Cited by 46Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFluorine in Organic Chemistry

An automated high-throughput SPE micro-elution method for perfluoroalkyl substances in human serum

Huber, Sandra, Brox, Jan·2015·Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Abstract

An automated high-throughput solid phase extraction (SPE) micro-elution method for 8 perfluorosulfonic acids, 11 perfluorocarboxylic acids and fluorooctane sulfonamide in human serum was developed. Importance was attached to the application of small volumes of reagents and solvents in addition to low sample volumes (50 μL) in order to save the highly valuable sample material for follow-up and other studies. Instrumental analysis was performed by ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The recoveries of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) were satisfactory and between 70 and 120% for most of the compounds at the three investigated spike concentrations. Perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS) was slightly underestimated at high concentrations (20 ng/mL; 67%), whereas perfluoropentanoate (PFPA), perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were overestimated with 134, 131 and 133% respectively, at low spike concentrations (0.2 ng/mL). The precision of the method was below 20% coefficient of variation (CV%) for all target compounds with the only exception of PFOS (22%) at low spike concentrations. Method detection limits ranged from 0.006 to 0.34 ng/mL. High sensitivity, accuracy, repeatability and robustness have been demonstrated for an appropriate concentration range. The applicability for real samples was satisfactory demonstrated by analysis of 40 sera samples from the general population from Tromsø, Norway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00216-015-8601-x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huber, S., & Brox, J.
Affiliations
University Hospital of North Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Huber, Sandra
Venue
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2015-03-21
Volume
407
Issue
13
Pages
3751-3761
ISSN
  • 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-2650
OpenAlex
W2060795038
Cited by
46
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, perfluorosulfonic acid, perfluorocarboxylic acids, human serum, automated sample preparation, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFBS, UPLC-MS/MS, biomonitoring
MeSH terms
Alkanes, Blood Chemical Analysis, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Robotics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Reproducibility of Results, Endocrine Disruptors, Automation, Laboratory, Liquid Phase Microextraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review