Cited by 44Pain Management and Placebo EffectPain Management and Opioid UsePain Mechanisms and Treatments

Specifying the non-specific factors underlying opioid analgesia: expectancy, attention, and affect

Open access
Atlas, Lauren Y., Wielgosz, Joseph, Whittington, Robert A., Wager, Tor D.·2014·Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Rationale Psychological processes such as expectancy, attention, and affect directly influence clinical outcomes. These factors are grouped together as "nonspecific" factors, or placebo effects, in the medical literature, and their individual contributions are rarely considered. The pain-reducing effects of analgesic treatments may reflect changes in these psychological factors, rather than pure drug effects on pain. Furthermore, drug effects may not be isolated by drug vs. placebo comparisons if drugs interact with relevant psychological processes.Objectives We sought to determine whether the analgesic effects of opioid and placebo treatment are mediated by changes in attention, expectancy, or affect.Methods We crossed intravenous administration of a potent opioid analgesic, remifentanil, with information about drug delivery (treatment expectancy or placebo) using a balanced placebo design. We measured drug and treatment expectancy effects on pain, attention, and responses to emotional images. We also examined interactions with cue-based expectations about noxious stimulation or stimulus expectancy.Results Pain was additively influenced by treatment expectancy, stimulus expectancy, and drug concentration. Attention performance showed a small but significant interaction between drug and treatment expectancy. Finally, remifentanil enhanced responses to both positive and negative emotional images.Conclusions The pain-relieving effects of opioid drugs are unlikely to be mediated by changes in threat or affective processing. Standard open-label opioid administration influences multiple clinically relevant cognitive and emotional processes. Psychological factors can combine with drug effects to influence multiple outcomes in distinct ways. The influence of specific psychological factors should be considered when developing and testing pharmacological treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00213-013-3296-1

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longitudinal observational research supports a strong bidirectional link between mood disorders and persistent pain.

    “longitudinal, observational research supports a strong bidirectional link between mood disorders and persistent pain”
  • Depression, anxiety, and distress are among the strongest and most robust psychosocial predictors of transition from acute to chronic pain.

    “psychosocial variables such as depression, anxiety, and distress are among the most potent and robust predictors of the transition from acute to chronic pain 13–18.”
  • Developing an enduring pain condition substantially increases vulnerability for a later diagnosis of an affective disorder.

    “the development of an enduring pain condition confers a substantially increased vulnerability for the subsequent diagnosis of an affective disorder”
  • Depression and anxiety are linked to chronic pain and increased pain sensitivity.

    “An abundance of evidence links depression and anxiety to chronic pain and increased pain sensitivity 11, 13, 32, 41.”
  • Catastrophizing is associated with higher pain levels, poorer physical functioning and disability, and increased pain interference.

    “catastrophizing is associated with higher pain levels, poorer physical functioning and disability, and increased pain interference 13, 32, 278, 279.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atlas, L. Y., Wielgosz, J., Whittington, R. A., & Wager, T. D.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Atlas, Lauren Y.
Venue
Psychopharmacology
Published
2013-10-06
Volume
231
Issue
5
Pages
813-823
ISSN
  • 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2072
OpenAlex
W2153467347
Cited by
44
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076136)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA027794, R01DA035484)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
opioid analgesia, placebo effect, treatment expectancy, stimulus expectancy, attention, affect, remifentanil, pain perception, threat processing
MeSH terms
Remifentanil, Adult, Affect, Analgesics, Opioid, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Piperidines, Placebo Effect, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review