Cited by 76Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of therapist-guided internet cognitive behavioural therapy for paediatric anxiety disorders: a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Open access
Jolstedt, Maral, Wahlund, Tove, Lenhard, Fabian, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Mataix-Cols, David, Nord, Martina, Öst, Lars-Göran, Högström, Jens +2 more·2018·The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health

Abstract

Background Paediatric anxiety disorders are associated with substantial disability and long-term adverse consequences, but only a small proportion of affected children have access to evidence-based treatment. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) could help increase accessibility but needs further rigorous assessment. We aimed to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ICBT in the treatment of paediatric anxiety disorders.Methods We did a single-blind randomised controlled trial in a clinical research unit within the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in Stockholm (Sweden). Eligible participants were children aged 8-12 years with a diagnosis of a principal anxiety disorder (seperation anxiety disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, or panic disorder) of at least moderate severity. We randomly allocated participants (1:1) to ICBT or internet-delivered child-directed play, an active comparator aimed to improve parent-child relationships and increase a child's self-esteem without directly targeting anxiety. Block sizes for the randomisation varied between four and six and were generated using a computer random-number generator, and the allocation was concealed from the researchers by opaque sealed envelopes. Both treatment programmes comprised 12 modules presented over 12 weeks with weekly asynchronous online therapist support, and consisted of texts, films, illustrations, and exercises. The primary outcome was severity rating of the principal anxiety disorder 12-weeks post-treatment, via the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (a rating of at least 4 corresponds to meeting the criteria for the principal diagnosis), assessed by clinicians masked to treatment allocation. All participants were included in the primary analysis (intention-to-treat). This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02350257.Findings Between March 11, 2015, and Oct 21, 2016, 131 participants were recruited and allocated to either ICBT (n=66) or internet-delivered child-directed play (n=65). The clinician-assessed severity rating of the principal anxiety disorder improved significantly after the 12-weeks treatment period for participants in both ICBT (within-group effect size 1·22, 95% CI 0·78-1·65) and the active control (0·72, 0·44-1·00) groups. However, greater improvement was seen with ICBT than with the active control (estimated mean difference 0·79, 95% CI 0·42-1·16, p=0·002; between-group effect size 0·77, 95% CI 0·40-1·15). 29 (48%) participants in the ICBT group no longer had their principal diagnosis, compared to nine (15%) in the active control group (odds ratio 5·41, 95% CI 2·26 to 12·90, p<0·0001); the number needed to treat for ICBT to gain one additional participant in remission was three (95% CI 2·85 to 3·15). ICBT resulted in an average societal-cost saving of €493·05 (95% CI 477·17 to 508·92) per participant. No severe adverse events were reported.Interpretation ICBT is an efficacious and cost-effective treatment for paediatric anxiety disorders that should be considered for implementation in routine clinical care.Funding The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, and Stockholm County Council.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30275-x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jolstedt, M., Wahlund, T., Lenhard, F., Ljótsson, B., Mataix-Cols, D., Nord, M., Öst, L.-G., Högström, J., Serlachius, E., & Vigerland, S.
Affiliations
  • Region Stockholm (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Jolstedt, Maral
Venue
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
2
Issue
11
Pages
792-801
ISSN
2352-4642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892024261
Cited by
76
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Archive (Karolinska Institutet) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, child-directed play, cost-effectiveness, treatment efficacy, separation anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, specific phobia, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, child and adolescent mental health services, parent-child relationship, self-esteem, child and adolescent mental health
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Self Concept, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review