↑〉 on the lower boundary gives a factor of 1 when connected to ↑ , and exp( -S 2 ( χ { in } ℓ )) when connected to ↓ .CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 100

  1. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  5. A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [hep-th/0606141] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2012) 165 [arXiv:1201.3664] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  7. R. Bousso et al., Null Geodesics, Local CFT Operators and AdS/CFT for Subregions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064057 [arXiv:1209.4641] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. D. Harlow, The Ryu–Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. P. Hayden et al., Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. C. Akers, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Large Breakdowns of Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126006 [arXiv:1908.03975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. C. Akers and G. Penington, Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription, JHEP 04 (2021) 062 [arXiv:2008.03319] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. C. Akers and G. Penington, Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 157 [arXiv:2109.14618] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. S.D. Mathur, The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. D. Marolf and A.C. Wall, Eternal Black Holes and Superselection in AdS/CFT, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 025001 [arXiv:1210.3590] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. E. Verlinde and H. Verlinde, Black Hole Entanglement and Quantum Error Correction, JHEP 10 (2013) 107 [arXiv:1211.6913] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. A. Almheiri et al., An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  21. D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, Gauge/Gravity Duality and the Black Hole Interior, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171301 [arXiv:1307.4706] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. J.V. Rocha, Evaporation of large black holes in AdS: Coupling to the evaporon, JHEP 08 (2008) 075 [arXiv:0804.0055] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120 [arXiv:0708.4025] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Y. Kiem, H.L. Verlinde and E.P. Verlinde, Black hole horizons and complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 7053 [hep-th/9502074] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. D.L. Jafferis, Bulk reconstruction and the Hartle-Hawking wavefunction, arXiv:1703.01519 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  27. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the Alpha-bits of Black Holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. A. Almheiri, Holographic Quantum Error Correction and the Projected Black Hole Interior, arXiv:1810.02055 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  29. L. Susskind, Computational Complexity and Black Hole Horizons, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 24 [arXiv:1403.5695] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. L. Susskind, The Typical-State Paradox: Diagnosing Horizons with Complexity, Fortsch. Phys. 64 (2016) 84 [arXiv:1507.02287] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Decoding the Apparent Horizon: Coarse-Grained Holographic Entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 211301 [arXiv:1706.02038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Coarse Graining Holographic Black Holes, JHEP 05 (2019) 160 [arXiv:1806.01281] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. A. Bouland, B. Fefferman and U. Vazirani, Computational pseudorandomness, the wormhole growth paradox, and constraints on the AdS/CFT duality, arXiv:1910.14646 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. I.H. Kim, E. Tang and J. Preskill, The ghost in the radiation: robust encodings of the black hole interior (invited paper), JHEP 06 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2003.05451] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. N. Engelhardt, G. Penington and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A world without pythons would be so simple, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 234001 [arXiv:2102.07774] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. N. Engelhardt, G. Penington and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Finding pythons in unexpected places, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (2022) 094002 [arXiv:2105.09316] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. G.T. Horowitz and J.M. Maldacena, The black hole final state, JHEP 02 (2004) 008 [hep-th/0310281] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. D.N. Page, Average entropy of a subsystem, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1291 [gr-qc/9305007] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. E.S. Meckes, The random matrix theory of the classical compact groups, vol. 218, Cambridge University Press (2019). · DOI
  40. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. J.S. Cotler et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices, JHEP 05 (2017) 118 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2018) 002] [arXiv:1611.04650] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  42. D. Harlow and D. Jafferis, The Factorization Problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity, JHEP 02 (2020) 177 [arXiv:1804.01081] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  43. L. Susskind, Black Holes at Exp-time, arXiv:2006.01280 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  44. C. Akers and P. Rath, Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction, JHEP 05 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1811.05171] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2019) 240 [arXiv:1811.05382] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, Remarks on the necessity and implications of state-dependence in the black hole interior, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 084049 [arXiv:1503.08825] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065 [arXiv:0808.2096] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. N. Lashkari et al., Towards the Fast Scrambling Conjecture, JHEP 04 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1111.6580] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. W. Brown and O. Fawzi, Scrambling speed of random quantum circuits, arXiv:1210.6644 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  50. S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Black holes and the butterfly effect, JHEP 03 (2014) 067 [arXiv:1306.0622] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. V.E. Hubeny and M. Rangamani, Causal Holographic Information, JHEP 06 (2012) 114 [arXiv:1204.1698] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  52. W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1309.3610] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, No Simple Dual to the Causal Holographic Information?, JHEP 04 (2017) 134 [arXiv:1702.01748] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. R. Bousso, V. Chandrasekaran and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, From black hole entropy to energy-minimizing states in QFT, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 046001 [arXiv:1906.05299] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. N. Engelhardt, G. Penington and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Twice upon a time: timelike-separated quantum extremal surfaces, JHEP 01 (2024) 033 [arXiv:2308.16226] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. A. Almheiri and H.W. Lin, The entanglement wedge of unknown couplings, JHEP 08 (2022) 062 [arXiv:2111.06298] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. D. Harlow and J.