Cited by 909Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Adult mouse astrocytes degrade amyloid-β in vitro and in situ

Wyss-Coray, Tony, Loike, John D., Brionne, Thomas C., Lu, Emily, Anankov, Roman, Yan, Fengrong, Silverstein, Samuel C., Husemann, Jens·2003·Nature Medicine

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by excessive deposition of amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptides in the brain. One of the earliest neuropathological changes in AD is the accumulation of astrocytes at sites of Abeta deposition, but the cause or significance of this cellular response is unclear. Here we show that cultured adult mouse astrocytes migrate in response to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a chemokine present in AD lesions, and cease migration upon interaction with immobilized Abeta(1-42). We also show that astrocytes bind and degrade Abeta(1-42). Astrocytes plated on Abeta-laden brain sections from a mouse model of AD associate with the Abeta deposits and reduce overall Abeta levels in these sections. Our results suggest a novel mechanism for the accumulation of astrocytes around Abeta deposits, indicate a direct role for astrocytes in degradation of Abeta and implicate deficits in astroglial clearance of Abeta in the pathogenesis of AD. Treatments that increase removal of Abeta by astrocytes may therefore be a critical mechanism to reduce the neurodegeneration associated with AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nm838

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyss-Coray, T., Loike, J. D., Brionne, T. C., Lu, E., Anankov, R., Yan, F., Silverstein, S. C., & Husemann, J.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Husemann, Jens
Venue
Nature Medicine
Published
2003-03-03
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
453-457
ISSN
  • 1078-8956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-170X
OpenAlex
W2010476270
Cited by
909
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 53
FWCI
19.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Harvard University
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01ag015871-01a1, 5r01ag019772-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG08702, AG19772, P50AG008702, AG15871)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
amyloid-beta, astrocytes, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid beta degradation, astrocyte migration, MCP-1, amyloid plaques, in situ degradation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Astrocytes, Cell Movement, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Chemokine CCL2, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review