Cited by 11Asthma and respiratory diseasesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Long-term predictors of anxiety and depression in adult patients with asthma

Labor, Marina, Labor, Slavica, Jurić, Iva, Fijačko, Vladimir, Popović Grle, Sanja, Plavec, Davor·2017·Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

Abstract

Background It is well established that anxiety and depression are associated with asthma, but there is limited evidence about the persistence of anxiety/depression in asthma. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term predictors of anxiety and depression in adult asthmatic patients.Methods A total of 90 adult asthma patients (63 women, age 18-50 years) with different levels of disease control (28 uncontrolled and 34 partially controlled) were assessed at baseline and at follow-up after 7 years for anxiety, depression and asthma control. The same work-up on both occasions included: demographics, living conditions, medical history (e.g. comorbidities, adherence and exacerbations), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), disease control and lung function. Persistence was defined as the HADS scores for anxiety and depression present at baseline and follow-up.Results The HADS results at follow-up visit showed 36 (40%) asthma patients with anxiety and 13 (14%) with depression, with the persistence of anxiety in 17 (19%) and of depression in 7 (8%) patients. Significant predictors of anxiety at follow-up were HADS and AQLQ results at baseline and several parameters of asthma control at follow-up (area under the curve AUC 0.917, 95% confidence interval CI 0.829-0.969, p < 0.001) and for depression AQLQ mood disorder domain, asthma control and lung function (AUC 0.947, 95% CI 0.870-0.986, p < 0.001).Conclusion Anxiety and depression persist over years in some patients with asthma. The association between mood disorders and asthma suggests potential mutual treatability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00508-017-1203-1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Labor, M., Labor, S., Jurić, I., Fijačko, V., Popović Grle, S., & Plavec, D.
Affiliations
  • Klinički bolnički centar Osijek (HR)
  • Children's Hospital Srebrnjak (HR)
Corresponding author
Plavec, Davor
Venue
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Published
2017-04-18
Volume
129
Issue
19-20
Pages
665-673
ISSN
  • 0043-5325 (ISSN-L)
  • 1613-7671
OpenAlex
W2606307546
Cited by
11
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiener klinische Wochenschrift (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
asthma, anxiety, depression, mood disorders, asthma control, asthma quality of life, lung function, disease control, long-term predictors, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Asthma, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review