Cited by 37Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesSports injuries and preventionMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and measurement properties of the Spanish version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI-Sp) scale

Sala-Barat, Esther, Álvarez-Díaz, Pedro, Alentorn-Geli, Eduard, Webster, Kate E., Cugat, Ramón, Tomás-Sabado, Joaquín·2020·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose To translate into Spanish and validate the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale, and to evaluate the psychological factors that have the greatest impact on the return to play among Spanish football players. Methods The ACL-RSI was first translated into Spanish by two teams of bilingual experts. At the time of discharge, 114 amateur and semi-professional football players who underwent ACL reconstruction answered a questionnaire regarding demographic and injury-related data, along with the translated ACL-RSI, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11SV) and the injury-psychological readiness to return to sport (I-PRRS). Statistical analysis included reliability tests (Cronbach's alpha and test-retest), construct validity and exploratory factor analysis. Results The ACL-RSI-Sp showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.9), temporal stability (test-retest r = 0.9) and significant moderate correlations with the KOOS subscales of symptoms (r = 0.4; p Conclusions The ACL-RSI-Sp was a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the relevant psychological factors in the return to sports of Spanish football players after ACL reconstruction. Players' confidence in performance and fear and insecurity were the most important factors influencing the return to play in this population. Level of evidence Level IV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-019-05517-z

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Ardern CL, Osterberg A, Tagesson S, Gauffin H, Webster KE et al (2014) The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 48:1613–1619 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lefevre N, Webster K, Herman S (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1192–1196 · DOI
  4. Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen T, Zhang P, Li Y, Webster K, Zhang J et al (2017) Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. PLoS One 12:e0183095 · DOI
  6. Fältström A, Hägglund M, Kvist J (2016) Factors associated with playing football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 26:1343–1352 · DOI
  7. Glazer DD (2009) Development and preliminary validation of the injury-psychological readiness to return to sport (I-PRRS) scale. J Athl Train 44:185–189 · DOI
  8. Gómez P, Sainz de Baranda P, Ortega E, Contreras O, Olmedilla A (2014) Diseño y validación de un cuestionario sobre la percepción del deportista respecto a su reincorporación al entrenamiento (Design and validation of a questionnaire about the perception of the athlete regarding their re-entry into training). Revista de Psicología del Deporte 23:479–487 (Spanish)
  9. Harput G, Tok D, Ulusoy B, Eraslan L, Yildiz TI et al (2017) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:159–164 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Herring SA, Kibler WB, Putukian M (2012) The team physician and the return-to-play decision: a consensus statement-2012 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:2446–2448 · DOI
  11. Corp IBM (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk
  12. Kaiser HF (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 20:141–151 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD (1990) Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manag 3:35–43
  14. Kvist J, Österberg A, Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Webster K et al (2013) Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-Return to sports after injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23:568–575 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Lai CCH, Ardern CL, Feller JA, Webster KE (2018) Eighty-three per cent of elite athletes return to preinjury sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review with meta-analysis of return to sport rates, graft rupture rates and performance outcomes. Br J Sports Med 52:128–138 · DOI
  16. Lynch AD, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, Eitzen I, Hicks GE et al (2015) Consensus criteria for defining ‘successful outcome’ after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware–Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med 49:335–342 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Meeuwisse WH, Tyreman H, Hagel B, Emery C (2007) A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation. Clin J Sport Med 17:215–219 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96 · DOI
  19. Slagers AJ, Reininga IH, van den Akker-Scheek I (2017) The Dutch language anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury scale (ACL-RSI)—validity and reliability. J Sports Sci 35:393–401 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL et al (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Vaquero J, Longo UG, Forriol F, Martinelli N, Vethencourt R et al (2014) Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) in patients with chondral lesion of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:104–108 · DOI
  22. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C (2008) Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 9:9–15 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Webster KE, Feller JA, Whitehead TS (2017) Return to sport following ACL reconstruction: the Australian Experience. In: Musahl V, Karlsson J, Kuroda R, Zaffagnini S (eds) Rotatory knee instability. Springer International Publishing, Basel, pp 413–425 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sala-Barat, E., Álvarez-Díaz, P., Alentorn-Geli, E., Webster, K. E., Cugat, R., & Tomás-Sabado, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • La Trobe University (AU)
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-14
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
833-839
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W2946806115
Cited by
37
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, return to sport, ACL-RSI scale, Spanish translation, cross-cultural adaptation, football players, psychological factors, kinesiophobia, performance confidence, fear and insecurity, quality of life, measurement properties
MeSH terms
Return to Sport, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Adolescent, Adult, Fear, Female, Football, Humans, Male, Pain, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Soccer, Translations, Reproducibility of Results, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Young Adult, Athletes, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review