Cited by 124Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Microglial cells are the driving force in fibrillar plaque formation, whereas astrocytes are a leading factor in plaque degradation

Wegiel, J., Wang, K. -C., Tarnawski, M., Lach, B.·2000·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Ultrastructural three-dimensional reconstruction of human classical plaques in different stages of development shows that microglial cells are the major factor driving plaque formation by fibrillar amyloid-beta (Abeta) deposition. The amount of fibrillar Abeta released by microglial cells and the area of direct contact between amyloid and neuron determine the extent of dystrophic changes in neuronal processes and synapses. The volume of hypertrophic astrocytic processes separating fibrillar amyloid from neuron is a measure of the protective activation of astrocytes. On the bases of the volume of amyloid star, microglial cells, dystrophic neurites, and hypertrophic astrocytic processes, and spatial relationships between plaque components, three stages in classical plaque development have been distinguished: early, mature, and late. In early plaque, the leading pathology is fibrillar Abeta deposition by microglial cells with amyloid star formation. The mature plaque is characterized by a balance between amyloid production, neuronal dystrophy, and astrocyte hypertrophy. In late classical plaque, microglial cells retract and expose neuropil on direct contact with amyloid star, enhancing both dystrophic changes in neurons and hypertrophic changes in astrocytes. In late plaques, activation of astrocytes predominates. They degrade amyloid star and peripheral amyloid wisps. The effect of these changes is classical plaque degradation to fibrillar primitive and finally to nonfibrillar,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s004010000199

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wegiel, J., Wang, K. C., Tarnawski, M., & Lach, B.
Affiliations
Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
2000-10-28
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
356-364
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2024304291
Cited by
124
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P0Q-HD3897)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
microglia, astrocytes, amyloid plaques, dystrophic neurites, synaptic loss, astrocyte hypertrophy, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Astrocytes, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurites, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Microglia, Disease Progression, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review