Cited by 33Action Observation and SynchronizationPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFace Recognition and Perception

Empathy for pain‑related dorsolateral prefrontal activity is modulated by angry face perception

Enzi, Björn, Amirie, Scharbanu, Brüne, Martin·2016·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

Empathy, i.e., the ability to perceive and share another person's affective state, is associated with activity in a complex neural network, including the anterior insula, the anterior and mid-cingulate cortex, and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Here, we were interested in the question how facial emotions influence the activation of the 'pain network'. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the neuronal correlates of empathy for pain and its interaction with emotional face recognition in 20 healthy subjects. We identified various brain regions commonly associated with empathy for pain, including the right mid-cingulate cortex, the left anterior insula (AI), and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), with an increased neuronal response in the left dlPFC after the presentation of angry faces. Furthermore, a negative correlation between psychological measures of alexithymia and empathy for pain-related brain activity was observed in the left AI. The dlPFC is an important brain region involved in cognitive reappraisal or in 'top-down' control of the limbic system. Our findings could therefore reflect a regulatory response associated with distancing from negatively valenced stimuli. Moreover, our results underline the involvement of the AI in empathy for pain responses and their relationship to alexithymia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00221-016-4731-4

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alexithymia is associated with impaired abilities known to rely upon interoception, such as emotion regulation, emotion recognition, empathy, reward processing, and decision-making.

    “alexithymia is associated with impaired abilities known to rely upon interoception, such as emotion regulation (Stasiewicz et al., 2012), emotion recognition (Grynberg et al., 2012), empathy (e.g. Enzi et al., 2016; Gleichgerrcht et al., 2015; Moriguchi et al., 2007a; Silani et al., 2008), reward processing (Bibby and Ferguson, 2011; Goerlich et al., 2016; Morie et al., 2016) and decision-making,”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Enzi et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Enzi, B., Amirie, S., & Brüne, M.
Affiliations
  • LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum (DE)
  • University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Brüne, Martin
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2016-07-22
Volume
234
Issue
11
Pages
3335-3345
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2487581604
Cited by
33
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
empathy for pain, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, midcingulate cortex, facial emotion recognition, alexithymia, pain network, cognitive reappraisal, top-down control
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Emotions, Empathy, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Pain, Photic Stimulation, Statistics as Topic, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review