Cited by 14Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Health and DevelopmentMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Symptoms of depression during pregnancy are associated with increased systolic blood pressure responses towards infant distress

Pearson, R. M., Lightman, S. L., Evans, J.·2012·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

A mother's response towards her infant's distress is important for the mother-infant relationship and infant development. There is evidence that maternal responses are impaired in depressed mothers. Further understanding of how depression disrupts maternal responses is important to direct treatment strategies. There is evidence that maternal responses develop during pregnancy. Further understanding of the relationship between depression and maternal responses during pregnancy is therefore important. We have previously found that depression during pregnancy is associated with reduced attentional engagement with infant distress but is unclear whether this is an insensitive or avoidance response. In the current study, we investigated the impact of anhedonic symptoms of depression on pregnant women's autonomic response towards infant distress. We found that women experiencing anhedonic depressive symptoms during pregnancy had significantly larger systolic blood pressure responses towards infant distress (β, 1.6 mmHg, 95 % CI 0.5 to 2.6, p = 0.004) than non-depressed pregnant women. These results suggest that anhedonic symptoms during pregnancy may be associated with increased sympathetic sensitivity. This suggests that depression is not, at a sympathetic level at least, associated with insensitivity to infant distress and rather depression may be associated with an abnormally sensitive response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-012-0269-z

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, R. M., Lightman, S. L., & Evans, J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, R. M.
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
95-105
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2091987865
Cited by
14
References
59
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Academy
  • University of Bristol
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
maternal depression, pregnancy, anhedonia, infant distress, maternal responsiveness, autonomic nervous system, systolic blood pressure, mother-infant relationship, attentional engagement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Blood Pressure, Depression, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Anhedonia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review