A kinetic mechanism for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors based on multiple allosteric transitions.
Open accessAbstract
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are transmembrane oligomeric proteins that mediate interconversions between open and closed channel states under the control of neurotransmitters. Fast in vitro chemical kinetics and in vivo electrophysiological recordings are consistent with the following multi-step scheme. Upon binding of agonists, receptor molecules in the closed but activatable resting state (the Basal state, B) undergo rapid transitions to states of higher affinities with either open channels (the Active state, A) or closed channels (the initial Inactivatable and fully Desensitized states, I and D). In order to represent the functional properties of such receptors, we have developed a kinetic model that links conformational interconversion rates to agonist binding and extends the general principles of the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model of allosteric transitions. The crucial assumption is that the linkage is controlled by the position of the interconversion transition states on a hypothetical linear reaction coordinate. Application of the model to the peripheral nicotine acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) accounts for the main properties of ligand-gating, including single-channel events, and several new relationships are predicted. Kinetic simulations reveal errors inherent in using the dose-response analysis, but justify its application under defined conditions. The model predicts that (in order to overcome the intrinsic stability of the B state and to produce the appropriate cooperativity) channel activation is driven by an A state with a Kd in the 50 nM range, hence some 140-fold stronger than the apparent affinity of the open state deduced previously. According to the model, recovery from the desensitized states may occur via rapid transit through the A state with minimal channel opening, thus without necessarily undergoing a distinct recovery pathway, as assumed in the standard 'cycle' model. Transitions to the desensitized states by low concentration 'pre-pulses' are predicted to occur without significant channel opening, but equilibrium values of IC50 can be obtained only with long pre-pulse times. Predictions are also made concerning allosteric effectors and their possible role in coincidence detection. In terms of future developments, the analysis presented here provides a physical basis for constructing more biologically realistic models of synaptic modulation that may be applied to artificial neural networks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
By examining 17 models from the systems biology literature, the paper showed that their parameter sensitivities all share striking common features deemed "sloppiness".
“By examining 17 models from the systems biology literature [2,21,25,28–41], we showed that their parameter sensitivities all share striking common features deemed “sloppiness””
From Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models (2007) · cites this paper as [32]
Cites
Bienenstock, E., Cooper, L., & Munro, P. (1982) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.02-01-00032.1982 · Cited by 2,896 · see citing works
Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1992) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2010.001.0001 · Cited by 1,757 · see citing works
Eaton, W. A., Henry, E. R., & Hofrichter, J. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.10.4472 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Universally Sloppy Parameter Sensitivities in Systems Biology Models
Gutenkunst, R. N., Waterfall, J. J., Casey, F. P., Brown, K. S., Myers, C. R., & Sethna, J. P. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030189 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
“The models are ordered by increasing number of free parameters and are: (a) eukaryotic cell cycle [28], (b) Xenopus egg cell cycle [29], (c) eukaryotic mitosis [30], (d) generic circadian rhythm [31], (e) nicotinic acetylcholine intra-receptor dynamics [32], (f) generic kinase cascade [33], (g) Xenopus Wnt signaling […”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrain nicotinic receptors: structure and regulation, role in learning and reinforcement
Changeux, J.-P., Bertrand, D., Corringer, P.-J., Dehaene, S., Edelstein, S., Léna, C., Le Novère, N., Marubio, L., Picciotto, M., & Zoli, M. (1998) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0165-0173(97)00040-4 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom the stochasticity of molecular processes to the variability of synaptic transmission
Ribrault, C., Sekimoto, K., & Triller, A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3025 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
A gating mechanism of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels
Calimet, N., Simoes, M., Changeux, J.-P., Karplus, M., Taly, A., & Cecchini, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1313785110 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citationNicotine and cannabinoids: parallels, contrasts and interactions
VIVEROS, M., MARCO, E., & FILE, S. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.08.002 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Anesthetics target interfacial transmembrane sites in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
Forman, S. A., Chiara, D. C., & Miller, K. W. (2015) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2014.10.002 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Edelstein, S. J., Schaad, O., Henry, E., Bertrand, D., & Changeux, J.-P.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Institut Pasteur (FR)
- Venue
- Biological Cybernetics
- Published
- 1996-12-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 361-379
- ISSN
- 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0770
- OpenAlex
- W2005749181
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Biological Cybernetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, allosteric transition, Monod-Wyman-Changeux model, desensitization, channel open and closed states, kinetic model, dose-response analysis, prepulse, allosteric effectors, coincidence detection, synaptic modulation
- MeSH terms
- Allosteric Site, Computer Simulation, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Kinetics, Ligands, Membrane Potentials, Models, Biological, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Nicotinic, Sensitivity and Specificity, Synapses, Ion Channel Gating, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review