Cited by 17Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Long-term outcomes of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric anxiety disorders: towards a stepped care model of health care delivery

Open access
Jolstedt, Maral, Vigerland, Sarah, Mataix-Cols, David, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Wahlund, Tove, Nord, Martina, Högström, Jens, Öst, Lars-Göran +1 more·2021·European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) is emerging as a powerful tool to fill the gap between demand and availability of evidence-based treatment for paediatric anxiety disorders. However, it is still unclear how to best implement it in routine clinical care. 123 children (8–12 years) with anxiety disorders underwent a 12-week ICBT programme with limited therapist support. Participants were assessed 3- and 12-month post-ICBT (3MFU and 12MFU, respectively). Non-remitters who still fulfilled diagnostic criteria for their principal anxiety disorder at 3MFU were offered additional manualised “face-to-face” (F2F) CBT. The aim of the study was to emulate a stepped-care model of health care delivery, where the long-term treatment gains of ICBT as well as the potential benefit of proving addition treatment to non-remitters of ICBT were evaluated. Remitters of ICBT ( n = 73) continued to improve throughout the study period (pre-ICBT to 12MFU; Cohen’s d = 2.42). At 12MFU, 89% ( n = 65) were free from their principal anxiety disorder. Of all the participants classed as non-remitters at 3MFU ( n = 37), 48.6% ( n = 18) accepted the offer to receive additional F2F CBT. These participants also improved with a large effect from pre-ICBT to 12MFU (Cohen’s d = 2.27), with the largest effect occurring during F2F CBT. At 12MFU, 83% ( n = 15) were free from their principal anxiety disorders. The majority of non-remitters declining additional F2F CBT (63.2%; n = 12) did so due to already receiving treatment at their local CAMHS, prior to 3MFU. The effects of ICBT for anxiety disorders are durable at least up to 1 year after the end of treatment. Patients who fail to fully benefit from ICBT improved further with additional F2F sessions at our clinic, suggesting that it may be feasible to implement ICBT within a stepped-care model of health care delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00787-020-01645-x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This study presents the first stepped-care CBT protocol for childhood anxiety developed for use in a primary care setting.

    “However, to our knowledge, this study presents the first stepped-care CBT protocol for childhood anxiety developed for use in a primary care setting.”

    From Developing a primary care-based cognitive behavioral intervention for anxiety in children through a participatory approach: a qualitative study. (2026) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion says this was the first study to adopt a stepped-care approach in a clinical setting for paediatric anxiety, using internet-delivered CBT followed by face-to-face CBT for non-remitters. It does not say the protocol was developed for primary care: the Methodology > Interventions section places the face-to-face treatment at a specialised child and adolescent psychiatry research centre. Primary care centres are mentioned in Methodology > Participants as a source of referrals. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jolstedt, M., Vigerland, S., Mataix-Cols, D., Ljótsson, B., Wahlund, T., Nord, M., Högström, J., Öst, L.-G., & Serlachius, E.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Jolstedt, Maral
Venue
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1723-1732
ISSN
  • 1018-8827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-165X
OpenAlex
W3088420987
Cited by
17
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Forte 2014-4052)
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting (HNSV 14099)
  • Karolinska Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, stepped care, long-term treatment outcomes, remission, children and adolescents, child and adolescent mental health services
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review