Cited by 254Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Transition to drug addiction: a negative reinforcement model based on an allostatic decrease in reward function

Ahmed, Serge H., Koob, George F.·2005·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale The transition from initial drug use to drug addiction has been proposed to result from an allostatic decrease in reward function driven by an overactivation of brain antireward processes. Objectives How decreased reward function explains compulsive drug use is not entirely clear at present, and is still a subject for debate. Methods We present a quantitative model of cocaine self-administration that integrates pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and motivational factors to address this question. The model assumes that reward system responsivity is a homeostatically regulated process where the desired level of responsivity (called the reward set point) is initially different from the baseline level. The reduction or correction of this difference or error in reward function would drive cocaine self-administration. Results Theoretical data obtained by computer simulation fit the experimental data obtained in animals self-administering cocaine (i.e., the within-session pattern of self-injections, the shape and curvature of the dose-injection function, the nonlinear relationship between drug intake and regulated drug effects). Importantly, simulation of an allostatic decrease in reward system responsivity exacerbates the initial error that drives self-administration, thereby increasing both the intake of, and the motivation for, the drug. This allostatic change manifests as a vertical shift in the dose-injection function similar to that seen in animals with escalating cocaine self-administration. Conclusions The present model provides a satisfactory explanation of escalated drug intake and suggests a novel negative reinforcement view of addiction based on an allostatic decrease in reward function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-005-2180-z

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, S. H., & Koob, G. F.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ahmed, Serge H.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2005-02-25
Volume
180
Issue
3
Pages
473-490
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2152911335
Cited by
254
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA04398, R01DA004398)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
drug addiction, cocaine self-administration, negative reinforcement, compulsive drug use
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Algorithms, Animals, Cocaine, Computer Simulation, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Self Administration, Neural Networks, Computer, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review