Cited by 21Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAppendicitis Diagnosis and ManagementIntestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI): absence of renal insufficiency and performance of early bowel resection may indicate improved outcomes

Matthaei, Hanno, Klein, Alina, Branchi, Vittorio, Kalff, Jörg C., Koscielny, Arne·2019·International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Abstract

Purpose Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is still associated with very high morbidity and mortality while the rareness and heterogeneity hamper the establishment of evidence-based guidelines. We sought to help standardize contemporary treatment by a cohort study at our tertiary center in the rising endovascular age.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2005 to 2015. Patients with occlusive (OMI), non-occlusive (NOMI), and venous mesenteric ischemia (VMI) were compared with respect to clinical and treatment parameters as well as outcome.Results The study cohort consisted of 48 patients composed of 27 males and 21 females with an average age of 63 years and an average BMI of 25.1 kg/m 2. In 48% of patients (N=23), an acute arterial OMI had occurred while NOMI was present in 31% (N=15) and VMI in 21% (N=10). Interventional and intraoperative recanalizations were significantly more often required in OMI patients compared with other entities (p=0.003). Patients with venous mesenteric ischemia had a significant better overall survival than patients with OMI or NOMI in the univariate analysis (p=0.027). Patients with renal failure had a 14.7-fold higher relative risk (Cox p=0.013) and patients without bowel resection during primary surgery had a 17.8-fold higher relative risk (Cox p=0.047) to die of AMI in the postoperative course.Conclusions AMI remains a rare but oftentimes fatal disease. Our study provides evidence that outcome may depend on the AMI subtype, presence of renal insufficiency, and early bowel resection. Further research should help individualize treatment for optimized outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00384-019-03388-x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthaei, H., Klein, A., Branchi, V., Kalff, J. C., & Koscielny, A.
Affiliations
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Koscielny, Arne
Venue
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2019-09-11
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1781-1790
ISSN
  • 0179-1958 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1262
OpenAlex
W2972758359
Cited by
21
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Colorectal Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
Keywords
acute mesenteric ischemia, nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, renal failure, recanalization, postoperative mortality, endovascular treatment
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Risk Factors, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Renal Insufficiency, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review