Cited by 158Light effects on plantsDNA Repair MechanismsPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Molecular Evolution of the Photolyase–Blue-Light Photoreceptor Family

Kanai, Satoru, Kikuno, Reiko, Toh, Hiroyuki, Ryo, Haruko, Todo, Takeshi·1997·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

The photolyase-blue-light photoreceptor family is composed of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) photolyases, (6-4) photolyases, and blue-light photoreceptors. CPD photolyase and (6-4) photolyase are involved in photoreactivation for CPD and (6-4) photoproducts, respectively. CPD photolyase is classified into two subclasses, class I and II, based on amino acid sequence similarity. Blue-light photoreceptors are essential light detectors for the early development of plants. The amino acid sequence of the receptor is similar to those of the photolyases, although the receptor does not show the activity of photoreactivation. To investigate the functional divergence of the family, the amino acid sequences of the proteins were aligned. The alignment suggested that the recognition mechanisms of the cofactors and the substrate of class I CPD photolyases (class I photolyases) are different from those of class II CPD photolyases (class II photolyases). We reconstructed the phylogenetic trees based on the alignment by the NJ method and the ML method. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the ancestral gene of the family had encoded CPD photolyase and that the gene duplication of the ancestral proteins had occurred at least eight times before the divergence between eubacteria and eukaryotes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/pl00006258

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The LUCA lineage contained photolyase.

    “Phylogenetic analyses indicate that photolyase was present in the lineage of the Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA) and that the observed paraphyletic distribution across the three domains is due to widespread gene loss (Heijde et al. 2010;Kanai et al. 1997).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanai, S., Kikuno, R., Toh, H., Ryo, H., & Todo, T.
Affiliations
  • Biomolecular Engineering Research Institute (Japan) (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
1997-11
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
535-548
ISSN
0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2364878906
Cited by
158
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
(6-4) photolyase, blue-light photoreceptor, photoreactivation, functional divergence, gene duplication, phylogenetic analysis
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Deoxyribodipyrimidine Photo-Lyase, Molecular Sequence Data, Photoreceptor Cells, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review