-Q. Wu, Algebra of diffeomorphism-invariant observables in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, JHEP 05 (2022) 097 [arXiv:2108.04841] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement, Gen. Rel. Grav. 42 (2010) 2323 [arXiv:1005.3035] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  59. N. Engelhardt and Å. Folkestad, Canonical purification of evaporating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 086010 [arXiv:2201.08395] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. Y. Zhao, Collision in the interior of wormhole, JHEP 03 (2020) 144 [arXiv:2011.06016] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  61. F.M. Haehl and Y. Zhao, Diagnosing collisions in the interior of a wormhole, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) L021901 [arXiv:2104.02736] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. F.M. Haehl and Y. Zhao, Collisions of localized shocks and quantum circuits, JHEP 09 (2022) 002 [arXiv:2202.04661] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  63. A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  64. A. Strominger, Black hole entropy from near horizon microstates, JHEP 02 (1998) 009 [hep-th/9712251] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  65. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  66. G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  67. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  68. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  69. D. Harlow and E. Shaghoulian, Global symmetry, Euclidean gravity, and the black hole information problem, JHEP 04 (2021) 175 [arXiv:2010.10539] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  70. S.R. Coleman, Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 867 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  71. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, arXiv:1806.06840 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  72. Y. Aharonov, P.G. Bergmann and J.L. Lebowitz, Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement, Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) B1410 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  73. D. Gottesman and J. Preskill, Comment on ‘The Black hole final state’, JHEP 03 (2004) 026 [hep-th/0311269] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  74. S. Lloyd and J. Preskill, Unitarity of black hole evaporation in final-state projection models, JHEP 08 (2014) 126 [arXiv:1308.4209] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  75. K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, Black Hole Interior in the Holographic Correspondence and the Information Paradox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 051301 [arXiv:1310.6334] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  76. D. Harlow, Aspects of the Papadodimas-Raju Proposal for the Black Hole Interior, JHEP 11 (2014) 055 [arXiv:1405.1995] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  77. D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, Violations of the Born rule in cool state-dependent horizons, JHEP 01 (2016) 008 [arXiv:1506.01337] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  78. I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena, Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS2 gravity, arXiv:1707.02325 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  79. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, JHEP 08 (2020) 032 [arXiv:1910.00972] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  80. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, C. Li and O. Parrikar, Quantum error correction in the black hole interior, JHEP 07 (2023) 189 [arXiv:2203.01961] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  81. T. Anous, J. Kruthoff and R. Mahajan, Density matrices in quantum gravity, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 045 [arXiv:2006.17000] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  82. K. Langhoff and Y. Nomura, Ensemble from Coarse Graining: Reconstructing the Interior of an Evaporating Black Hole, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 086021 [arXiv:2008.04202] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  83. A. Blommaert, L.V. Iliesiu and J. Kruthoff, Alpha states demystified — towards microscopic models of AdS2 holography, JHEP 08 (2022) 071 [arXiv:2203.07384] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  84. R. Chao, B.W. Reichardt, C. Sutherland and T. Vidick, Overlapping qubits, arXiv:1701.01062 [https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2017.48]. · DOI
  85. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous and R. de Wolf, Quantum Fingerprinting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 167902 [quant-ph/0102001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  86. R. Bousso, Violations of the Equivalence Principle by a Nonlocally Reconstructed Vacuum at the Black Hole Horizon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 041102 [arXiv:1308.3697] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  87. M. Van Raamsdonk, Evaporating Firewalls, JHEP 11 (2014) 038 [arXiv:1307.1796] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  88. B. Guo, M.R.R. Hughes, S.D. Mathur and M. Mehta, Contrasting the fuzzball and wormhole paradigms for black holes, Turk. J. Phys. 45 (2021) 281 [arXiv:2111.05295] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  89. R. Bousso and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Quantum singularities, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 066002 [arXiv:2206.07001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  90. D. Harlow and L. Susskind, Crunches, Hats, and a Conjecture, arXiv:1012.5302 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  91. B. Collins and P. Śniady, Integration with Respect to the Haar Measure on Unitary, Orthogonal and Symplectic Group, Commun. Math. Phys. 264 (2006) 773 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  92. W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation theory: a first course, vol. 129, Springer Science & Business Media (2013).
  93. C. Dankert, R. Cleve, J. Emerson and E. Livine, Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation, Phys. Rev. A 80 (2009) 012304 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  94. G.W. Anderson, A. Guionnet and O. Zeitouni, An introduction to random matrices, Cambridge university press (2010). · DOI
  95. M. Émery and J.E. Yukich, A simple proof of the logarithmic sobolev inequality on the circle, Séminaire de probabilités de Strasbourg 21 (1987) 173. · DOI
  96. D. Bakry and M. Émery, Diffusions hypercontractives, in Seminaire de probabilités XIX 1983/84, Springer (1985) pp. 177–206. · DOI
  97. M. Gromov and V.D. Milman, A topological application of the isoperimetric inequality, Am. J. MAth. 105 (1983) 843. · DOI
  98. S.J. Szarek, Spaces with large distance to $$ {\ell}_{\infty}^n $$ and random matrices, Am. J. MAth. 112 (1990) 899. · DOI
  99. A. Nahum, S. Vijay and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 021014 [arXiv:1705.08975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  100. C. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and S. Sondhi, Operator hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and entanglement growth in systems without conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 021013 [arXiv:1705.08910] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akers, C., Engelhardt, N., Harlow, D., Penington, G., & Vardhan, S.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-06-24
Volume
2024
Issue
6
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep06(2024)155
Cited by
75
References
32
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review