The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early resistance training-induced increases in muscle cross-sectional area are concomitant with edema-induced muscle swelling
Abstract
Purpose It has been proposed that skeletal muscle shows signs of resistance training (RT)-induced muscle hypertrophy much earlier (i.e., ~3-4 weeks of RT) than previously thought. We determined if early increases in whole muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) during a period of RT were concomitant with edematous muscle swelling and thus not completely attributable to hypertrophy. Methods We analyzed vastus lateralis muscle ultrasound CSA images and their respective echo intensities (CSA-USecho) at the beginning (T1), in the 3rd week of RT (T2) and at the end (T3) of a 10-week RT period in ten untrained young men. Functional parameters [training volume (TV = load × reps × sets) and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)] and muscle damage markers (myoglobin and interleukin-6) were also assessed. Result Muscle CSA increased significantly at T2 (~2.7%) and T3 (~10.4%) versus T1. Similarly, CSA-USecho increased at T2 (~17.2%) and T3 (~13.7%). However, when CSA-USecho was normalized to the increase in muscle CSA, only T2 showed a significantly higher USecho versus T1. Additionally, TV increased at T2 and T3 versus T1, but MVC increased only at T3. Myoglobin and Interleukin-6 were elevated at T2 versus T1, and myoglobin was also higher at T2 versus T3. Conclusion We propose that early RT-induced increases in muscle CSA in untrained young individuals are not purely hypertrophy, since there is concomitant edema-induced muscle swelling, probably due to muscle damage, which may account for a large proportion of the increase. Therefore, muscle CSA increases (particularly early in an RT program) should not be labeled as hypertrophy without some concomitant measure of muscle edema/damage.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the hypothesis that widening the translational capacity bottleneck (ribosomal accumulation) is a critical antecedent event strongly associated with structural phenotypic hypertrophy [36,93,94].”
From Ribosome Biogenesis as a Putative Bottleneck to Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy: Mechanisms, Human Evidence, and Practical Modulators (2026) · cites this paper as [93]
Citations
Cites
Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists
Nakagawa, S., & Cuthill, I. C. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00027.x · Cited by 3,835
(1979) · PubMed · Cited by 1,302
Mixed muscle protein synthesis and breakdown after resistance exercise in humans
Phillips, S. M., Tipton, K. D., Aarsland, A., Wolf, S. E., & Wolfe, R. R. (1997) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1997.273.1.e99 · Cited by 1,132
Cermak, N. M., Res, P. T., de Groot, L. C., Saris, W. H., & van Loon, L. J. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.037556 · Cited by 827
Seynnes, O. R., de Boer, M., & Narici, M. V. (2007) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00789.2006 · Cited by 660
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men
Mitchell, C. J., Churchward-Venne, T. A., West, D. W. D., Burd, N. A., Breen, L., Baker, S. K., & Phillips, S. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00307.2012 · Cited by 627
Burd, N. A., West, D. W. D., Staples, A. W., Atherton, P. J., Baker, J. M., Moore, D. R., Holwerda, A. M., Parise, G., Rennie, M. J., Baker, S. K., et al. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012033 · Cited by 531
Wilkinson, S. B., Tarnopolsky, M. A., MacDonald, M. J., MacDonald, J. R., Armstrong, D., & Phillips, S. M. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.4.1031 · Cited by 530
Witard, O. C., Jackman, S. R., Breen, L., Smith, K., Selby, A., & Tipton, K. D. (2014) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.055517 · Cited by 517
Repeated high-force eccentric exercise: effects on muscle pain and damage
Newham, D. J., Jones, D. A., & CLARKSON, P. M. (1987) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1987.63.4.1381 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety
Patterson, S. D., Hughes, L., Warmington, S. A., Burr, J. F., Scott, B. R., Owens, J. G., Abe, T., Nielsen, J. L., Libardi, C. A., Laurentino, G. C., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00533 · Cited by 1,047
Adaptations to Endurance and Strength TrainingPreprint
Hughes, D. C., Ellefsen, S., & Baar, K. (2017) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a029769 · Cited by 661
Damas, F., Phillips, S. M., Libardi, C. A., Vechin, F. C., Lixandrão, M. E., Jannig, P. R., Costa, L. A. R., Bacurau, A. V., Snijders, T., Parise, G., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp272472 · Cited by 353
Self-citationDamas, F., Libardi, C. A., & Ugrinowitsch, C. (2018) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-017-3792-9 · Cited by 254
Self-citationGreater neural adaptations following high- vs. low-load resistance training
Jenkins, N. D. M., Miramonti, A. A., Hill, E. C., Smith, C. M., Cochrane-Snyman, K. C., Housh, T. J., & Cramer, J. T. (2017) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00331 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Damas, F., Phillips, S. M., Lixandrão, M. E., Vechin, F. C., Libardi, C. A., Roschel, H., Tricoli, V., & Ugrinowitsch, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Damas, Felipe
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-56
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-6319
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W1137757416
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 14.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2012/24499-1, 2014/19594-0, 2013/21218-4)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (304205/2011-7, 307023/2014-1)
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, muscle cross-sectional area, muscle edema, muscle swelling, echo intensity, vastus lateralis, muscle damage, myoglobin, interleukin-6, training volume, maximal voluntary contraction, untrained young men
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Edema, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Muscle Contraction, Muscular Diseases, Weight Lifting, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal, Quadriceps Muscle, Resistance Training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review