Cited by 257Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesMedical and Biological Sciences

Subcomponents and connectivity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus in the human brain

Wang, Xuhui, Pathak, Sudhir, Stefaneanu, Lucia, Yeh, Fang-Cheng, Li, Shiting, Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.·2016·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

The subcomponents of the human superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) are disputed. The objective of this study was to investigate the segments, connectivity and asymmetry of the SLF. We performed high angular diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) analysis on ten healthy adults. We also conducted fiber tracking on a 30-subject DSI template (CMU-30) and 488-subject template from the Human Connectome Project (HCP-488). In addition, five normal brains obtained at autopsy were microdissected. Based on tractography and microdissection results, we show that the human SLF differs significantly from that of monkey. The fibers corresponding to SLF-I found in 6 out of 20 hemispheres proved to be part of the cingulum fiber system in all cases and confirmed on both DSI and HCP-488 template. The most common patterns of connectivity bilaterally were as follows: from angular gyrus to caudal middle frontal gyrus and dorsal precentral gyrus representing SLF-II (or dorsal SLF), and from supramarginal gyrus to ventral precentral gyrus and pars opercularis to form SLF-III (or ventral SLF). Some connectivity features were, however, clearly asymmetric. Thus, we identified a strong asymmetry of the dorsal SLF (SLF-II), where the connectivity between the supramarginal gyrus with the dorsal precentral gyrus and the caudal middle frontal gyrus was only present in the left hemisphere. Contrarily, the ventral SLF (SLF-III) showed fairly constant connectivity with pars triangularis only in the right hemisphere. The results provide a novel neuroanatomy of the SLF that may help to better understand its functional role in the human brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-015-1028-5

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, X., Pathak, S., Stefaneanu, L., Yeh, F.-C., Li, S., & Fernandez-Miranda, J. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Fernandez-Miranda, Juan C.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2015-03-18
Volume
221
Issue
4
Pages
2075-2092
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2049658101
Cited by
257
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5
FWCI
13.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, cingulum, hemispheric lateralization, white matter connectivity, angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, pars opercularis, pars triangularis, diffusion spectrum imaging, tractography
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Neural Pathways, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Young Adult, Connectome, White Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review