Cited by 58Thermoregulation and physiological responsesSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Nutrient intake and performance during a mountain marathon: an observational study

Kruseman, Maaike, Bucher, Sophie, Bovard, Mélanie, Kayser, Bengt, Bovier, Patrick A.·2005·European Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

In order to study nutrient intake of amateur runners during a mountain marathon, compliance with recommendations, and association with performance, an intake of 42 participants in a Swiss mountain marathon was assessed by direct observation. Data on demographics, dietary preparation and race experience were obtained by questionnaires. Anthropometrical measures were performed before and after the race. Mean hourly intakes (SD) of fluid, carbohydrate, energy and sodium were 545 (158) ml, 31 (14) g, 141 (63) kcal [or 590 (264) kJ], and 150 (203) mg respectively. A third of the runners drank 600 ml h(-1) or more, 52% consumed less than 30 g h(-1 )carbohydrates, 95% consumed less than 500 mg h(-1) sodium. Mean weight loss was 4 (1.5) kg; 30 runners (71%) lost over 3% body mass. Mean running time was 7 h 3 min (1 h 17 min). Most participants failed to meet nutritional recommendations. None were at risk of overhydration. Body composition and race experience were correlated with performance, but not nutrient intake. Because experienced runners are well trained, fitter, and know better their personal needs during such a race, it is difficult to disentangle these associations. As causal relationship cannot be proven with this cross-sectional design, non-compliance with intake recommendations requires additional experimental research on the impact of nutrient intake on field performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00421-004-1234-y

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruseman, M., Bucher, S., Bovard, M., Kayser, B., & Bovier, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Kruseman, Maaike
Venue
European Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2005-02-16
Volume
94
Issue
1-2
Pages
151-157
ISSN
  • 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-6319
  • 1439-6327
OpenAlex
W2147593585
Cited by
58
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
nutrient intake, endurance running, carbohydrate intake, fluid intake, sodium intake, energy intake, dehydration, weight loss, running performance, recreational runners, body composition, fluid overload
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Aged, Aging, Altitude, Body Constitution, Eating, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Physical Endurance, Physical Fitness, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Running, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review