Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Towards a consensus on diagnostic criteria, measurement and trial design of the premenstrual disorders: the ISPMD Montreal consensus

Open access
O’Brien, Patrick Michael Shaughn, Bäckström, Torbjorn, Brown, Candace, Dennerstein, Lorraine, Endicott, Jean, Epperson, C. Neill, Eriksson, Elias, Freeman, Ellen, Halbreich, Uriel, Ismail, Khaled M. K., Panay, Nicholas, Pearlstein, Teri, Rapkin, Andrea, Reid, Robert, Schmidt, Peter, Steiner, Meir, Studd, John, Yonkers, Kimberley·2011·Archives of Women's Mental Health
DOI 10.1007/s00737-010-0201-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Premenstrual disorders (PMD) are characterised by a cluster of somatic and psychological symptoms of varying severity that occur during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and resolve during menses (Freeman and Sondheimer, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 5:30–39, 2003; Halbreich, Gynecol Endocrinol 19:320–334, 2004). Although PMD have been widely recognised for many decades, their precise cause is still unknown and there are no definitive, universally accepted diagnostic criteria. To consider this issue, an international multidisciplinary group of experts met at a face-to-face consensus meeting to review current definitions and diagnostic criteria for PMD. This was followed by extensive correspondence. The consensus group formally became established as the International Society for Premenstrual Disorders (ISPMD). The inaugural meeting of the ISPMD was held in Montreal in September 2008. The primary aim was to provide a unified approach for the diagnostic criteria of PMD, their quantification and guidelines on clinical trial design. This report summarises their recommendations. It is hoped that the criteria proposed here will inform discussions of the next edition of the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), and the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-V) criteria that are currently under consideration. It is also hoped that the proposed definitions and guidelines could be used by all clinicians and investigators to provide a consistent approach to the diagnosis and treatment of PMD and to aid scientific and clinical research in this field.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-010-0201-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
O’Brien, P. M. S., Bäckström, T., Brown, C., Dennerstein, L., Endicott, J., Epperson, C. N., Eriksson, E., Freeman, E., Halbreich, U., Ismail, K. M. K., Panay, N., Pearlstein, T., Rapkin, A., Reid, R., Schmidt, P., Steiner, M., Studd, J., & Yonkers, K.
Venue
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-01-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
13-21
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
DOI
10.1007/s00737-010-0201-3
OpenAlex
W2076714793
Cited by
295
References
25
FWCI
18.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a consensus on diagnostic criteria, measurement and trial design of the premenstrual disorders: the ISPMD Montreal consensus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00737-010-0201-3
The paper
O’Brien, P. M. S., Bäckström, T., Brown, C., Dennerstein, L., Endicott, J., Epperson, C. N., Eriksson, E., Freeman, E., Halbreich, U., Ismail, K. M. K., Panay, N., Pearlstein, T., Rapkin, A., Reid, R., Schmidt, P., Steiner, M., Studd, J., & Yonkers, K. (2011). Towards a consensus on diagnostic criteria, measurement and trial design of the premenstrual disorders: the ISPMD Montreal consensus. Archives of Women's Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-010-0201-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.