Cited by 32Reproductive Health and TechnologiesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Psychological coping strategies associated with improved mental health in the context of infertility

Chernoff, Andie, Balsom, Ashley A., Gordon, Jennifer L.·2021·Archives of Women s Mental Health

Abstract

To examine the use of psychological coping strategies across the menstrual cycle in relation to within-person changes in depressed mood, anxious mood, and infertility-related distress, in a sample of women struggling to conceive. Sixty-five women from Canada and the USA (aged 19-43 years) trying to conceive naturally for ≥ 12 months were recruited via social media. On the first day of each participant's menstrual period, and every 3 days until the end of their cycle, participants completed questionnaires assessing depressed and anxious mood, and infertility-related distress. In addition, participants completed a 13-item coping questionnaire assessing four general coping strategies: emotional suppression, active coping, engagement in activities unrelated to trying to conceive, and downplaying the importance of biological children. The within-person effect of daily coping strategies on person-centred mood and infertility-related distress was examined. Day-to-day use of behavioural engagement was associated with lower person-centred depression scores, β(SEM) = - 3.25(.51), p < .0001, anxiety scores, β(SEM) = - 2.07(.36), p < .0001, and infertility-related daily distress, β(SEM) = - .64(.22), p = .005. Downplaying the importance of biological children was also associated with person-centred depression scores, β(SEM) = 1.14(.47), p = .016. Neither active coping nor emotional suppression was related to depression, anxiety, or distress (ps > .0125). These findings point to promising targets of future intervention studies, including promoting increased engagement in behaviours unrelated to conceiving and promoting acceptance, rather than denial and resistance, of feelings throughout the infertility journey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00737-020-01029-9

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chernoff, A., Balsom, A. A., & Gordon, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Regina (CA)
Corresponding author
Gordon, Jennifer L.
Venue
Archives of Women s Mental Health
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
73-83
ISSN
  • 1434-1816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-1102
OpenAlex
W3018301621
Cited by
32
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Women s Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation (4577)
  • Canada Research Chairs (NA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
infertility, coping strategies, depressive mood, anxious mood, menstrual cycle, within-person change, emotional suppression, active coping, behavioral engagement, women's mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Canada, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Infertility, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review