Cited by 54Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Integrating mindfulness in supportive cancer care: a cohort study on a mindfulness-based day care clinic for cancer survivors

Dobos, Gustav, Overhamm, Tatiana, Büssing, Arndt, Ostermann, Thomas, Langhorst, Jost, Kümmel, Sherko, Paul, Anna, Cramer, Holger·2015·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a mindfulness-based day care clinic group program for cancer survivors on health-related quality of life and mental health; and to investigate which psychological variables are associated with changes in health variables. Methods One hundred seventeen cancer survivors (91.0 % female; mean age 53.9 ± 10.7 years; 65.0 % breast cancer; mean time since diagnosis 27.2 ± 46.5 months) participated in an 11-week mindfulness-based day care clinic group program, 6 h per week. The intervention incorporated mindfulness-based meditation, yoga, cognitive-behavioral techniques, and lifestyle modification. Outcome measures including health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), depression and anxiety (HADS); and psychological variables including life satisfaction (BMLSS), mindfulness (FMI), adaptive coping styles (AKU), spiritual/religious attitudes in dealing with illness (SpREUK), and interpretation of illness (IIQ) were assessed before, after, and 3 months after the intervention. Results Using mixed linear models, significant improvements in global health status, physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning were found. Cancer-related symptoms, including fatigue, pain, insomnia, constipation, anxiety, and depression, also improved significantly. Mindfulness, life satisfaction, health satisfaction, all coping styles, all spiritual/religious attitudes, and interpr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-015-2660-6

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobos, G., Overhamm, T., Büssing, A., Ostermann, T., Langhorst, J., Kümmel, S., Paul, A., & Cramer, H.
Affiliations
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Corresponding author
Cramer, Holger
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2015-02-26
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
2945-2955
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2041770920
Cited by
54
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, cancer survivors, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, life satisfaction, coping styles, breast cancer, yoga, cognitive-behavioral techniques, lifestyle modification, fatigue
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Day Care, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Cohort Studies, Survivors, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review