Cited by 2,695Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementHealth Education and Validation

The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or spearman-brown?

Open access
Eisinga, Rob, Grotenhuis, Manfred te, Pelzer, Ben·2013·International Journal of Public Health

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Michal M, Zwerenz R, Tschan R, Edinger J, Lichy M, Knebel A, Tuin I, Beutel M. Screening for depersonalization-derealization with two items of the Cambridge depersonalization scale. Psychother Psych Med 2010;60:175-9.
  2. Hulin C, Netemeyer R, Cudeck R. Can a reliability coefficient be too high? J Consum Psychol 2001;10:55-8.
  3. Lord FM, Novick MR. Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley; 1968.
  4. Hancock GR, Mueller RO. Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In Cudeck R, Du Toit S, Sörbom D (Eds), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 2001:195-216.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Eisinga, Rob
Venue
International Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
58
Issue
4
Pages
637-642
ISSN
  • 1661-8556 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-8564
OpenAlex
W1995949104
Cited by
2,695
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 332 · 2025: 264 · 2024: 306 · 2023: 322 · 2022: 298 · 2021: 251 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 165 · 2018: 160 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 123 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 17
FWCI
58.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
scale reliability, Pearson correlation, Cronbach's alpha, Spearman-Brown formula, internal consistency, psychometric assessment
MeSH terms
Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review