Cited by 23Muscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and Training

The Addition of Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate and Isomaltulose to Whey Protein Improves Recovery from Highly Demanding Resistance Exercise

Kraemer, William J., Hooper, David R., Szivak, Tunde K., Kupchak, Brian R., Dunn-Lewis, Courtenay, Comstock, Brett A., Flanagan, Shawn D., Looney, David P. +8 more·2015·Journal of the American College of Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated whether a combination of whey protein (WP), calcium beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB), and carbohydrate exert additive effects on recovery from highly demanding resistance exercise. METHODS: Thirteen resistance-trained men (age: 22.6 ± 3.9 years; height: 175.3 ± 12.2 cm; weight: 86.2 ± 9.8 kg) completed a double-blinded, counterbalanced, within-group study. Subjects ingested EAS Recovery Protein (RP; EAS Sports Nutrition/Abbott Laboratories, Columbus, OH) or WP twice daily for 2 weeks prior to, during, and for 2 days following 3 consecutive days of intense resistance exercise. The workout sequence included heavy resistance exercise (day 1) and metabolic resistance exercise (days 2 and 3). The subjects performed no physical activity during day 4 (+24 hours) and day 5 (+48 hours), where recovery testing was performed. Before, during, and following the 3 workouts, treatment outcomes were evaluated using blood-based muscle damage markers and hormones, perceptual measures of muscle soreness, and countermovement jump performance. RESULTS: Creatine kinase was lower for the RP treatment on day 2 (RP: 166.9 ± 56.4 vs WP: 307.1 ± 125.2 IU · L(-1), p ≤ 0.05), day 4 (RP: 232.5 ± 67.4 vs WP: 432.6 ± 223.3 IU · L(-1), p ≤ 0.05), and day 5 (RP: 176.1 ± 38.7 vs 264.5 ± 120.9 IU · L(-1), p ≤ 0.05). Interleukin-6 was lower for the RP treatment on day 4 (RP: 1.2 ± 0.2 vs WP: 1.6 ± 0.6 pg · ml(-1), p ≤ 0.05) and day 5 (RP: 1.1 ± 0.2 vs WP: 1.6 ± 0.4 pg · ml(-1), p ≤ 0.05). Muscle soreness was lower for RP treatment on day 4 (RP: 2.0 ± 0.7 vs WP: 2.8 ± 1.1 cm, p ≤ 0.05). Vertical jump power was higher for the RP treatment on day 4 (RP: 5983.2 ± 624 vs WP 5303.9 ± 641.7 W, p ≤ 0.05) and day 5 (RP: 5792.5 ± 595.4 vs WP: 5200.4 ± 501 W, p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that during times of intense conditioning, the recovery benefits of WP are enhanced with the addition of HMB and a slow-release carbohydrate. We observed reductions in markers of muscle damage and improved athletic performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07315724.2014.938790

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • β-HMB, a leucine metabolite, may attenuate catabolism and exercise-induced muscle damage, favoring growth hormone production, tissue repair, and muscular protein synthesis.

    “β-HMB, a leucine metabolite, may also attenuate catabolism and exercise-induced muscle damage (Arazi et al. 2021;Kim and Kim 2022), favoring growth hormone production, tissue repair (Arazi et al. 2021) and muscular protein synthesis (Kraemer et al. 2015).”
  • During a heavy resistance training program, recovery benefits of whey protein might be enhanced with the addition of HMB and isomaltulose, which has shown significant reductions in markers of muscle damage while improving athletic performance.

    “Interestingly, during a heavy resistance training program, the recovery benefits of whey protein might be enhanced with the addition of β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) and isomaltulose, which has shown to have significant reductions in markers of muscle damage while improving athletic performance [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kraemer, W. J., Hooper, D. R., Szivak, T. K., Kupchak, B. R., Dunn-Lewis, C., Comstock, B. A., Flanagan, S. D., Looney, D. P., Sterczala, A. J., DuPont, W. H., Pryor, J. L., Luk, H.-Y., Maladoungdock, J., McDermott, D., Volek, J. S., & Maresh, C. M.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Kraemer, William J.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Nutrition
Published
2015-03-04
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
91-99
ISSN
  • 0731-5724 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-1087
OpenAlex
W2013715814
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, isomaltulose, whey protein, resistance training, exercise-induced muscle damage, creatine kinase, interleukin-6, muscle soreness, countermovement jump, carbohydrate supplementation, protein supplementation, post-exercise recovery, muscle damage markers, resistance-trained men
MeSH terms
Whey Proteins, Adult, Creatine Kinase, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Isomaltose, Male, Movement, Time Factors, Valerates, Interleukin-6, Muscle, Skeletal, Recovery of Function, Athletic Performance, Resistance Training, Young Adult, Pain Perception, Myalgia, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review