Cited by 88Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcarePregnancy-related medical research

The prevalence and incidence of perinatal anxiety disorders among women experiencing a medically complicated pregnancy

Fairbrother, Nichole, Young, Allan H., Zhang, Areiyu, Janssen, Patricia, Antony, Martin M.·2017·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

Over 20% of pregnancies involve medical difficulties that pose some threat to the health and well-being of the mother, her developing infant, or both. We report on the first comparison of the prevalence and incidence of maternal anxiety disorders (AD) in pregnancy and the postpartum, across levels of medical risk in pregnancy. Pregnant women (N = 310) completed postnatal screening measures for anxiety. Women who scored at or above cutoff on one or more of the screening measures were administered a diagnostic interview (n = 115) for AD. Pregnancies were classified into low, moderate, or high risk based on self-report and contact with high-risk maternity clinics. The incidence of AD in pregnancy was higher among women classified as experiencing a medically moderate or high-risk pregnancy, compared with women classified as experiencing a medically low-risk pregnancy. Across risk groups, there were no differences in AD prevalence or in the incidence of AD in the postpartum. Demographic characteristics and parity did not contribute meaningfully to outcomes. Pregnancies characterized by medical risks are associated with an increased likelihood of new onset AD. Women experiencing medically complex pregnancies should be screened for anxiety and offered appropriate treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-016-0704-7

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fairbrother, N., Young, A. H., Zhang, A., Janssen, P., & Antony, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Corresponding author
Fairbrother, Nichole
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2016-12-28
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
311-319
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W2564541831
Cited by
88
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
maternal anxiety, complicated pregnancy, high-risk pregnancy, postpartum anxiety, prevalence, incidence, anxiety screening, parity, pregnancy risk classification
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Mothers, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Care, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence, Pregnancy, High-Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review