Cited by 128Vitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchStress Responses and CortisolAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress

A randomized controlled trial of high dose ascorbic acid for reduction of blood pressure, cortisol, and subjective responses to psychological stress

Brody, Stuart, Preut, Ragnar, Schommer, Kerstin, Schürmeyer, Thomas H.·2002·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Physiological responses to stress are considered disruptive to health. High-dose ascorbic acid has reduced indices of stress in laboratory animals.Methods We conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled 14-day trial of sustained-release ascorbic acid (60 healthy young adults; 3 x1000 mg/day Cetebe) and placebo (60 healthy young adults) for reduction of blood pressure, cortisol, and subjective response to acute psychological stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST, consisting of public speaking and mental arithmetic). Six subjects from each group were excluded.Results Compared to the placebo group, the ascorbic acid group had less systolic blood pressure (an increase of 23 versus 31 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure, and subjective stress responses to the TSST; and also had faster salivary cortisol recovery (but not smaller overall cortisol response). Cortisol response to 1 microg ACTH, and reported side-effects during the trial did not differ between groups. Plasma ascorbic acid level at the end of the trial but not pre-trial was associated with reduced stress reactivity of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and subjective stress, and with greater salivary cortisol recovery.Conclusions Treatment with high-dose sustained-release ascorbic acid palliates blood pressure, cortisol, and subjective response to acute psychological stress. These effects are not attributable to modification of adrenal responsiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-001-0929-6

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brody, S., Preut, R., Schommer, K., & Schürmeyer, T. H.
Affiliations
Universität Trier (DE)
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2001-11-20
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
319-324
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2131218255
Cited by
127
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universität Trier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Keywords
high-dose ascorbic acid, vitamin C, blood pressure, cortisol, acute psychological stress, stress reactivity, Trier Social Stress Test, plasma ascorbic acid levels, ACTH response, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Antioxidants, Ascorbic Acid, Blood Pressure, Delayed-Action Preparations, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Stress, Psychological, Chi-Square Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review