Cited by 87Psychedelics and Drug StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTreatment of Major Depression

The psychotherapeutic potential of MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine): An evidence-based review

Parrott, A. C.·2007·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Unlabelled AIMS AND RATIONALE: The purpose of this study was to review whether methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has the appropriate pharmacodynamic profile to be a therapeutic agent.Materials and methods Empirical descriptions of MDMA's subjective effects in humans will be reviewed to evaluate the proposal that MDMA has psychotherapeutic properties. The focus will be published evidence on its functional effects in therapeutic, medical, and other situations.Results MDMA is a powerful central nervous system (CNS) stimulant which affects several neurotransmitter systems and intensifies a range of psychobiological functions. Its acute mood effects can be very positive and life enhancing, and the affirmative cognitions engendered during MDMA therapy may well endure afterwards. However, MDMA also has a number of potential anti-therapeutic characteristics. Acutely, it can also intensify negative cognitions, and these may similarly endure over time. Psychotherapists have found that setting, intention, and expectancy are crucial for a positive outcome, but these factors cannot be guaranteed. Post-MDMA, there is a period of neurotransmitter recovery when low moods predominate, and these may exacerbate psychiatric distress. The explanations proposed for MDMA-assisted therapy are all psychodynamic, and a neurochemical model needs to be outlined. It has been suggested that enduring therapeutic gains can follow a single session, but again, this lacks a clear psychopharmacological rationale. Finally, diathesis-stress models suggest that psychiatric individuals are more prone to acute and chronic abreactions to CNS stimulants such as MDMA.Conclusions There are a number of issues which need to be addressed before it can be argued that MDMA might be clinically useful for psychotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-007-0703-5

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parrott, A. C.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Parrott, A. C.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2007-02-13
Volume
191
Issue
2
Pages
181-193
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2147606470
Cited by
87
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
MDMA, ecstasy, MDMA-assisted psychotherapy, psychostimulants, neurotransmitter systems, mood improvement, negative thinking, diathesis-stress model, psychodynamic theory
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Mental Disorders, Hallucinogens, Humans, Models, Biological, Neural Pathways, Psychotherapy, Serotonin Agents, Patient Selection, N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review